Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lewis v. Johnson, 143 N.W. 1127.

27 citing documents.

S. M. Hentges & Sons, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Where a contract within the statute of frauds is made out by correspondence, the correspondence taken together must establish the contract in all its terms,” without any “aid from parol evidence.”
McLaughlin v. Heikkila 697 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
McLaughlin v. Heikkila 697 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
1072, 1073 (1917) (“To establish a contract for the sale of real property by correspondence, there must be a definite offer in writing and an unconditional and unqualified written acceptance of the offer.”); Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409, 412 , 143 N.W.
Crince v. Kulzer 498 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Crince v. Kulzer 498 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409, 411 , 143 N.W.
TRIPLE B & G, INC. v. City of Fairmont 494 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
TRIPLE B & G, INC. v. City of Fairmont 494 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409, 411 , 143 N.W.
Schwinn v. Griffith 303 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1981
Schwinn v. Griffith 303 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1981
140 (1934); Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409 , 143 N.W.
Callender v. Kalscheuer 184 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1971
Callender v. Kalscheuer 184 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1971
Cf. Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409 , .
Haugland v. Canton 84 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1957
Haugland v. Canton 84 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1957
4 Minar v. Skoog, 235 Minn. 262 , 50 N. W. (2d) 300 ; Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 150; Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; Langellier v. Schaefer, 36 Minn. 361 , .
Ruble v. Ruble 47 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 1951
Ruble v. Ruble 47 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 1951
Langellier v. Schaefer, 36 Minn. 361 , 31 N. W. *17 690; Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 150; Henry Simons Lbr.
Henry Simons Lumber Co. v. Simons 44 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1950
Henry Simons Lumber Co. v. Simons 44 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1950
Bank, 165 Minn. 143 , ; Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 150; Johnson v. M. J. O’Neil, Inc. 182 Minn. 232 , ; Crabtree v. St.
New England Mutual Life Insurance v. Mannheimer Realty Co. 247 N.W. 803 Minn. 1933
New England Mutual Life Insurance v. Mannheimer Realty Co. 247 N.W. 803 Minn. 1933
Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 150.
Brearley v. Schoening 210 N.W. 588 Minn. 1926
Brearley v. Schoening 210 N.W. 588 Minn. 1926
Lanz v. McLaughlin, 14 Minn. 55 (72); Hamlin v. Wistar, 31 Minn. 418 , ; Langellier v. Schaefer, 36 Minn. 361 , ; Ames & Frost Co. v. Smith, 65 Minn. 304 , ; Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 150; Rahm v. Cummings, 131 Minn. 141 , ; Kull v. Wilson, 137 Minn. 127 , ; Lloyd v. Mickelson, supra, page 441.
West v. First National Bank of Rolfe 205 N.W. 949 Minn. 1925
West v. First National Bank of Rolfe 205 N.W. 949 Minn. 1925
Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 150.
Lowry Coffee Co. v. Andresen-Ryan Coffee Co. 190 N.W. 985 Minn. 1922
Lowry Coffee Co. v. Andresen-Ryan Coffee Co. 190 N.W. 985 Minn. 1922
Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 150.
Nelson v. Rohweder 180 N.W. 223 Minn. 1920
Nelson v. Rohweder 180 N.W. 223 Minn. 1920
In this re'spect the case is ruled by Lewis v. Johnson, 133 Minn. 409 , , L.R.A.