Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hubachek v. Maxbass Security Bank, 134 N.W. 640.

25 citing documents.

Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLP 824 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLP 824 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
Bank, 117 Minn. 163, 169 , 134 N.W.
Maeser v. COOK, VOEGELE AND NELSON, PA 446 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Maeser v. COOK, VOEGELE AND NELSON, PA 446 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Glaser v. Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Association, (citing Hubachek v. Maxbass Security Bank, 117 Minn. 163, 169 , 134 N.W.
Lucas v. Independent School District No. 284 433 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1988
Lucas v. Independent School District No. 284 433 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1988
Bank, 117 Minn. 163, 168-69 , 134 N.W.
Lucas v. Independent School District No. 284 419 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lucas v. Independent School District No. 284 419 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Hubachek v. Maxbass Security Bank, 117 Minn. 163, 169 , 134 N.W.
Tara Hills Condominium Ass'n v. Gaughan 399 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tara Hills Condominium Ass'n v. Gaughan 399 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Target Stores, Inc. v. Twin Plaza Co., 277 Minn. 481, 497 , (emphasis added) (quoting Hubachek v. Maxbass Security Bank, 117 Minn. 163, 169 , 134 N.W.
Glaser v. Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 389 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Glaser v. Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 389 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hubachek v. Maxbass Security Bank, 117 Minn. 163, 169 , 134 N.W.
Brock v. Jernigan 505 P.2d 1052 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Target Stores, Inc. v. Twin Plaza Co. 153 N.W.2d 832 Minn. 1967
Target Stores, Inc. v. Twin Plaza Co. 153 N.W.2d 832 Minn. 1967
In Hubachek v. Maxbass Security Bank, 117 Minn. 163, 169 , , we said: “* * * A marketable title * * * is one that is free from reasonable doubt; one that a prudent person, with full knowledge of all the facts, would be willing to accept.
Kirsch v. Kahn 149 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1967
Kirsch v. Kahn 149 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1967
Under the circumstances in this case, it is not suggested, as in Hubachek v. Maxbass Security Bank, 117 *299 Minn. 163, , that there are outstanding rights of third parties to whose claims the purchaser may be subjected by future litigation and upon which the court is not competent to pass.
Miller v. Snedeker 101 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1960
Miller v. Snedeker 101 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1960
5 On marketability of title, see Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , , 3 L. R. A. 739, 12 A. S. R. 736; Hedderly v. Johnson, supra; Austin v. Barnum, 52 Minn. 136 , ; Howe v. Coates, supra; Stacey v. Taylor, 196 Minn. 202 , ; Hubachek v. Maxbass Security Bank, 117 Minn. 163 , .
City of North Mankato v. Carlstrom 2 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1942
City of North Mankato v. Carlstrom 2 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1942
As 'pointed out in many cases, here and elsewhere, the term “marketable title” jis applied to real estate (Hubachek v. Maxbass Security Bank, 117 Minn. 163, 168 , , Ann. Cas.
Geray v. Mahnomen Land Co. 173 N.W. 871 Minn. 1919
Geray v. Mahnomen Land Co. 173 N.W. 871 Minn. 1919
723; Hubacheck v. Maxbass Security Bank, 117 Minn. 163 , , Ann. Cas.
Nostdal v. Morehart 157 N.W. 584 Minn. 1916
Nostdal v. Morehart 157 N.W. 584 Minn. 1916
Mackey v. Ames, 31 Minn. 103 , ; Heisley v. Swanstrom, 40 Minn. 196 , ; Joslyn v. Schwend, 85 Minn. 130 , ; Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , ; Hubechek v. Maxbass Security Bank, 117 Minn. 163 , , Ann. Cas.