Cited by

7 Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , ; Knappen v. Freeman, 47 Minn. 491 , ; Roseberry v. Hart-Parr Co. 145 Minn. 142 , ; Atherton v. Barber, 112 Minn. 523 , ; Luebke v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. 178 Minn. 40 , .

Co. 40 Minn. 476 , ; Knappen v. Freeman, 47 Minn. 491 , ; Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , ; Roseberry v. Hart-Parr Co. 145 Minn. 142 , ; Pioneer Elec.

(2 ed.) § 3841; Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , .

See Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , ; Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , , Ann. Cas.

485; Knappen v. Freeman, 47 Minn. 491 , ; Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , ; Bunkers v. Peters, 122 Minn. 130 , ; Schlecter v. Felton, 134 Minn. 143 , , L.R.A.

485; Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , ; Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 129 Minn. 145 , .

Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283, 286 , .

873; Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , .

Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , .

truth of statements made is not a defense, when it said: “Whether the representations were made innocently or knowingly they would equally operate as a fraud upon the plaintiff, provided they were made unqualifiedly, or as of defendant’s own knowledge.” If there can be any doubt as to the meaning of that language, there can be none as to the language of the court in Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283, 286 , , when it was said of the statements of defendant’s representative Lee “that Lee

Plaintiff insists that O’Dean was Wagner’s agent, therefore the latter is bound by O’Dean’s misrepresentations; or else that the two were partners and in the partnership business the misrepresentations of one partner makes the individual partners liable, and cites King v. Remington, 36 Minn. 15 , , and Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , .

“Where one investigates fully for himself, he cannot claim reliance on the representation of another; but partial investigation and reliance in part will not bar an action for deceit.” Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , syllabus, .

Nelson v. Carlson, supra; Erickson v. Fisher, 51 Minn. 300 , ; Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , ; Baker v. Mathew, 137 Iowa, 410 , .

a; Fixen v. Blake, 47 Minn. 540 , ; Wallace v. Hallowell, 56 Minn. 501 , ; Mountain v. Day, 91 Minn. 249 , ; Ritko v. Grove, 102 Minn. 312 , ; Hanson v. Hellie, 107 Minn. 375 , ; Knight v. Leighton, 110 Minn. 254 , ; Selover, Bates & Co. v. Freeman, 111 Minn. 318 , ; and Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , .