Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co., 145 N.W. 124.

37 citing documents.

Howe v. Nelson 135 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1965
Howe v. Nelson 135 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1965
6 Melady-Briggs Cattle Corp. v. Drovers State Bank, 213 Minn. 304 , 6 N. W. (2d) 454 ; Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 124 Minn. 416 , .
Smith v. Smith 51 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1952
Smith v. Smith 51 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1952
In Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 124 Minn. 416, 419 , , after recognizing the general rule that a judgment on the merits constitutes an absolute bar to a second suit for the same cause of action and is conclusive between the parties and privies not only as to every matter which was actually litigated, but also as to every matter which might have
Schimmelpfennig v. Gaedke 27 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1947
Schimmelpfennig v. Gaedke 27 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1947
Benedict v. Pfunder, 183 Minn. 396 , ; Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 124 Minn. 416 , .
Melady-Briggs Cattle Corp. v. Drovers State Bank 6 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 1942
Melady-Briggs Cattle Corp. v. Drovers State Bank 6 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 1942
Co. 61 Minn. 423 , ; Veline v. Dahlquist, 64 Minn. 119 , ; White v. Hewitt, 119 Minn. 340 , ; Harbek v. Carpenter-Robinson Co. 123 Minn. 389 , ; Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth F. L. Co. 124 Minn. 416 , ; Eder v. Fink, 147 Minn. 438 , ; Driscoll v. Board of Co. Commrs.
Whitney v. Clow 271 N.W. 589 Minn. 1937
Whitney v. Clow 271 N.W. 589 Minn. 1937
The issues are the same and the parties framing the issues are the same and are adverse parties in both actions.” *315 See White v. Hewitt, 119 Minn. 340 , ; Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Land Co. 124 Minn. 416 , ; Cronan v. Wolfe, 138 Minn. 308 , .
Krocak v. Krocak 249 N.W. 671 Minn. 1933
Krocak v. Krocak 249 N.W. 671 Minn. 1933
Kinzel v. Boston & D. F. L. Co. 124 Minn. 416 , ; Lufkin v. Harvey, 125 Minn. 458 , .
Steinberg v. Silverman 244 N.W. 105 Minn. 1932
Gustafson v. Gustafson 226 N.W. 412 Minn. 1929
Gustafson v. Gustafson 226 N.W. 412 Minn. 1929
demand and its effect as an estoppel in another action between the same parties upon a different claim or cause of action.” In the latter case the judgment in the first suit does operate as an estoppel, but only as to any “point or question actually litigated and determined.” 15 R. C. L. 962, 973; O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , , 79 A. S. R. 426; Kinzel v. B. & D. F. L. Co. 124 Minn. 416 , ; Maguire v. Maguire, 171 Minn. 492 , , ; Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , , 4 A. L. R. 1166.
Reichert v. Pure Oil Co. 214 N.W. 669 Minn. 1927
Reichert v. Pure Oil Co. 214 N.W. 669 Minn. 1927
O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , , 79 A. S. R. 426; Kinzel v. Boston & D. F. L. Co. 124 Minn. 416 , ; Maguire v. Maguire, 171 Minn. 492 , , .
Fox v. Fox 191 N.W. 420 Minn. 1923
Fox v. Fox 191 N.W. 420 Minn. 1923
Co. 61 Minn. 423 , ; Veline v. Dahlquist, 64 Minn. 119 , ; Kinzel v. Boston & D. F. L. Co., 124 Minn. 416 , ; Sheets v. Ramer, 125 Minn. 98 , ; Vineseck v. Great Northern Ry.
Schoonmaker v. St. Paul Title & Trust Co. 188 N.W. 223 Minn. 1922
Schoonmaker v. St. Paul Title & Trust Co. 188 N.W. 223 Minn. 1922
White v. Hewitt, 119 Minn. 840 , ; Kinzel v. Boston & D. F. L. Co. 124 Minn. 416 , .
Eder v. Fink 180 N.W. 542 Minn. 1920
Eder v. Fink 180 N.W. 542 Minn. 1920
§ 5163; White v. Hewitt, 119 Minn. 340 , ; Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth F. L. Co. 124 Minn. 416 , ; Telford v. McGillis, 130 Minn. 397 , , Ann. Cas.
Canellos v. Zotalis 177 N.W. 133 Minn. 1920
Canellos v. Zotalis 177 N.W. 133 Minn. 1920
Illustrations of a double statement of *295 facts constituting but one' cause of action may be found in Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , , and Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth F. L. Co. 124 Minn. 416 , .
Przyblyski v. Pellowski 169 N.W. 707 Minn. 1918
Przyblyski v. Pellowski 169 N.W. 707 Minn. 1918
Co. 119 Minn. 238 , ; and Kinzel v. Boston & D. Farm Land Co. 124 Minn. 416 , .
Kruta v. Lough 154 N.W. 514 Minn. 1915
Kruta v. Lough 154 N.W. 514 Minn. 1915
Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman, 121 Minn. 352 , ; Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 124 Minn. 416 , ; Lufkin v. Harvey, 125 Minn. 458 , ; Meyer v. Saterbak, 128 Minn. 304 , .
Meyer v. Saterbak 150 N.W. 901 Minn. 1915
Meyer v. Saterbak 150 N.W. 901 Minn. 1915
Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 124 Minn. 416 , ; Lufkin v. Harvey, 125 Minn. 458 , .
McKnight v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 149 N.W. 131 Minn. 1914
McKnight v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 149 N.W. 131 Minn. 1914
Co. 119 Minn. 238 , ; Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth F. L. Co. 124 Minn. 416 , .
Lufkin v. Harvey 147 N.W. 444 Minn. 1914
Lufkin v. Harvey 147 N.W. 444 Minn. 1914
Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 124 Minn. 416 , .
Bouck v. Shere 145 N.W. 808 Minn. 1914
Bouck v. Shere 145 N.W. 808 Minn. 1914
Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 124 Minn. 416 , .