DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pennington v. Roberge, 142 N.W. 710.

38 citing documents.

  • Dwinnell v. Oftedahl 51 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1952
  • Dwinnell v. Oftedahl 51 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1952
    See, Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 129 Minn. 145 , Jacobson v. C. M. & St.
  • E. E. Atkinson Co. v. Neisner Brothers, Inc. 258 N.W. 151 Minn. 1935
  • E. E. Atkinson Co. v. Neisner Brothers, Inc. 258 N.W. 151 Minn. 1935
    We need only refer to Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , 142 N.W.
  • Burzinski v. Kinyon Investment Co. 256 N.W. 233 Minn. 1934
  • Burzinski v. Kinyon Investment Co. 256 N.W. 233 Minn. 1934
    But assume for the purposes of this decision that there was a sufficient variance in the description of the security as a $12,000 first mortgage and as it reads to justify rescission under the rule of Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Fawkes v. Knapp, 138 Minn. 384 , ; Saupe v. St.
  • Sommers v. City of St. Paul 237 N.W. 427 Minn. 1931
  • Sommers v. City of St. Paul 237 N.W. 427 Minn. 1931
    1913A, 854; Wunder v. Turner, 120 Minn. 13 , ; Wann v. N. W. Trust Co. 120 Minn. 493 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Freeburg v. Honemann, 126 Minn. 52 , ; Berndt v. Berndt, 127 Minn. 238 , ; Barnum v. White, 128 Minn. 58 , , .
  • Magnuson v. Bouck 220 N.W. 702 Minn. 1929
  • Magnuson v. Bouck 220 N.W. 702 Minn. 1929
    Nelson v. Carlson, 54 Minn. 90 , ; Ludowese v. Amidon, 124 Minn. 288 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Fawkes v. Knapp, 138 Minn. 384 , ; Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , ; Saupe v. St.
  • Becker v. Bundy 225 N.W. 290 Minn. 1929
  • Becker v. Bundy 225 N.W. 290 Minn. 1929
    “A purchaser is entitled to rescind when he does not get what he, from the seller’s representations, believed, he was getting.” Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295, 299 , .
  • Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co. 212 N.W. 892 Minn. 1927
  • Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co. 212 N.W. 892 Minn. 1927
    Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Drake v. Fairmont D. T. & B. Co. 129 Minn. 145 , ; Fawkes v. Knapp, 138 Minn. 384 , ; Labar v. Lindstrom, 158 Minn. 453 , ; Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , .
  • Hirschman v. Healy 202 N.W. 734 Minn. 1925
  • Hirschman v. Healy 202 N.W. 734 Minn. 1925
    Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; Knappen v. Freeman, 47 Minn. 491 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Fawkes v. Scott, 138 Minn. 384 , ; Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , .
  • Kirby v. Dean 199 N.W. 174 Minn. 1924
  • Kirby v. Dean 199 N.W. 174 Minn. 1924
    To the same effect are Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Ludowese v. Amidon, 124 Minn. 288 , ;, Fawkes v. Knapp, 138 Minn. 384 , , and other cases too numerous for citation.
  • Labar v. Lindstrom 197 N.W. 756 Minn. 1924
  • Labar v. Lindstrom 197 N.W. 756 Minn. 1924
    Lindquist v. Gibbs, 122 Minn. 205 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Drake v. Fairmont D. T. & B. Co. 129 Minn. 145 , ; Ludowese v. Amidon, 124 Minn. 288 , .
  • Dau v. Burnham 193 N.W. 33 Minn. 1923
  • Dau v. Burnham 193 N.W. 33 Minn. 1923
    Hayden v. Albee, 20 Minn. 143 (159); Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , .
  • First National Bank v. Blocker 185 N.W. 292 Minn. 1921
  • First National Bank v. Blocker 185 N.W. 292 Minn. 1921
    1918A, 355; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , .
  • Fawkes v. Knapp 165 N.W. 236 Minn. 1917
  • Fawkes v. Knapp 165 N.W. 236 Minn. 1917
    Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; MacLaren v. Cockran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Ludowese v. Amidon, 124 Minn. 288 , .
  • Straabe v. Jackson 158 N.W. 915 Minn. 1916
  • Straabe v. Jackson 158 N.W. 915 Minn. 1916
    See cases cited in Lindquist v. Gibbs, 122 Minn. 205 , , and Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , .
  • Woodward v. Western Canada Colonization Co. 158 N.W. 706 Minn. 1916
  • Woodward v. Western Canada Colonization Co. 158 N.W. 706 Minn. 1916
    And see Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Zimmerman v. Burchard-Hulburt Inv.
  • Kempf v. Ranger 155 N.W. 1059 Minn. 1916
  • Kempf v. Ranger 155 N.W. 1059 Minn. 1916
    The law on this subject will be found fully discussed in Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; Pennington v. Eoberge, 122 Minn. 295 , , and Drake v. Fairmont D. T. & B. Co. 129 Minn. 145 , .
  • Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 151 N.W. 914 Minn. 1915
  • Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 151 N.W. 914 Minn. 1915
    We held in Pennington, v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , , an action to rescind, that it was not necessary to prove the existence of a purpose to defraud.
  • Freeburg v. Honemann 147 N.W. 827 Minn. 1914
  • Freeburg v. Honemann 147 N.W. 827 Minn. 1914
    See cases cited under 1 Dunnell, Minn. Digest, § 411; Wunder v. Turner, 120 Minn. 13 , ; Wann v. Northwestern Trust Co. 120 Minn. 493 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , .
  • Ludowese v. Amidon 144 N.W. 965 Minn. 1914
  • Ludowese v. Amidon 144 N.W. 965 Minn. 1914
    Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; Knappen v. Freeman, 47 Minn. 491 , ; Nelson v. Carlson, 54 Minn. 90 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , .