Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co., 136 N.W. 271.

26 citing documents.

Vista Fund v. Garis 277 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1979
Vista Fund v. Garis 277 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1979
818, 821 (1913); Venner v. Great Northern Ry., 117 Minn. 447, 456 , 136 N.W.
Holtman v. Crookston Milling Co. 14 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 1944
Holtman v. Crookston Milling Co. 14 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 1944
Co. 117 Minn. 447 , , there was but one cause of action, namely, the recovery of the property of the railway, whether in the unauthorized hands of trustees or the holding company.
Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co. 285 N.W. 809 Minn. 1939
Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co. 285 N.W. 809 Minn. 1939
Co. 117 Minn. 447 , 453 , 136 N.W.
Kaiser v. Butchart 274 N.W. 680 Minn. 1937
Kaiser v. Butchart 274 N.W. 680 Minn. 1937
In Re Estate of Kennedy 242 N.W. 697 Minn. 1932
In Re Estate of Kennedy 242 N.W. 697 Minn. 1932
Co. 117 Minn. 447 , , and State v. G. N. Ry.
Schmid v. Ballard 220 N.W. 423 Minn. 1928
Schmid v. Ballard 220 N.W. 423 Minn. 1928
Co. 117 Minn. 447 , ; Miner v. Belle Isle Ice Co. 93 Mich.
Brown County Bank v. Freie Presse Printing Co. 218 N.W. 557 Minn. 1928
Brown County Bank v. Freie Presse Printing Co. 218 N.W. 557 Minn. 1928
Co. 117 Minn. 447 , ; Morrill v. Little Falls Mfg.
Bacich v. Northland Transportation Co. 217 N.W. 930 Minn. 1928
Bacich v. Northland Transportation Co. 217 N.W. 930 Minn. 1928
Co. 117 Minn. 447, 453 , .
State v. Great Northern Railway Co. 200 N.W. 834 Minn. 1924
State v. Great Northern Railway Co. 200 N.W. 834 Minn. 1924
Co. 117 Minn. 447 , , and in In re Thorne, 145 Minn. 412 , .
Seitz v. Michel 181 N.W. 102 Minn. 1921
Seitz v. Michel 181 N.W. 102 Minn. 1921
Co. 117 Minn. 447 , ; Tasler v. Peerless Tire Co. 144 Minn. 150 , .
Thorne v. State 177 N.W. 638 Minn. 1920
Thorne v. State 177 N.W. 638 Minn. 1920
Seitz v. Michel 170 N.W. 197 Minn. 1918
Seitz v. Michel 170 N.W. 197 Minn. 1918
Co. 117 Minn. 447 , , and cases cited therein, where one general transaction was involved and one general right was demanded, and where all the defendants were concerned with the main purpose o'f the litigation though affected in different measures.
Price v. Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railway Co. 153 N.W. 532 Minn. 1915
Price v. Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railway Co. 153 N.W. 532 Minn. 1915
Co. 117 Minn. 447 , : “One general right is demanded and it is not fatal that defendants are in a measure separately or independently involved.” In Pleins v. Wachenheimer, 108 Minn. 342 , , 133 Am.