Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 150 N.W. 908.

36 citing documents.

Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLC 790 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 2010
Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLC 790 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 2010
See Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, see also Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261, 268 , 150 N.W.
Koza v. RYAN DEVELOPMENT, INC. 384 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Koza v. RYAN DEVELOPMENT, INC. 384 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261, 266 , 150 N.W.
Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. v. Walsh 370 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1985
Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. v. Walsh 370 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1985
See Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , 150 N.W.
Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. v. Walsh 357 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. v. Walsh 357 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261, 263 , 150 N.W.
Dunham Associates, Inc. v. Group Investments, Inc. 223 N.W.2d 376 Minn. 1974
Dunham Associates, Inc. v. Group Investments, Inc. 223 N.W.2d 376 Minn. 1974
In the case of Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , we were first confronted with a case that involved the right of an architect to a lien on land where the plans were not used but the building project was abandoned by the owner.
M. E. Kraft Excavating & Grading Co. v. Barac Construction Co. 156 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1968
M. E. Kraft Excavating & Grading Co. v. Barac Construction Co. 156 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1968
Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 204.
Reuben E. Johnson Co. v. Phelps 156 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1968
Reuben E. Johnson Co. v. Phelps 156 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1968
Thus, in Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 204, we held that an architect had a lien against the owner of premises for services, rendered in preparing plans for a building, even though the building was never constructed.
National Lumber Co. v. Farmer & Son, Inc. 87 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1957
National Lumber Co. v. Farmer & Son, Inc. 87 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1957
In Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 204, the defendants employed architects to design and construct a budding.
Sterling Electric Co. v. Kent 45 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1951
Sterling Electric Co. v. Kent 45 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1951
See, Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261, 269 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 204; A. Y. McDonald Mfg.
Carr-Cullen Co. v. Deming 222 N.W. 507 Minn. 1928
Carr-Cullen Co. v. Deming 222 N.W. 507 Minn. 1928
Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 204.
Landers-Morrison-Christenson Co. v. Ambassador Holding Co. 214 N.W. 503 Minn. 1927
Landers-Morrison-Christenson Co. v. Ambassador H. Co. 214 N.W. 502 Minn. 1927
Landers-Morrison-Christenson Co. v. Ambassador Holding Co. 214 N.W. 503 Minn. 1927
Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 204.
Landers-Morrison-Christenson Co. v. Ambassador H. Co. 214 N.W. 502 Minn. 1927
Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , 150 N.W.
Botsford Lumber Co. v. Fuller 212 N.W. 22 Minn. 1927
Botsford Lumber Co. v. Fuller 212 N.W. 22 Minn. 1927
Moorhead Lumber Co. v. Remington Packing Co. 165 Minn. 411 , ; Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 204.
Jandrich v. Svabek 211 N.W. 957 Minn. 1927
Jandrich v. Svabek 211 N.W. 957 Minn. 1927
However, we have held to the contrary in Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 204, where the question was thoroughly considered and we think rightly decided.
Burner v. Northwestern Bible & Missionary Training School 201 N.W. 939 Minn. 1925
Burner v. Northwestern Bible & Missionary Training School 201 N.W. 939 Minn. 1925
Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 204.
Lampert Lumber Co. v. Thanning 197 N.W. 269 Minn. 1924
Lampert Lumber Co. v. Thanning 197 N.W. 269 Minn. 1924
Co. v. Hormel, 61 Minn. 303 , ; Thompson-McDonald Lumber Co. v. Morawetz, 127 Minn. 277 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 302; Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 204; Minneapolis Sash & Door Co. v. Hedden, 131 Minn. 31 , .
Berglund & Peterson v. Abram 182 N.W. 624 Minn. 1921
Berglund & Peterson v. Abram 182 N.W. 624 Minn. 1921
Krengel v. Haslam, 118 Minn. 506 , ; Lindquist v. Young, 119 Minn. 219 , ; Atlas Lumber Co. v. Dupuis, 125 Minn. 45 , ; Johnson v. Starrett, 127 Minn. 138 , ; Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , .
Erickson v. Ireland 158 N.W. 918 Minn. 1916
Erickson v. Ireland 158 N.W. 918 Minn. 1916
The claim of the lien claimants to priority under this statute is based wholly on the decision in Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , , L.r.A.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by