Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Boeing v. Owsley, 142 N.W. 129.

43 citing documents.

Matter of Estate of Shapiro 380 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1986
Matter of Estate of Shapiro 380 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1986
607 (1940); In re Owsley’s Estate, 122 Minn. 190 , 142 N.W.
Matter of Estate of Shapiro 362 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Estate of Shapiro 362 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re Owsley’s Estate, 122 Minn. 190, 202-03 , 142 N.W.
Tjanetopoulos v. Margares 98 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1959
Tjanetopoulos v. Margares 98 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1959
Co. v. Parker, 105 Minn. 310 , ; Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , .
Bozied v. Edgerton 58 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1953
Bozied v. Edgerton 58 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1953
Co. 89 Minn. 41 , ; Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , ; First Nat.
State v. DeZeler 41 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1950
State v. Longyear Holding Co. 29 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1947
State v. Longyear Holding Co. 29 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1947
Co. 143 Minn. 271 , ; Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , ; and State v. Royal Mineral Assn. 132 Minn. 232 , , Ann. Cas.
In Re Estate of Hencke 19 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1945
In Re Estate of Hencke 19 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1945
last resort of that State.” Much the same kind of arguments and contentions were also made in the former Hencke case ( 212 Minn. 415 , 4 N. W. [2d] 357), where we held that real estate of a nonresident located here, not sold in the course of administration, should “be assigned under our law either under the will, if there be one, or under our statutes of descent.” We there cited Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190, 199 , , holding ( 212 Minn. 414 , 4 N. W. [2d] 357) “that the statutes contemplated a
Forster v. First & American National Bank 4 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1942
In Re Estate of Hencke 4 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1942
Forster v. First & American National Bank 4 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1942
In Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190, 199 , , we held that the statutes contemplated a sale of a nonresident’s real estate only “for debts and charges to which it is subject under the laws of this state.” In accord, Hobson v. Payne, 45 Ill.
In Re Estate of Hencke 4 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1942
In Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , 199 , 142 N.W.
McDonnall v. Drawz 3 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1942
McDonnall v. Drawz 3 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1942
In Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , , we in effect adopted the construction of the statutes just indicated by holding that a husband’s right as statutory heir under R. L. 1905, § 3648, now part of § 8992-29(2), to inherit ancestral property of his wife, was not affected by R. L. 1905, § 3652, the statutory predecessor of § 8992-30, citin
Carey v. Brown 260 N.W. 320 Minn. 1935
In Re Estate of Carey 260 N.W. 320 Minn. 1935
Carey v. Brown 260 N.W. 320 Minn. 1935
Tracy v. Tracy, 79 Minn. 267 , ; Nordquist v. Sahlbom, 114 Minn. 329 , ; Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , ; Butler v. Butler, 180 Minn. 134 , ; Dunnell, Minn. Prob.
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Brown 230 N.W. 780 Minn. 1930
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Brown 230 N.W. 780 Minn. 1930
Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , ; State v. Royal Mineral Assn. 132 Minn. 232 , , Ann. Cas.
Hentges v. Hoye 197 N.W. 852 Minn. 1924
Hentges v. Hoye 197 N.W. 852 Minn. 1924
Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , .
Barrett v. Heim 188 N.W. 207 Minn. 1922
Barrett v. Heim 188 N.W. 207 Minn. 1922
See also Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190, 200 , .
State v. Cavour Mining Co. 173 N.W. 415 Minn. 1919
State v. Cavour Mining Co. 173 N.W. 415 Minn. 1919
520; Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , ; State v. Royal Mineral Assn. 132 Minn. 232 , 156 N, W. 128, Ann. Cas.
State v. Hobart Iron Co. 172 N.W. 899 Minn. 1919
Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. v. Douglas 161 N.W. 158 Minn. 1917
Orr v. Bennett 161 N.W. 165 Minn. 1917
Orr v. Bennett 161 N.W. 165 Minn. 1917
Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190, 205 , .
Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. v. Douglas 161 N.W. 158 Minn. 1917
520; Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , , and State v. Royal Min.
Mechling v. McAllister 160 N.W. 1016 Minn. 1917
Mechling v. McAllister 160 N.W. 1016 Minn. 1917
Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , .
State v. Royal Mineral Ass'n 156 N.W. 128 Minn. 1916
State v. Royal Mineral Ass'n 156 N.W. 128 Minn. 1916
520; Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , .
State ex rel. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. v. Probate Court 152 N.W. 845 Minn. 1915
State ex rel. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. v. Probate Court 152 N.W. 845 Minn. 1915
So, in referring to the election statute, Justice Philip E. Brown, in Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , [ ], said: “It confers no substantive right, but merely provides for a statutory estoppel to set at rest, after the expiration of the prescribed period, all question as to whether the survivor has elected to take under the will and not under the statute, the failure to elect within such time being ‘equ
Twitchell v. Cummings 143 N.W. 785 Minn. 1913
Twitchell v. Cummings 143 N.W. 785 Minn. 1913
520; Boeing v. Owsley, 122 Minn. 190 , .