Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Burmeister v. Gust, 135 N.W. 980.

32 citing documents.

In Re Estate of Schroeder 441 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re Estate of Schroeder 441 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , 135 N.W.
Boese v. Langley 7 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1942
In Re Estate of Boese 7 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1942
Boese v. Langley 7 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1942
Geraghty v. Kilroy, 103 Minn. 286 , ; Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , ; Lord v. Miller, 277 Mass. 276 , 178 N. E. 649 ; Wyman v. Symmes, 92 Mass. (10 Allen) 153 ; Jones v. Larrabee, 47 Me. 474 ; In re Ferguson’s Estate, 295 Mich.
In Re Estate of Boese 7 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1942
838 ; Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , 135 N.W.
Salscheider v. Holmes 286 N.W. 347 Minn. 1939
Salscheider v. Holmes 286 N.W. 347 Minn. 1939
That seéins to be-the purport of our decisions in Bowers v. Schuler, 54 Minn. 99 , ; Geraghty v. Kilroy, 103 Minn. 286 , ; Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , ; Dale v. First Nat.
Exsted v. Exsted 279 N.W. 554 Minn. 1938
Exsted v. Exsted 279 N.W. 554 Minn. 1938
Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , .
In Re Estate of Nelson 260 N.W. 205 Minn. 1935
Iverson v. Johnson 260 N.W. 205 Minn. 1935
Iverson v. Johnson 260 N.W. 205 Minn. 1935
The appellant contends that although this precise question has never been determined in this state the right of an administrator to appeal in a case of this kind necessarily follows from the reasoning employed in Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , , and in In re Estate of Leonard, 191 Minn. 388 , , where it was held that executors had a right of appeal.
In Re Estate of Nelson 260 N.W. 205 Minn. 1935
The appellant contends that although this precise question has never been determined in this state the right of an administrator to appeal in a case of this kind necessarily follows from the reasoning employed in Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , 135 N.W.
In Re Estate of Leonard 254 N.W. 594 Minn. 1934
In Re Estate of Leonard 254 N.W. 594 Minn. 1934
In reversing the decision of the district court this court stated [ 106 Minn. 457 ]: “The executor may be a mere stakeholder, or he may become the 'sole champion of the ivill.’ ” In Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , , it was claimed that an executor could not take an appeal from an order of the probate court disallowing probate of a will.
In Re Estate of Jefferson 209 N.W. 267 Minn. 1926
In Re Estate of Jefferson 209 N.W. 267 Minn. 1926
368 ; In re Brown, 32 Minn. 443 , ; Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , ; Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , .
Burns v. Carlaw 189 N.W. 413 Minn. 1922
Burns v. Carlaw 189 N.W. 413 Minn. 1922
Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , ; Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , .
Bowler v. Fahey 162 N.W. 515 Minn. 1917
Bowler v. Fahey 162 N.W. 515 Minn. 1917
Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , .
Kelly v. Kennedy 158 N.W. 395 Minn. 1916
Kelly v. Kennedy 158 N.W. 395 Minn. 1916
There is nothing opposed to this conclusion in Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , , where it is held that a notice of appeal from the probate court may be served on the executor, or in Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn, 247, , holding that an executor presenting a will for probate may appeal from an order denying it.
State ex rel. Benz v. Probate Court 155 N.W. 906 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Benz v. Probate Court 155 N.W. 906 Minn. 1916
The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied on the authority of Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , ; Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , , and the authorities referred to in the opinions in those cases.
Thill v. Freiermuth 156 N.W. 260 Minn. 1916
Thill v. Freiermuth 156 N.W. 260 Minn. 1916
See Woodville v. Morrill, 130 Minn. 92 , ; Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , ; In re Hess’ Will, 48 Minn. 504 , 51 N W. 614, 31 Am.
Buck v. Buck 142 N.W. 729 Minn. 1913
Buck v. Buck 142 N.W. 729 Minn. 1913
665; Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , ; Tyner v. Varien, 97 Minn. 181, 183 , ; Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , .
Empenger v. Fairley 137 N.W. 1110 Minn. 1912
Empenger v. Fairley 137 N.W. 1110 Minn. 1912
We hold against this contention, following and applying Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , .