Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Havel v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad, 139 N.W. 137.

27 citing documents.

Cameron v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 48 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1951
Cameron v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 48 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1951
L. R. Co. 120 Minn. 195 , 139 N. *360 W. 137.
Lunz v. Gordon 48 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1951
Lunz v. Gordon 48 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1951
L. R. Co. 120 Minn. 195 , ; Hedlund v. Minneapolis St.
Bryant v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 23 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1946
Bryant v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 23 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1946
L. R. Co. 120 Minn. 195 , ; Sloniker v. G. N. Ry.
Carlson v. Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. 273 N.W. 665 Minn. 1937
Raths v. Sherwood 262 N.W. 563 Minn. 1935
Raths v. Sherwood 262 N.W. 563 Minn. 1935
L. R. Co. 120 Minn. 195 , ; Johnson v. D. W. & P. Ry.
Hinkle v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cayuna Range Railway Co. 202 N.W. 340 Minn. 1925
Hinkle v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cayuna Range Railway Co. 202 N.W. 340 Minn. 1925
L. R. Co. 120 Minn. 195 , .
Greisch v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 199 N.W. 517 Minn. 1924
Greisch v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 199 N.W. 517 Minn. 1924
L. R. Co. 120 Minn. 195 , , cited by plaintiff is not in point.
Anderson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 185 N.W. 661 Minn. 1921
Anderson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 185 N.W. 661 Minn. 1921
L. R. Co. 120 Minn. 195 , .
Elvidge v. Stronge & Warner Co. 181 N.W. 346 Minn. 1921
Elvidge v. Stronge & Warner Co. 181 N.W. 346 Minn. 1921
L. R. Co. 120 Minn. 195 , .
Kaiser v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 181 N.W. 569 Minn. 1920
Kaiser v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 181 N.W. 569 Minn. 1920
L. R. Co. 120 Minn. 195 , , and cases cited, where it is held that wilful negligence “is a reckless disregard of the safety of the person or property of another, by failing, after discovering .the peril, to exercise ordinary care to prevent the impending injury.” Richard Green was called by plaintiff as a witness.
Knapp v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 166 N.W. 409 Minn. 1918
Knapp v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 166 N.W. 409 Minn. 1918
Louis R. Co. 120 Minn. 195 , and Gill v. Minneapolis, St.
Ashe v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 164 N.W. 803 Minn. 1917
Ashe v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 164 N.W. 803 Minn. 1917
Louis R. Co. 120 Minn. 195 , ; Palon v. Great Northern Ry.
Darrington v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 158 N.W. 727 Minn. 1916
Darrington v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 158 N.W. 727 Minn. 1916
L. R. Co. 120 Minn. 195 , , to the point that the engineer’s testimony as to the time he first saw Darrington is not conclusive.
Hanks v. Great Northern Railway Co. 154 N.W. 1088 Minn. 1915
Hanks v. Great Northern Railway Co. 154 N.W. 1088 Minn. 1915
Louis R. Co. 120 Minn. 195 , .