DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 141 N.W. 481.

26 citing documents.

  • Schimmelpfennig v. Gaedke 27 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1947
  • Schimmelpfennig v. Gaedke 27 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1947
    Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , .
  • Sievers v. Sievers 250 N.W. 574 Minn. 1933
  • Sievers v. Sievers 250 N.W. 574 Minn. 1933
    Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , ; Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , .
  • Benedict v. Pfunder 237 N.W. 2 Minn. 1931
  • Benedict v. Pfunder 237 N.W. 2 Minn. 1931
    There “the complaint ivas upon both implied and express contract,” and proof of either was admissible “so long as both allegations stood.” It was not seen “how this double form of pleading imposed any unfair burden on defendant in this case.” Doubt was expressed whether an election was properly compelled, citing Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , .
  • Waggoner v. Gummerum 231 N.W. 10 Minn. 1930
  • Waggoner v. Gummerum 231 N.W. 10 Minn. 1930
    Morrow v. Porter, 161 Minn. 396 , ; Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , ; Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , .
  • Dale v. First National Bank of Rushmore 227 N.W. 501 Minn. 1929
  • Dale v. First National Bank of Rushmore 227 N.W. 501 Minn. 1929
    121 Minn. 352 , ; Morrow v. Porter, 161 Minn. 396 , , and cases cited in those decisions.
  • Heinrich Chemical Co. v. Estate of Bennes 205 N.W. 948 Minn. 1925
  • Heinrich Chemical Co. v. Estate of Bennes 205 N.W. 948 Minn. 1925
    Grant that this was error under the decisions of Redding v. Godwin, 44 Minn. 355 , ; Madson v. Madson, 69 Minn. 37 , ; and other cases cited in Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352, 354 , , it should not reverse, because it relates only to the consideration, an immaterial issue, the verdict, demonstrably being predicated wholly upon misrepresentation inducing the making of the contract.
  • Geisler v. Geisler 200 N.W. 742 Minn. 1924
  • Geisler v. Geisler 200 N.W. 742 Minn. 1924
    Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , , and cases cited.
  • Canellos v. Zotalis 177 N.W. 133 Minn. 1920
  • Canellos v. Zotalis 177 N.W. 133 Minn. 1920
    Illustrations of a double statement of *295 facts constituting but one' cause of action may be found in Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , , and Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth F. L. Co. 124 Minn. 416 , .
  • Schwantz v. Kleiber 170 N.W. 210 Minn. 1919
  • Schwantz v. Kleiber 170 N.W. 210 Minn. 1919
    1009; Larson v. Lund, 109 Minn. 372 , ; Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , .
  • Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. Swenson 166 N.W. 406 Minn. 1918
  • Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. Swenson 166 N.W. 406 Minn. 1918
    Kruta v. Lough, 131 Minn. 13 , 154 N. W. *367 514 ; Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352, 356 , ; Dermott v. Jones, 2 Wall.
  • Kruta v. Lough 154 N.W. 514 Minn. 1915
  • Kruta v. Lough 154 N.W. 514 Minn. 1915
    Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , ; Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 124 Minn. 416 , ; Lufkin v. Harvey, 125 Minn. 458 , ; Meyer v. Saterbak, 128 Minn. 304 , .
  • Meyer v. Saterbak 150 N.W. 901 Minn. 1915
  • Meyer v. Saterbak 150 N.W. 901 Minn. 1915
    Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , .
  • Lufkin v. Harvey 147 N.W. 444 Minn. 1914
  • Lufkin v. Harvey 147 N.W. 444 Minn. 1914
    Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , .