Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Meland v. Youngberg, 145 N.W. 167.

35 citing documents.

Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLC 909 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLC 909 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
See Freeman v. Duluth Clinic, Ltd. , , 629 (Minn. 1983) ("[F]raud in the inducement, if proved, would vitiate the parties' contract."); Meland v. Youngberg , 124 Minn. 446 , 145 N.W.
State v. Florence 239 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1976
Graves v. Haugen, 124 Minn. 456 , State ex rel.
Berryman v. Riegert 175 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1970
Berryman v. Riegert 175 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1970
See Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , , Ann. Cas.
City of Coon Rapids v. Suburban Engineering, Inc. 167 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1969
City of Coon Rapids v. Suburban Engineering, Inc. 167 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1969
See Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , , Ann. Cas.
Sawyer v. Tildahl 148 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1967
Sawyer v. Tildahl 148 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1967
The testimony of plaintiffs was: “We determined from the basis of what Mr. Glisan told us that we would make the Tildahls an offer” and that “if he [Glisan] had indicated he had any knowledge [of a water problem in the basement], I would have been not interested in buying the home.” It was pointed out in Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446, 454 , , that “[t]his court * * * in consonance with the weight of authority has held that, if the buyer, instead of investigating as fully as he might, made o
Love v. Anderson 61 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1953
Love v. Anderson 61 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1953
9 Spiess v. Brandt, 230 Minn. 246 , 41 N. W. (2d) 561 , 27 A. L. R. (2d) 1; Gaetke v. Ebarr Co. Inc. 195 Minn. 393 , ; Wann v. Northwestern Trust Co. 120 Minn. 493 , ; Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , ; Flaherty v. Till, 119 Minn. 191 , ; Brown v. Manning, 3 Minn. 13 (35); 8 Dunnell, Dig.
DeWitt v. Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n 10 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1943
DeWitt v. Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n 10 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1943
The case would appear to be governed by Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446, 451, 455 , , Ann. Cas.
Rother v. Hiniker 294 N.W. 644 Minn. 1940
Rother v. Hiniker 294 N.W. 644 Minn. 1940
See *408 Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , , Ann. Cas.
Osborn v. Will 236 N.W. 197 Minn. 1931
Osborn v. Will 236 N.W. 197 Minn. 1931
Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , , Ann. Cas.
Nilsen v. Farmers State Bank of Van Hook 228 N.W. 152 Minn. 1929
Nilsen v. Farmers State Bank of Van Hook 228 N.W. 152 Minn. 1929
Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , , Ann. Cas.
Chippewa County State Bank v. Kief 215 N.W. 833 Minn. 1927
Distinguished Chippewa County State Bank v. Kief 215 N.W. 833 Minn. 1927
This case is also distinguishable from that of Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , , Ann. Cas.
State Ex Rel. Krinkie v. Felix 213 N.W. 556 Minn. 1927
Graves v. Haugen, 124 Minn. 456 , ; State ex rel.
Old Colony Life Insurance v. Moeglein 205 N.W. 885 Minn. 1925
Old Colony Life Insurance v. Moeglein 205 N.W. 885 Minn. 1925
Moline-Milburn Co. v. Franklin, 37 Minn. 137 , ; Marshall v. Gilman, 52 Minn. 88 , 53 * Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , , Ann. Cas.
Brees v. Anderson 191 N.W. 266 Minn. 1922
Brees v. Anderson 191 N.W. 266 Minn. 1922
If defendants’ claim of fraud rested solely on plaintiff’s statements as to the respective areas of the fields and of the pasture, we should be constrained to hold that the case came within the doctrine of Citizens State Bank v. Moebeck, 143 Minn. 291 , , and Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , , Ann. Cas.
Sorrells v. Clifford 204 P. 1013 Ariz. 1922
Sampson v. Penney 187 N.W. 135 Minn. 1922
Sampson v. Penney 187 N.W. 135 Minn. 1922
See Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , ; Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , , Ann. Cas.
Eurich v. Bartlett 186 N.W. 138 Minn. 1922
Eurich v. Bartlett 186 N.W. 138 Minn. 1922
Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , , Ann. Cas.
Schmitt v. Ornes Esswein & Co. 183 N.W. 840 Minn. 1921
Schmitt v. Ornes Esswein & Co. 183 N.W. 840 Minn. 1921
Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , , Ann. Cas.
Kraus v. National Bank of Commerce of Mankato 167 N.W. 353 Minn. 1918
Kraus v. National Bank of Commerce of Mankato 167 N.W. 353 Minn. 1918
Meland v. Youngberg, 124 Minn. 446 , , Ann. Cas.