DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 136 N.W. 871.

31 citing documents.

  • Fritz v. Fritz 377 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Fritz v. Fritz 377 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255, 261-62 , 136 N.W.
  • Dietz v. Dietz 70 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1955
  • Dietz v. Dietz 70 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1955
    21 Because of the peculiar nature of agreements for support, we have held that such contracts are sui generis, and their breach not to be tolerated “by a refinement upon technical rules and principles of law.” 22 Thus in Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255, 261 , , we said: *336 “* * * without regard to the form of the agreement, where property is conveyed by voluntary conveyance, with the understanding that the grantee will, by way of consideration therefor, furnish support and maintenance for
  • Klick v. Fearing 55 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1952
  • Distinguished Klick v. Fearing 55 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1952
    Plaintiff relies principally upon Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255 , .
  • Lieder v. Straub 42 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1950
  • Manemann v. West 13 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1944
  • Manemann v. West 13 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1944
    608; Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255 , ; Priebe v. Sette, 197 Minn. 453 , .
  • Young v. Blandin 9 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1943
  • Young v. Blandin 9 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1943
    Co. 122 Minn. 400 , ; Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255 , ; Ekberg v. Swedish-Am.
  • Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co. 285 N.W. 809 Minn. 1939
  • Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co. 285 N.W. 809 Minn. 1939
    201 , it was remarked that the fact that defendant's position had not changed to his detriment did not necessarily defeat the defense of laches; but in Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255 , 136 N.W.
  • Allen v. Allen 283 N.W. 558 Minn. 1939
  • Allen v. Allen 283 N.W. 558 Minn. 1939
    “Support and maintenance such as may be due from a child to a parent is something which courts cannot well cause to be specifically performed, and when a child breaches an agreement in this respect the most appropriate remedy is as a rule the one to annul and rescind the conveyance executed in consideration for such support and maintenance.” Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255 , .
  • Brotton v. Donovan 224 N.W. 270 Minn. 1929
  • Brotton v. Donovan 224 N.W. 270 Minn. 1929
    Co. 86 Minn. 140 , ; Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255 , ; In re Estate of Barlow, 152 Minn. 249 , ; O’Brien v. Lien, 160 Minn. 276 , .
  • Hatcher v. Union Trust Co. of Maryland 219 N.W. 76 Minn. 1928
  • Hatcher v. Union Trust Co. of Maryland 219 N.W. 76 Minn. 1928
    Payne v. Loan & Guaranty Co. 54 Minn. 255 , ; Hillside Cemetery Assn. v. Holmes, 97 Minn. 261 , ; Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255 , ; Ulferts v. Thissen, 163 Minn. 173 , .
  • Briggs v. Buzzell 264 N.W. 548 Minn. 1925
  • Briggs v. Buzzell 264 N.W. 548 Minn. 1925
    In McQueen v. Burhans, 77 Minn. 382 , , it was remarked that the fact that defendant’s position had not changed to his detriment did not necessarily defeat the defense of laches; but in Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255 , , we find this language: “Delay must be culpable in order to become laches, and prejudice must result.” The latter statement appeals to reason, for, so long as the parties are in the same condition as they were before the delay occurred, it matters little whether the plaintif
  • Wilson ex rel. Mitchell v. Erickson 180 N.W. 93 Minn. 1920
  • Wilson ex rel. Mitchell v. Erickson 180 N.W. 93 Minn. 1920
    471; Brown v. Strom, 113 Minn. 1 , ; Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255 , .
  • Walsh v. Walsh 174 N.W. 835 Minn. 1919
  • Walsh v. Walsh 174 N.W. 835 Minn. 1919
    Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255 , .
  • Odenbreit v. Utheim 154 N.W. 741 Minn. 1915
  • Odenbreit v. Utheim 154 N.W. 741 Minn. 1915
    Mousseau v. Mosseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255 , ; Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L.R.A.
  • O'Rourke v. O'Rourke 153 N.W. 607 Minn. 1915
  • O'Rourke v. O'Rourke 153 N.W. 607 Minn. 1915
    In Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255 , , the court, in referring to the application of the remedies of a court of equity to cases involving situations resulting from family settlements, and speaking from the viewpoint of the wronged parents, said: “The rules concerning the application of this equitable remedy are quite well settled in this
  • State v. Roby 150 N.W. 793 Minn. 1915
  • State v. Roby 150 N.W. 793 Minn. 1915
    434; Coles v. Shepard, 30 Minn. 446 , ; Maataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255, 260 , .