Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kommerstad v. Great Northern Railway Co., 146 N.W. 975.

32 citing documents.

Allison v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 62 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1954
Allison v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 62 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1954
Co. 125 Minn. 297, 299 , ], that under the present statute plaintiff could not 'have appealed from the whole order had the defendant’s motion for judgment been granted’ must be regarded as inadvertent and contrary to the rule established by the Peterson case [Peterson v. Minneapolis St.
Schaumburg v. Ludwig 60 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1953
Schaumburg v. Ludwig 60 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1953
Hicks v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 58 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 1953
Hicks v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 58 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 1953
Co. 125 Minn. 297 , , and Drcha v. G. N. Ry.
In Re Estate of Halweg 290 N.W. 577 Minn. 1940
Vavricka v. Schmitt 290 N.W. 577 Minn. 1940
Vavricka v. Schmitt 290 N.W. 577 Minn. 1940
Co. 125 Minn. 297 , ; Snyder v. Minnetonka & W. B. Navigation Co. 151 Minn. 36 , .
In Re Estate of Halweg 290 N.W. 577 Minn. 1940
Co. 125 Minn. 297 , 146 N.W.
Rieke v. St. Albans Land Co. 229 N.W. 557 Minn. 1930
Rieke v. St. Albans Land Co. 229 N.W. 557 Minn. 1930
Co. 125 Minn. 297 , ; Snyder v. M. & W. B. Navigation Co. 151 Minn. 36 , ; Lincoln v. Ravicz, 174 Minn. 237 , .
Drcha v. Great Northern Railway Co. 226 N.W. 846 Minn. 1929
Drcha v. Great Northern Railway Co. 226 N.W. 846 Minn. 1929
Co. 125 Minn. 297 , ; Snyder v. M. & W. B. N. Co. 151 Minn. 36 , , citing Greenberg v. National Council, 132 Minn. 84 , ; Snure v. Joseph Schlitz Brg.
Morton v. Griggs, Cooper & Co. 203 N.W. 218 Minn. 1925
Morton v. Griggs, Cooper & Co. 203 N.W. 218 Minn. 1925
Co. 125 Minn. 297 , ; Greenberg v. National Council, 132 Minn. 84 , ; Snure v. Joseph Schlitz B. Co. 139 Minn. 516 , ; and Snyder v. Minnetonka & W. B. Nav.
Snyder v. Minnetonka & White Bear Navigation Co. 185 N.W. 959 Minn. 1921
Snyder v. Minnetonka & White Bear Navigation Co. 185 N.W. 959 Minn. 1921
Co. 125 Minn. 297 , , and cases following it.
Barwald v. Thuet 182 N.W. 719 Minn. 1921
Barwald v. Thuet 182 N.W. 719 Minn. 1921
Co. 125 Minn. 297 , ; Heide v. Lyons, 128 Minn. 488 , ; Montee v. Great Northern Ry.
Schommer v. Eischens 182 N.W. 166 Minn. 1921
Schommer v. Eischens 182 N.W. 166 Minn. 1921
Co. 125 Minn. 297 , ; Greenberg v. National Council of K. & L. of S. 132 Minn. 84 , ; Pust v. Holtz, 134 Minn. 266 , .
Snure v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. 166 N.W. 1068 Minn. 1918
Snure v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. 166 N.W. 1068 Minn. 1918
Co. 125 Minn. 297 , , it was held that an order refusing to grant judgment notwithstanding the verdict, but granting a new trial, was not appealable, unless it appeared that the order had been based exclusively upon the ground of errors occurring at the trial, as the right to appeal from an order granting a new trial give
Greenberg v. National Council of Knights and Ladies of Security 155 N.W. 1053 Minn. 1916
Greenberg v. National Council of Knights and Ladies of Security 155 N.W. 1053 Minn. 1916
Co. 125 Minn. 297 , , in which it is held that an appeal may not be taken from an order granting a new trial, except where the new trial is granted for errors of law occurring at the trial and in such case only, and that an order denying judgment notwithstanding the verdict is not appealable.
Ness v. Supreme Lodge of Order of Columbian Knights 152 N.W. 1102 Minn. 1915
Ness v. Supreme Lodge of Order of Columbian Knights 152 N.W. 1102 Minn. 1915
Montee v. Great Northern Railway Co. 151 N.W. 1101 Minn. 1915
Montee v. Great Northern Railway Co. 151 N.W. 1101 Minn. 1915
Co. 125 Minn. 297 , ; Heide v. Lyons, 128 Minn. 488 , .
Hansen v. Great Northern Railway Co. 146 N.W. 976 Minn. 1914
Hansen v. Great Northern Railway Co. 146 N.W. 976 Minn. 1914
Co. supra, page 297, , the appeal is dismissed.