Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rustad v. Great Northern Railway Co., 142 N.W. 727.

30 citing documents.

Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co. 344 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1984
Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co. 344 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1984
Rustad v. Great Northern Railway Co., 122 Minn. 453 , 142 N.W.
Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co. 288 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1980
Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co. 288 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1980
See Rustad v. Great Northern Railway Co., 122 Minn. 453 , 142 N.W.
Wallinga v. Johnson 131 N.W.2d 216 Minn. 1964
Wallinga v. Johnson 131 N.W.2d 216 Minn. 1964
Co. 122 Minn. 453 , , the rule in Minnesota has been that where the plaintiff has shown a bailment relationship to exist, the defendant must assume not only the burden of going *439 forward with evidence to show lack of negligence but also the burden of ultimate persuasion.
Murphy v. Co-operative Laundry Co. of St. Paul, Inc. 41 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1950
Murphy v. Co-operative Laundry Co. of St. Paul, Inc. 41 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1950
Co. 122 Minn. 453 , ; Steenson v. Flour City F. & T. Co. 144 Minn. 375 , ; Stine v. Hines, 148 Minn. 132 , ; West v. First State Bank, 158 Minn. 342 , ; Harding v. Shapiro, 165 Minn. 248 , ; White v. Sullivan, 174 Minn. 549 , ; Solberg v. Minneapoli
Wilson v. Moline 38 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1949
Wilson v. Moline 38 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1949
Co. 122 Minn. 453, 456 , .
Zanker v. Cedar Flying Service, Inc. 7 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1943
Zanker v. Cedar Flying Service, Inc. 7 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1943
Co. 122 Minn. 453, 456 , ; Peet v. Roth Hotel Co. 191 Minn. 151, 156 , ; Hoel v. Flour City F. & T. Co. 144 Minn. 280 , .
Peet v. the Roth Hotel Co. 253 N.W. 546 Minn. 1934
Peet v. the Roth Hotel Co. 253 N.W. 546 Minn. 1934
Co. 122 Minn. 453 , ) puts upon the bailee the burden of proving that the loss did not result from his negligence.
Cargill Grain Co. v. Cleveland-Cliffs Steamship Co. 235 N.W. 268 Minn. 1931
Cargill Grain Co. v. Cleveland-Cliffs Steamship Co. 235 N.W. 268 Minn. 1931
Co. 122 Minn. 453, 456 , .
White v. Sullivan 219 N.W. 908 Minn. 1928
White v. Sullivan 219 N.W. 908 Minn. 1928
Co. 122 Minn. 453 , ; Harding v. Shapiro, 165 Minn. 248 , , and cases cited; 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Anderson v. M. Burg & Sons, Inc. 212 N.W. 9 Minn. 1927
Anderson v. M. Burg & Sons, Inc. 212 N.W. 9 Minn. 1927
Co. 122 Minn. 453 , ; Schommer v. Flour City O. I. W. 129 Minn. 244 , ; Greenhut Cloak Co. v. Oreck, 130 Minn. 304 , ; Hughes v. Globe Ind.
Wellberg v. Duluth Auto Supply Co. 177 N.W. 924 Minn. 1920
Wellberg v. Duluth Auto Supply Co. 177 N.W. 924 Minn. 1920
Co. 122 Minn. 453 , ; Hoel v. Flour City F. & F. Co. 144 Minn. 280 , —its conduct as a bailee may subject it to liability for conversion.
Steenson v. Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co. 175 N.W. 681 Minn. 1920
Steenson v. Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co. 175 N.W. 681 Minn. 1920
Hoel v. Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co. 175 N.W. 300 Minn. 1919
Hoel v. Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co. 175 N.W. 300 Minn. 1919
Co. 122 Minn. 453 , , we had the question of the liability of the railway company defendant as a warehouseman for the loss of property in its possession.
National Elevator Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co. 170 N.W. 515 Minn. 1919
National Elevator Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co. 170 N.W. 515 Minn. 1919
Rustad v. Great Northern Railway Co. 149 N.W. 304 Minn. 1914
Rustad v. Great Northern Railway Co. 149 N.W. 304 Minn. 1914
Tbe case was bere before and is reported in 122 Minn. 453 , .