Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bond v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 144 N.W. 942.

26 citing documents.

Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co. 909 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 2018
Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co. 909 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 2018
Co. , 124 Minn. 195 , 144 N.W.
SINGELMAN v. St. Francis Medical Center 777 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
SINGELMAN v. St. Francis Medical Center 777 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Co., 124 Minn. 195, 197, 201-02 , 144 N.W.
Leek v. American Express Property Casualty 591 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Leek v. American Express Property Casualty 591 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., 124 Minn. 195, 203 , 144 N.W.
Davis v. Furlong 328 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1983
Davis v. Furlong 328 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1983
431, 432-33 (1924); Bond v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 124 Minn. 195, 198 , 144 N.W.
Doerr v. Warner 76 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 1956
Doerr v. Warner 76 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 1956
1 Rules of Civil Procedure, Eule 3.01; Minnesota Eules of Civil Procedure, Tentative Draft, p. 2; Bond v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 124 Minn. 195, Goodman v. Ancient Order of United Workmen, 211 Minn. 181 , .
Berghuis v. Korthuis 37 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1949
Berghuis v. Korthuis 37 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1949
150; Bond v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 124 Minn. 195 , ; In re Estate of Daniel, 208 Minn. 420 , ; Cashman v. Hedberg, 215 Minn. 463 , 10 N. W. (2d) 388 ; see, also, 16 Am.
Wangensteen v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1944
Wangensteen v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1944
Bond v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 124 Minn. 195, 202 , .
Thompson Yards, Inc. v. Standard Home Building Co. 201 N.W. 300 Minn. 1924
Thompson Yards, Inc. v. Standard Home Building Co. 201 N.W. 300 Minn. 1924
It is true that in McCormick v. Robinson, 139 Minn. 483 , , following Bond v. P. R. Co. 124 Minn. 195 , , section 7707 was given a broad application to all ordinary civil actions pursuant to which they are “deemed as begun for all purposes when the summons is delivered to the proper officer for service, if such service be completed within the time prescribed by law.” But whatever else may be said of it
Weston v. Jones 199 N.W. 431 Minn. 1924
Weston v. Jones 199 N.W. 431 Minn. 1924
§ 1546; Bond v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 124 Minn. 195 , .
In re Appeal of Meyer from Confirmation of Paving Assessment 197 N.W. 970 Minn. 1924
In re Appeal of Meyer from Confirmation of Paving Assessment 197 N.W. 970 Minn. 1924
Bank, 89 N. Y. 397 ; Auerbach v. Maynard, 26 Minn. 421 , ; Bond v. Pennsylvania, 124 Minn. 195, 199 , ; State v. Morrison, 132 Minn. 454 , .
Spotts v. Beebe 182 N.W. 167 Minn. 1921
Spotts v. Beebe 182 N.W. 167 Minn. 1921
R. Co. 124 Minn. 195 , ; McCormick v. Robinson, 139 Minn. 483 , .
Wagner v. Farmers Co-operative Exchange Co. of Good Thunder 180 N.W. 231 Minn. 1920
Wagner v. Farmers Co-operative Exchange Co. of Good Thunder 180 N.W. 231 Minn. 1920
3, § 7845, provides that, “at the time of issuing the summons” or at any time thereafter, a plaintiff may have the assistance of the writ, then adds: “The action must be begun as prescribed in § 7707 not later than 60 days after issuance of the writ.” That the action was already begun when the writ issued, within the purview-of section 7707, is so clearly determined by Bond v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 124 Minn. 195 , , and McCormick v. Robinson, 139 Minn. 483 , , that no further comment is needed.
McCormick v. Robinson 167 N.W. 271 Minn. 1918
McCormick v. Robinson 167 N.W. 271 Minn. 1918
We gave this statute careful consideration in Bond v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 124 Minn. 195 , , and reached the conclusion that where the provisions of the statute were complied with, the action was deemed begun when the summons was delivered to the proper officer for service, not merely for the purpose of avoiding the bar of the statute of limitations, but for all purposes.