Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mitton v. Cargill Elevator Co., 144 N.W. 434.
-
Minn. 2021
257, 259 –61 (Minn. 1938) (upholding jury verdict on proximate cause based on the theory—supported solely by circumstantial evidence —that a faulty handrail caused decedent to fall down a stair way); Mitton v. Cargill Elevator Co. , –36 (Minn. 1913) (concluding that plaintiff had introduced sufficient circumstantial evidence of the condition and location of a steep stairway to send the question of proximate cause to a jury despite lack of eyewitness evidence).
- Muckler v. Buchl 150 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
-
Muckler v. Buchl
150 N.W.2d 689
Minn. 1967
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262 , 109 N. W. (2d) 754 , 88 A. L. R. (2d) 1080; MacIntosh v. G. N. Ry.
- Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 133 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
-
Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc.
133 N.W.2d 484
Minn. 1965
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; McElroy v. Board of Education, 184 Minn. 357 , ; Sherman v. Minnesota Mutual Life Ins.
- State v. Smith 119 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1962
-
State v. Smith
119 N.W.2d 838
Minn. 1962
Co. 124 Minn. 65, 71 , .
- State v. Bell 115 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1962
-
State v. Bell
115 N.W.2d 468
Minn. 1962
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Johnson v. Crookston Lbr.
- Majerus v. Guelsow 113 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1962
-
Majerus v. Guelsow
113 N.W.2d 450
Minn. 1962
Co. 124 Minn. 65, 71 , , 436: “* * * Plaintiff was not required to prove causal connection by direct evidence.
- Oelke v. County of Faribault 110 N.W.2d 145 Minn. 1961
- Oelke v. County of Faribault 110 N.W.2d 145 Minn. 1961
- Lindgren v. Voge 109 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1961
-
Lindgren v. Voge
109 N.W.2d 754
Minn. 1961
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Id.
- McCarthy's St. Louis Park Cafe, Inc. v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'n 104 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1960
-
McCarthy's St. Louis Park Cafe, Inc. v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'n
104 N.W.2d 895
Minn. 1960
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Johnson v. Crookston Lbr.
- Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246 91 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
- Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246 91 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
- Hallada v. Great Northern Railway 69 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1955
- Hallada v. Great Northern Railway 69 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1955
- Standafer v. First National Bank 68 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1955
-
Standafer v. First National Bank
68 N.W.2d 362
Minn. 1955
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Id.
- Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co. 18 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1945
-
Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co.
18 N.W.2d 121
Minn. 1945
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Ferch v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 208 Minn. 9 , ; Horovitz, Workmen’s Compensation (1944) pp. 133-134; Sawyer’s Case, 315 Mass. 75 , 51 N. E. (2d) 949; F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Industrial Acc.
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Andrews 297 N.W. 848 Minn. 1941
- McDermott v. Minneapolis, Northfield & Southern Railway Co. 283 N.W. 116 Minn. 1938
-
McDermott v. Minneapolis, Northfield & Southern Railway Co.
283 N.W. 116
Minn. 1938
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. *220 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407, the issue of proximate cause was for the jury.
- Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 279 N.W. 257 Minn. 1938
-
Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc.
279 N.W. 257
Minn. 1938
Co. 124 Minn. 65, 71 , (Id.
- Guild v. Miller 271 N.W. 332 Minn. 1937
-
Guild v. Miller
271 N.W. 332
Minn. 1937
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , (second appeal 129 Minn. 449 , ); Hunter v. C. St.
- Barich v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance 255 N.W. 80 Minn. 1934
- Barich v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance 255 N.W. 80 Minn. 1934
- Stadtherr v. City of Sauk Center 231 N.W. 210 Minn. 1930
-
Stadtherr v. City of Sauk Center
231 N.W. 210
Minn. 1930
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Id.
- Hunter v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 230 N.W. 793 Minn. 1930
-
Hunter v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
230 N.W. 793
Minn. 1930
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , 144 N.W.
- Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 215 N.W. 678 Minn. 1927
- Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 215 N.W. 678 Minn. 1927
- MacIntosh v. Great Northern Railway Co. 188 N.W. 551 Minn. 1922
-
MacIntosh v. Great Northern Railway Co.
188 N.W. 551
Minn. 1922
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Crandall v. Chicago G. W. R. Co. 127 Minn. 498 , ; Kludzinski v. Great Northern Ry.
- McNamee v. Hines 184 N.W. 675 Minn. 1921
-
McNamee v. Hines
184 N.W. 675
Minn. 1921
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Crandall v. Chicago G. W. Ry.
- Castle v. Union Pacific Railroad 166 N.W. 767 Minn. 1918
-
Castle v. Union Pacific Railroad
166 N.W. 767
Minn. 1918
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Hurley v. Illinois Cent.
- Lentz v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railroad 160 N.W. 794 Minn. 1917
-
Lentz v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railroad
160 N.W. 794
Minn. 1917
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Strasser v. Stabeck, 112 Minn. 90 , ; O’Neil v. Potts, 130 Minn. 353 , .
- Thompson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 158 N.W. 42 Minn. 1916
-
Thompson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad
158 N.W. 42
Minn. 1916
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Lewis v. Chicago G. W. R. Co. 124 Minn. 487 , ; Crandall v. Chicago G. W. R. Co. 127 Minn. 498 , ; Diebel v. Wolpert, Davis & Co. 129 Minn. 77 , ; Fitzgerald v. Armour & Co. 129 Minn. 81 , ; Kludzinski v. Great Northern Ry.