Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. Parker, 145 N.W. 964.

43 citing documents.

Master Asphalt Co. v. Voss Construction Co. 535 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1995
Master Asphalt Co. v. Voss Construction Co. 535 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1995
Knoff Woodwork Co. v. Zotalis, 213 Minn. 204, 206-07 , -66 (1942); Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107, 112 , 145 N.W.
Enviro-Fab, Inc. v. Blandin Paper Co. 349 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Enviro-Fab, Inc. v. Blandin Paper Co. 349 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , 145 N.W.
Central Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Holt 266 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1978
Central Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Holt 266 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1978
But cf. Northwestern Lumber & W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , 145 N.W.
Abex Corporation v. Commissioner of Taxation 207 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1973
Abex Corporation v. Commissioner of Taxation 207 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1973
& Wrecking Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107, 111 , we said: “When the question arises between landlord and tenant, different considerations enter into the case.
Rochester's Suburban Lumber Company v. Slocumb 163 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 1968
Rochester's Suburban Lumber Company v. Slocumb 163 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 1968
Frankoviz v. Smith, 34 Minn. 403 , ; American Bridge Co. v. Honstain, 120 Minn. 329 , ; Northwestern L. & W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , .
Ternes v. Westberg 75 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 1956
Ternes v. Westberg 75 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 1956
& Wrecking Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , .
Minnesota Home Rebuilding & Repair Co. v. Kraulik 67 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1954
Minnesota Home Rebuilding & Repair Co. v. Kraulik 67 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1954
& W. Co. v. Parker, 120 Minn. 107 , .
Knoff Woodwork Co. v. Zotalis 6 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1942
Knoff Woodwork Co. v. Zotalis 6 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1942
Cf. Northwestern L. & W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107, 113 , , where the holding was: “But painting and papering of the character done here, as part of a general plan of fitting up the premises for the initial occupancy of the tenant, are properly classed as improvements, and not repairs.” The two liens amount to only about $300, a matter of two months
Willcox Boiler Co. v. Messier 1 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1941
Willcox Boiler Co. v. Messier 1 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1941
& W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , ; Pond & Hasey Co. v. O’Connor, 70 Minn. 266 , .
Moffat v. White 279 N.W. 732 Minn. 1938
Moffat v. White 279 N.W. 732 Minn. 1938
& W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107, 111 , , to consider this question.
Sandberg v. Burns 270 N.W. 575 Minn. 1936
Sandberg v. Burns 270 N.W. 575 Minn. 1936
What this court said in Northwestern L. & W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107, 113 , , fits into the facts presented here: *474 “It is doubtless true that painting and papering done by a tenant at recurring periods during^ his tenancy properly come under the denomination of repairs.
Newton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 243 N.W. 684 Minn. 1932
Holland Furnace Co. v. Jefferson 216 N.W. 795 Minn. 1927
Holland Furnace Co. v. Jefferson 216 N.W. 795 Minn. 1927
& W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , , is not in conflict with the rules herein stated.
Lampert Lumber Co. v. Jeppeson 207 N.W. 22 Minn. 1926
Lampert Lumber Co. v. Jeppeson 207 N.W. 22 Minn. 1926
Lundell v. Ahlman, *87 53 Minn. 57 , ; Coughlan v. Longini, 77 Minn. 514 , ; Northwestern L. & W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , ; American Bridge Co. v. Honstain, 120 Minn. 329 , ; Frankoviz v. Smith, 34 Minn. 403 , .
Moorhead Lumber Co. v. Remington Packing Co. 206 N.W. 653 Minn. 1925
Moorhead Lumber Co. v. Remington Packing Co. 206 N.W. 653 Minn. 1925
The case cited by respondent viz: N. W. L. & W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , , is not squarely in point, for the record therein discloses that the chattel mortgage was not filed until after the lien right accrued.
St. Paul Trust Co. v. United States Cereal Co. 206 N.W. 385 Minn. 1925
St. Paul Trust Co. v. United States Cereal Co. 206 N.W. 385 Minn. 1925
Compare N. W. L. & W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , .
Berglund & Peterson v. Abram 182 N.W. 624 Minn. 1921
Berglund & Peterson v. Abram 182 N.W. 624 Minn. 1921
Martin Lumber Co. v. Howard, 49 Minn. 404 , ; Wheaton v. Berg, 50 Minn. 525 , ; Congdon v. Cook, 55 Minn. 1 , ; Northwestern L. & W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , .
Hanson v. Vose 175 N.W. 113 Minn. 1919
Hanson v. Vose 175 N.W. 113 Minn. 1919
Northwestern Lumber & W Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , .
Cohen v. Whitcomb 170 N.W. 851 Minn. 1919
Cohen v. Whitcomb 170 N.W. 851 Minn. 1919
See Pond & Hasey Co. v. O’Connor, 70 Minn. 266 , ; Shapira v. Barney, 30 Minn. 59 , ; Northwestern L. & W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , .
Heimbach Lumber Co. v. Spear 167 N.W. 1041 Minn. 1918
Heimbach Lumber Co. v. Spear 167 N.W. 1041 Minn. 1918
Frankoviz v. Smith, 34 Minn. 403 , ; American Bridge Co. v. Honstain, 120 Minn. 329 , ; Northwestern L. & W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , .
Paine & Nixon Co. v. Dahlvick 161 N.W. 257 Minn. 1917
Paine & Nixon Co. v. Dahlvick 161 N.W. 257 Minn. 1917
Frankoviz v. Smith, 34 Minn. 403 , ; American Bridge Co. v. Honstain, 120 Minn. 329 , ; North *59 western L. & W. Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , 145 N W. 964.
Pabst v. Ferch 147 N.W. 714 Minn. 1914
Pabst v. Ferch 147 N.W. 714 Minn. 1914
1 ; Farmers’ L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , ; 2 Notes on Minn. Reports, 665, and authorities there cited; Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , , 13 Am.