Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 148 N.W. 67.

55 citing documents.

Streambend Properties II, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , 148 N.W. 67, 68 (Minn. 1914) (holding that contract vendee 10 attempting to sue f or damages caused by vendor’ s misrepresentations “has no contract upon which to predicate damages” after cancellation of the contract for deed has occurred).
In Re Butler 552 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1996
Shields v. Goldetsky 552 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1996
In Re Butler 552 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1996
Co., 126 Minn. 229, 230-31 , 148 N.W.
Shields v. Goldetsky 552 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1996
Co., 126 Minn. 229, 230-31 , 148 N.W.
Extraordinary Learn. & Ed. v. BAPTIST CH. 430 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Extraordinary Learning & Educational Complex/Minneapolis Communiversity, Inc. v. New Bethel Baptist Church 430 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Extraordinary Learning & Educational Complex/Minneapolis Communiversity, Inc. v. New Bethel Baptist Church 430 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Olson v. Northern Pacific Railroad Co., 126 Minn. 229, 232 , 148 N.W.
Extraordinary Learn. & Ed. v. BAPTIST CH. 430 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Olson v. Northern Pacific Railroad Co., 126 Minn. 229, 232 , 148 N.W.
Hollywood Dairy, Inc. v. Timmer 411 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hollywood Dairy, Inc. v. Timmer 411 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
56.03 provides for summary judgment when “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and * * * either parly is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” In this case, any issue of material fact is irrelevant because summary judgment was rendered as a matter of law under the line of cases following Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 126 Minn. 229 , 148 N.W.
GILBERT BUILDERS v. COM. BANK OF DePERE 407 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
GILBERT BUILDERS v. COM. BANK OF DePERE 407 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
826, 827 (1930); Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 126 Minn. 229, 230-31 , 148 N.W.
Thomey v. Stewart 391 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Thomey v. Stewart 391 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
This court disagreed, affirming the district court and distinguishing the case from Olson v. Northern Pacific Railroad Co., 126 Minn. 229 , 148 N.W.
Hommerding v. Peterson 376 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hommerding v. Peterson 376 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
826, 827 (1930); Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 126 Minn. 229, 232 , 148 N.W.
Gatz v. Frank M. Langenfeld & Sons Construction, Inc. 356 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Gatz v. Frank M. Langenfeld & Sons Construction, Inc. 356 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
826, 827 (1930); Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 126 Minn. 229, 230-31 , 148 N.W.
D.J. Enterprises of Garrison, Inc. v. Blue Viking, Inc. 352 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
D.J. Enterprises of Garrison, Inc. v. Blue Viking, Inc. 352 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co., 126 Minn. 229 , 148 N.W.
Raach v. Haverly 269 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1978
Raach v. Haverly 269 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1978
Co., 126 Minn. 229 , 148 N.W.
McGee v. Breezy Point Estates 166 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1969
McGee v. Breezy Point Estates 166 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1969
Co. 126 Minn. 229 , , L. R. A. 1915F, 962.
Liebsch v. Abbott 122 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1963
Liebsch v. Abbott 122 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1963
Co. 126 Minn. 229 , , L. R. A. 1915F, 962.
Northwest Hotel Corp. v. Henderson 100 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1959
Northwest Hotel Corp. v. Henderson 100 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1959
Co. *90 126 Minn. 229 , , L. R. A. 1915F, 962; West v. Walker, 181 Minn. 169 , , 74 A. L. R. 165; Houchin v. Braham Investment Co. 202 Minn. 540 , , 120 A. L. R. 1152.
Gable v. Niles Holding Co. 296 N.W. 525 Minn. 1941
Gable v. Niles Holding Co. 296 N.W. 525 Minn. 1941
Co. 126 Minn. 229 , , L. R. A. 1915F, 962, where it was held that the complaint did not state a cause of action for money had and received, but in that respect is like Woodward v. Western Canada Colonization Co. 134 Minn. 8 , , L. R. A. 1917C, 270, where a contract for the purchase of a farm was entered into
Houchin v. Braham Investment Co. 279 N.W. 370 Minn. 1938
Houchin v. Braham Investment Co. 279 N.W. 370 Minn. 1938
Co. 126 Minn. 229 , , L. R. A. 1915F, 962; note, 31 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Olive v. Taylor 234 N.W. 466 Minn. 1931
Olive v. Taylor 234 N.W. 466 Minn. 1931
Co. 126 Minn. 229 , , L. R. A. 1915F, 962, reviewed and reaffirmed in West v. Walker, 181 Minn. 169 , .
West v. Walker 231 N.W. 826 Minn. 1930
Distinguished West v. Walker 231 N.W. 826 Minn. 1930
Co. 126 Minn. 229 , , L. R. A. 1915F, 962, where it was held that a right of action for damages for fraudulent representations inducing the purchase of land upon an executory contract does not survive the.
Moorhead Investment Co. v. Carlson 224 N.W. 842 Minn. 1929
Moorhead Investment Co. v. Carlson 224 N.W. 842 Minn. 1929
Co. 126 Minn. 229 , , L. R. A. 1915F, 962; Andresen v. Simon, 171 Minn. 168 , ; Smith v. Dristig, 176 Minn. 601 , .
Smith v. Dristig 224 N.W. 157 Minn. 1929
Smith v. Dristig 224 N.W. 157 Minn. 1929
Co. 126 Minn. 229 , , L. R. A. 1915F, 962; Needles v. Keys, 149 Minn. 477 , ; Andresen v. Simon, 171 Minn. 168 , 213 N. W 563.
Andresen v. Simon 213 N.W. 563 Minn. 1927
Andresen v. Simon 213 N.W. 563 Minn. 1927
Co. 126 Minn. 229 , , L. R. A. 1915F, 962; Needles v. Keys, 149 Minn. 477 , ; Nolan v. Greeley, 150 Minn. 441 , .
Follingstad v. Syverson 200 N.W. 90 Minn. 1924
Follingstad v. Syverson 200 N.W. 90 Minn. 1924
Co. 126 Minn. 229 , , L. R. A. 1915F, 962, where it was held that, although a contract for the sale of land may be induced by fraud of the vendor, the vendee cannot recover damages, after a statutory cancelation, even to the extent of the purchase price actually paid.
Seerup v. Goraczkowski 199 N.W. 94 Minn. 1924
Seerup v. Goraczkowski 199 N.W. 94 Minn. 1924
Co. 126 Minn. 229 , , L. R. A. 1915F, 962; Freeman v. Fehr, 132 Minn. 384 , .
Townsend v. Jahr 179 N.W. 486 Minn. 1920
Townsend v. Jahr 179 N.W. 486 Minn. 1920
Co. 126 Minn. 229 , , L.R.A.
Humphrey v. Sievers 163 N.W. 737 Minn. 1917