DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Weingarth, 144 N.W. 745.

18 citing documents.

  • Loucks v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 246 N.W. 893 Minn. 1933
    *191 Our authorities dealing with the application of the rule that an employer is only liable for the wrongful act of his employe when it is done in the coxirse of and within the scope of his employment are partially collated in Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , .
  • Marcel v. Cudahy Packing Co. 243 N.W. 265 Minn. 1932
    Elliason v. Western C. & C. Co. 162 Minn. 213 , ; Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , ; Sina v. Carlson, 120 Minn. 283 , .
  • Pearson v. Northland Transportation Co. 239 N.W. 602 Minn. 1931
    Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , ; Richardson v. Weiss, 152 Minn. 391 , ; Ahlberg v. Griggs, 158 Minn. 11 , ; Martin v. Schiska, 183 Minn. 256 , .
  • Lund v. Olson 237 N.W. 188 Minn. 1931
    R. 796 (the team intrusted generally to the servant for driving on the streets); Langworthy v. Owens, 116 Minn. 342 , Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , (family car which the son was usually permitted to drive); Fransen v. Kellogg T. C. F. Co. 150 Minn. 54 , (servant intrusted generally with a delivery truck); Behrens v. Hawkeye Oil Co. 151 Minn. 478 , Stoneman v. Washburn-Crosby Co. 153 Minn. 331 , (l
  • Messenbring, Sr. v. Blackwood 213 N.W. 541 Minn. 1927
    N. W. 929 ; Stoneman v. Washburn-Croshy Co. 153 Minn. 331 , ; Piepho v. M. Sigbert-Awes Co. 152 Minn. 315 , ; Behrens v. Hawkeye Oil Co. 151 Minn. 478 , ; Moore v. P. J. Downes Co. 150 Minn. 333 , ; Robinson v. Pence Automobile Co. 140 Minn. 332 , ; Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , ; Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , ; Slater v. Advance Thresher Co. 97 Minn. 305 , , 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 598.
  • Elliason v. Western Coal & Coke Co. 202 N.W. 485 Minn. 1925
    See Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 -173, .
  • Ahlberg v. Griggs 196 N.W. 652 Minn. 1924
    Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169, 174 , .
  • Piepho v. M. Sigbert-Awes Co. 188 N.W. 998 Minn. 1922
    Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , .
  • Moore v. P. J. Downes Co. 185 N.W. 395 Minn. 1921
    Ploetz v. Holt, 134 Minn. 169 , .
  • Fransen v. Kellogg Toasted Corn Flake Co. 184 N.W. 364 Minn. 1921
    Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , ; Johnson v. Evans, 141 Minn. 356 , , 2 A.L.R.
  • Menton v. L. Patterson Mercantile Co. 176 N.W. 991 Minn. 1920
    The facts bring the case within the recent decision in Mogle v. A. W. Scott Co. 144 Minn. 173 , , where we declined to extend the doctrine applicable to the “family automobile,” as first announced in Ploetz v. Holt, 134 Minn. 169 , , and followed in numerous subsequent cases, to a case involving facts like those in the case *312 at bar.
  • Johnson v. Smith 173 N.W. 675 Minn. 1919
    Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , ; Kayser v. Van Nest, 125 Minn. 277 , , 51 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Johnson v. Evans 170 N.W. 220 Minn. 1919
    Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , ; Kayser v. Van Nest, 125 Minn. 277 , , 51 L.R.A.
  • Uphoff v. McCormick 166 N.W. 788 Minn. 1918
    Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , , and cases cited; Jensen v. Fischer, 134 Minn. 366 , .
  • Provo v. Conrad 153 N.W. 753 Minn. 1915
    598; Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , ; Kayser v. Van Nest, 125 Minn. 277 , ; Geiss v. Twin City Taxicab Co. 120 Minn. 368 , , 45 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Brennan v. Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railway Co. 153 N.W. 611 Minn. 1915
    Co. 100 Minn. 202 , ; Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , .
  • Nelson v. Halland 149 N.W. 194 Minn. 1914
    This duty or obligation is imposed by law upon any person operating an automobile upon the public streets or country roads (Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169, 171 , ; Pfeiffer v. Radke, 142 Wis.
  • Kayser v. Van Nest 146 N.W. 1091 Minn. 1914
    *279 113; Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , ; McNeal v. McKain, 33 Okla.