Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mitton v. Cargill Elevator Co., 144 N.W. 434.

66 citing documents.

Minn. 2021
257, 259 –61 (Minn. 1938) (upholding jury verdict on proximate cause based on the theory—supported solely by circumstantial evidence —that a faulty handrail caused decedent to fall down a stair way); Mitton v. Cargill Elevator Co. , –36 (Minn. 1913) (concluding that plaintiff had introduced sufficient circumstantial evidence of the condition and location of a steep stairway to send the question of proximate cause to a jury despite lack of eyewitness evidence).
Muckler v. Buchl 150 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
Muckler v. Buchl 150 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Lindgren v. Voge, 260 Minn. 262 , 109 N. W. (2d) 754 , 88 A. L. R. (2d) 1080; MacIntosh v. G. N. Ry.
Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 133 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 133 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; McElroy v. Board of Education, 184 Minn. 357 , ; Sherman v. Minnesota Mutual Life Ins.
State v. Smith 119 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1962
State v. Smith 119 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1962
Co. 124 Minn. 65, 71 , .
State v. Bell 115 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1962
State v. Bell 115 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1962
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Johnson v. Crookston Lbr.
Majerus v. Guelsow 113 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1962
Majerus v. Guelsow 113 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1962
Co. 124 Minn. 65, 71 , , 436: “* * * Plaintiff was not required to prove causal connection by direct evidence.
Oelke v. County of Faribault 110 N.W.2d 145 Minn. 1961
Oelke v. County of Faribault 110 N.W.2d 145 Minn. 1961
Lindgren v. Voge 109 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1961
Lindgren v. Voge 109 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1961
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Id.
McCarthy's St. Louis Park Cafe, Inc. v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'n 104 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1960
McCarthy's St. Louis Park Cafe, Inc. v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'n 104 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1960
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Johnson v. Crookston Lbr.
Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246 91 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246 91 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
Hallada v. Great Northern Railway 69 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1955
Hallada v. Great Northern Railway 69 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1955
Standafer v. First National Bank 68 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1955
Standafer v. First National Bank 68 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1955
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Id.
Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co. 18 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1945
Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co. 18 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1945
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Ferch v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 208 Minn. 9 , ; Horovitz, Workmen’s Compensation (1944) pp. 133-134; Sawyer’s Case, 315 Mass. 75 , 51 N. E. (2d) 949; F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Industrial Acc.
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Andrews 297 N.W. 848 Minn. 1941
McDermott v. Minneapolis, Northfield & Southern Railway Co. 283 N.W. 116 Minn. 1938
McDermott v. Minneapolis, Northfield & Southern Railway Co. 283 N.W. 116 Minn. 1938
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. *220 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407, the issue of proximate cause was for the jury.
Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 279 N.W. 257 Minn. 1938
Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 279 N.W. 257 Minn. 1938
Co. 124 Minn. 65, 71 , (Id.
Guild v. Miller 271 N.W. 332 Minn. 1937
Guild v. Miller 271 N.W. 332 Minn. 1937
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , (second appeal 129 Minn. 449 , ); Hunter v. C. St.
Barich v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance 255 N.W. 80 Minn. 1934
Barich v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance 255 N.W. 80 Minn. 1934
Stadtherr v. City of Sauk Center 231 N.W. 210 Minn. 1930
Stadtherr v. City of Sauk Center 231 N.W. 210 Minn. 1930
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Id.
Hunter v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 230 N.W. 793 Minn. 1930
Hunter v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 230 N.W. 793 Minn. 1930
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , 144 N.W.
Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 215 N.W. 678 Minn. 1927
Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 215 N.W. 678 Minn. 1927
MacIntosh v. Great Northern Railway Co. 188 N.W. 551 Minn. 1922
MacIntosh v. Great Northern Railway Co. 188 N.W. 551 Minn. 1922
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Crandall v. Chicago G. W. R. Co. 127 Minn. 498 , ; Kludzinski v. Great Northern Ry.
McNamee v. Hines 184 N.W. 675 Minn. 1921
McNamee v. Hines 184 N.W. 675 Minn. 1921
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Crandall v. Chicago G. W. Ry.
Castle v. Union Pacific Railroad 166 N.W. 767 Minn. 1918
Castle v. Union Pacific Railroad 166 N.W. 767 Minn. 1918
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Hurley v. Illinois Cent.
Lentz v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railroad 160 N.W. 794 Minn. 1917
Lentz v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railroad 160 N.W. 794 Minn. 1917
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Strasser v. Stabeck, 112 Minn. 90 , ; O’Neil v. Potts, 130 Minn. 353 , .
Thompson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 158 N.W. 42 Minn. 1916
Thompson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 158 N.W. 42 Minn. 1916
Co. 124 Minn. 65 , ; Lewis v. Chicago G. W. R. Co. 124 Minn. 487 , ; Crandall v. Chicago G. W. R. Co. 127 Minn. 498 , ; Diebel v. Wolpert, Davis & Co. 129 Minn. 77 , ; Fitzgerald v. Armour & Co. 129 Minn. 81 , ; Kludzinski v. Great Northern Ry.