DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Knight v. Martin, 144 N.W. 941.

28 citing documents.

  • In re Estate of Beecham 361 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • In re Estate of Beecham 361 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    at 673 , citing Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , 144 N.W.
  • Wilcox v. Schloner 23 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1946
  • Wilcox v. Schloner 23 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1946
    1927, § 9495); Hemstad v. Hall, 64 Minn. 136 , ; Sayer v. Harris Produce Co. 84 Minn. 216 , ; Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , ; Wilcox v. Wiggins, 166 Minn. 124 , ; Krocak v. Krocak, 189 Minn. 346 , .
  • Raspler v. Seng 11 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1943
  • Raspler v. Seng 11 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1943
    1927, § 9495); Hemstad v. Hall, 64 Minn. 136 , ; Sayer v. Harris Produce Co. 84 Minn. 216 , ; Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , ; Wilcox v. Wiggins, 166 Minn. 124 , ; Krocak v. Krocak, 189 Minn. 346 , .
  • Docken v. Ryan 6 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1942
  • In Re Estate of Edward Hirt 6 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1942
  • Docken v. Ryan 6 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1942
    1914B, 381; Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , ; In re Estate of Anderson, 199 Minn. 588 , .
  • In Re Estate of Edward Hirt 6 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1942
    1914B, 381; Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , 144 N.W.
  • In re Estate of Anderson 273 N.W. 89 Minn. 1937
  • In re Estate of Anderson 273 N.W. 89 Minn. 1937
    1914B, 381, about evidence of such .uncertain bearing holds true here.” Attention may also be called to the opinion in Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191, 194 , , wherein it is stated: “The presumption cannot be overcome by such evidence as this.
  • Hage v. Crookston Trust Co. 272 N.W. 777 Minn. 1937
  • Hage v. Crookston Trust Co. 272 N.W. 777 Minn. 1937
    Knight v. Martin, 124 *536 Minn. 191, ; Lansing v. Gregory, 128 Minn. 496 , ; Thysell v. McDonald, 134 Minn. 400 , , Ann. Cas.
  • Smith v. Hansen 219 N.W. 151 Minn. 1928
  • Smith v. Hansen 219 N.W. 151 Minn. 1928
    As supporting the contention of error appellant cites Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , ; Wagner v. Seaberg, 138 Minn. 37 , ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , ; In re Estate of Klessig, 153 Minn. 27 , .
  • Neutgens v. Rehmann 212 N.W. 943 Minn. 1927
  • Neutgens v. Rehmann 212 N.W. 943 Minn. 1927
    Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , ; Thysell v. McDonald, 134 Minn. 400 , , Ann. Cas.
  • Wilcox v. Wiggins 207 N.W. 23 Minn. 1926
  • Wilcox v. Wiggins 207 N.W. 23 Minn. 1926
    Hemstad v. Hall, 64 Minn. 136 , ; Netzer v. City of Crookston, 66 Minn. 355 , ; Sayer v. Harris Produce Co. 84 Minn. 216 , ; Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , ; Bowder v. Gillis, 132 Minn. 189 , ; Funkley v. Ridgway, 158 Minn. 265 , .
  • Funkley v. Ridgway 197 N.W. 280 Minn. 1924
  • Funkley v. Ridgway 197 N.W. 280 Minn. 1924
    Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , .
  • Johnson v. Kistler 197 N.W. 671 Minn. 1923
  • Johnson v. Kistler 197 N.W. 671 Minn. 1923
    Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , , and cases there cited.
  • Klessig v. Lea 189 N.W. 424 Minn. 1922
  • Klessig v. Lea 189 N.W. 424 Minn. 1922
    Appellant’s case seems more attenuated than in Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , , where this court held it insufficient to sustain a verdict.
  • Thysell v. McDonald 159 N.W. 958 Minn. 1916
  • Thysell v. McDonald 159 N.W. 958 Minn. 1916
    1914B, 381; Knight v. Martin, 124 Minn. 191 , ; Lansing v. Gregory, 128 Minn. 496 , .