Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 143 N.W. 728.

31 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Turnbladh v. DISTRICT COURT OF RAMSEY COUNTY 107 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1960
State v. EAH 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
State v. E. A. H. 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
State v. EAH 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
E.g., Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231, 242 , 143 N.W.
State v. E. A. H. 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
E.g., Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231, 242 , .
Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co. 42 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1950
Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co. 42 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1950
See, Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231 , ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Tri-State Telephone and Telegraph Co. 284 N.W. 294 Minn. 1939
State v. Tri-State Telephone and Telegraph Co. 284 N.W. 294 Minn. 1939
289 U. S. 287 , 53 S. Ct. 637 , 77 L. ed. 1180; B. & O. R. Co. v. United States, 298 U. S. 349 , 56 S. Ct. 797 , 80 L. ed. 1209; United G. P. S. Co. v. Texas, 303 U. S. 123 , 58 S. Ct. 483 , 82 L. ed. 702; Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231 , .
School District No. 1 v. Lindhe 261 N.W. 486 Minn. 1935
School District No. 1 v. Lindhe 261 N.W. 486 Minn. 1935
Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231 , ; Twitchell v. Cummings, 128 Minn. 391 , .
Riebel v. Mueller 225 N.W. 924 Minn. 1929
Riebel v. Mueller 225 N.W. 924 Minn. 1929
742; Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231, 242 , ; Fletcher v. Southern Colonization Co. 148 Minn. 143, 149 , .
Neill v. City of Red Wing 195 N.W. 145 Minn. 1923
Neill v. City of Red Wing 195 N.W. 145 Minn. 1923
The late cases so holding are: Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231 , ; Potter v. Engler, 130 Minn. 510 , ; Borough of Belle Plaine v. Northern Power Co. 142 Minn. 361 , ; Goodrich v. Northwestern Tel.
Meyers v. City of Minneapolis 189 N.W. 709 Minn. 1922
Meyers v. City of Minneapolis 189 N.W. 709 Minn. 1922
Appellant cites the stay granted in Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231 , , as a precedent, but there a stay was given in the court' below which expired the day after the appeal was argued and on the day of the expiration of the stay this court on an application, to which apparently there was no opposition, granted a stay until a determination of the appeal.
First National Bank v. Village of Buhl 186 N.W. 306 Minn. 1922
First National Bank v. Village of Buhl 186 N.W. 306 Minn. 1922
Minneapolis Gas Light Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231 , .
Fletcher v. Southern Colonization Co. 181 N.W. 205 Minn. 1921
Fletcher v. Southern Colonization Co. 181 N.W. 205 Minn. 1921
Co. 93 Minn. 373 , ; Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231 , .
Flanery v. Kusha 179 N.W. 902 Minn. 1920
Flanery v. Kusha 179 N.W. 902 Minn. 1920
§ 410; Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231 , .
Borough of Belle Plaine v. Northern Power Co. 172 N.W. 217 Minn. 1919
Borough of Belle Plaine v. Northern Power Co. 172 N.W. 217 Minn. 1919
Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231 , ; Louisiana R. R. Comm.
Currie v. Silvernale 171 N.W. 782 Minn. 1919
Currie v. Silvernale 171 N.W. 782 Minn. 1919
Co. 53 Minn. 335 , ; Watters v. City of Mankato, 106 Minn. 161 , ; Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231 , .
Minneapolis Gas Light Co. v. City of Minneapolis 168 N.W. 588 Minn. 1918
Minneapolis Gas Light Co. v. City of Minneapolis 168 N.W. 588 Minn. 1918
After an adverse ruling by this court ( 123 Minn. 231 , ), the gas company effected a compromise with the city whereby a judgment was entered on April 8, 1914, by agreement of the parties, correcting and modifying the price to private consumers fixed in the ordinance so that the same should not exceed 80 cents per thousand cubic feet for and during the perio
Twitchell v. Cummings 151 N.W. 139 Minn. 1915
Twitchell v. Cummings 151 N.W. 139 Minn. 1915
A statement of the rule and a reference to many cases applying it will be found in Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231 , .