Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite International Realty & Securities Corp. v. Vanderpoel, 148 N.W. 895.

26 citing documents.

Extraordinary Learn. & Ed. v. BAPTIST CH. 430 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Extraordinary Learning & Educational Complex/Minneapolis Communiversity, Inc. v. New Bethel Baptist Church 430 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Extraordinary Learn. & Ed. v. BAPTIST CH. 430 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
67, 68-9 (1914); International Realty and Securities Corp. v. Vanderpoel, 127 Minn. 89, 92 , 148 N.W.
Extraordinary Learning & Educational Complex/Minneapolis Communiversity, Inc. v. New Bethel Baptist Church 430 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
67, 68-9 (1914); International Realty and Securities Corp. v. Vanderpoel, 127 Minn. 89, 92 , 148 N.W.
West v. Walker 231 N.W. 826 Minn. 1930
West v. Walker 231 N.W. 826 Minn. 1930
• Besides the two cases above cited, the Olson case has been recognized as stating the law in this state in International R. & S. Corp. v. Vanderpoel, 127 Minn. 89 , ; Seerup v. Goraczkowski, 159 Minn. 364 , ; Andresen v. Simon, 171 Minn. 168 , ; Smith v. Dristig, 176 Minn. 601 , ; Blythe v. Kujawa, 177 Minn. 79 , ; Moorhead.
Ross v. Amiret Farmers Elevator Co. 226 N.W. 417 Minn. 1929
Ross v. Amiret Farmers Elevator Co. 226 N.W. 417 Minn. 1929
That the mere bringing of an unsuccessful action on a given theory is not a conclusive election of remedies is recognized in In re Van Norman, 41 Minn. 494 , ; Marshall v. Gilman, 52 Minn. 88 , ; International R. & S. Corp. v. Vanderpoel, 127 Minn. 89 , ; Freeman v. Fehr, 132 Minn. 384 , ; and George A. Hormel Co. v. First Nat.
Blythe v. Kujawa 224 N.W. 464 Minn. 1929
Blythe v. Kujawa 224 N.W. 464 Minn. 1929
International R. & S. Corp. v. Vanderpoel, 127 Minn. 89 , ; Gunderson v. Halvorson, 140 Minn. 292 , ; 2 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Geo. A. Hormel Company v. First National Bank 212 N.W. 738 Minn. 1927
Geo. A. Hormel Company v. First National Bank 212 N.W. 738 Minn. 1927
Mohler v. Chamber of Commerce, 130 Minn. 288 , ; International R. & S. Corp. v. Vanderpoel, 127 Minn. 89 , ; In re Van Norman, 41 Minn. 494 , ; Freeman v. Fehr, 132 Minn. 384 , ; Virtue v. Creamery Pkg.
Central Union Trust Co. of N.Y. v. Blank 210 N.W. 34 Minn. 1926
Central Union Trust Co. of N.Y. v. Blank 210 N.W. 34 Minn. 1926
See Lilienthal v. Tordoff, 154 Minn. 225, 230 , , ; Nolan v. Greeley, 150 Minn. 441 , ; International R. & S. Corp. v. Vanderpoel, 127 Minn. 89, 92 , .
Follingstad v. Syverson 200 N.W. 90 Minn. 1924
Follingstad v. Syverson 200 N.W. 90 Minn. 1924
In International R. & S. Corp. v. Vanderpoel, 127 Minn. 89 , , it was pointed out that damages for fraud inducing the purchase of real estate cannot be applied upon the price unless the vendee so elects.
Lynch v. Higgins 191 N.W. 422 Minn. 1923
Lynch v. Higgins 191 N.W. 422 Minn. 1923
International R. & S. Corp. v. Vanderpoel, 127 Minn. 89 , ; or a statutory strict foreclosure.
Lilienthal v. Tordoff 194 N.W. 722 Minn. 1922
Lilienthal v. Tordoff 194 N.W. 722 Minn. 1922
S. 1913, § 8081, has been likened to a statutory foreclosure, International R. & S. Corp. v. Vanderpoel, 127 Minn. 89 , , or a statutory strict foreclosure, Nolan v. Greeley, 150 Minn. 441 , .
Kremer v. Lewis 163 N.W. 732 Minn. 1917
Kremer v. Lewis 163 N.W. 732 Minn. 1917
Co. 40 Minn. 424 , ; In re Van Norman, 41 Minn. 494 , ; Marshall v. Gilman, 52 Minn. 88 , ; International Realty & S. Corp. v. Van *371 derpoel, 127 Minn. 89 , ; Freeman v. Fehr, 133 Minn. 384 , 157 N W. 587.
Freeman v. Fehr 157 N.W. 587 Minn. 1916
Mathwig v. Strand 157 N.W. 589 Minn. 1916
Freeman v. Fehr 157 N.W. 587 Minn. 1916
Marshall v. Gilman, 53 Minn. 88 , ; International Realty & Securities Corp. v. Vanderpoel, 137 Minn. 89 , .
Mathwig v. Strand 157 N.W. 589 Minn. 1916
Hage v. Benner, 111 Minn. 365 , 127 N W. 3; First State Bank of Boyd v. Hayden, 121 Minn. 45 , 140 N W. 132; International Realty & Securities Corp. v. Vanderpoel, 127 Minn. 89 , .