Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co., 148 N.W. 561.

25 citing documents.

Eagan Economic Development Authority v. U-Haul Co. of Minnesota 765 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Eagan Economic Development Authority v. U-Haul Co. of Minnesota 765 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See Minn. Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co., 127 Minn. 23, 28 , 148 N.W.
Itasca County v. Carpenter 602 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Itasca County v. Carpenter 602 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In 1914, the supreme court explained that to find a public purpose in support of condemnation under the eminent domain statutes requires a finding that the purpose “can be attained.” Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co., 127 Minn. 23, 33 , 148 N.W.
Opus Northwest, L.L.C. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 599 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Opus Northwest, L.L.C. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 599 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co., 127 Minn. 23, 32 , 148 N.W.
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Opus Northwest, LLC 582 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Matter of MCDA 582 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Matter of MCDA 582 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co., 127 Minn. 23, 31-32 , 148 N.W.
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Opus Northwest, LLC 582 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co., 127 Minn. 23, 31-32 , 148 N.W.
Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp. v. City of St. Louis Park 121 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1963
Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp. v. City of St. Louis Park 121 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1963
Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co. 127 Minn. 23 , ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
Volden v. Selke 87 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1958
Volden v. Selke 87 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1958
5 Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co. 127 Minn. 23, 28 , ; see, Burnett v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irr.
Burnquist v. Cook 19 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 1945
Petraborg v. Zontelli 15 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1944
Petraborg v. Zontelli 15 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1944
The rights which thus belong to him as riparian owner of the abutting premises are valuable property rights of which he cannot be divested without consent, except by due process of law, and, if for public purposes, upon just compensation.” State v. Korrer, 127 Minn. 60, 72 , , L. R. A. 1916C, 139; Minnesota C. & P. Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co. 127 Minn. 23 , ; Hanford v. St.
In Re Establishment of Judicial Road 222 N.W. 578 Minn. 1928
In re Establishment of Judicial Road 176 Minn. 94 Minn. 1928
In re Establishment of Judicial Road 176 Minn. 94 Minn. 1928
425; Minnesota C. & P. Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co. 127 Minn. 23, 28 , ; State ex rel.
In Re Establishment of Judicial Road 222 N.W. 578 Minn. 1928
425 ; Minnesota C. P. Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co. 127 Minn. 23 , 28 , 148 N.W.
Price v. Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railway Co. 153 N.W. 532 Minn. 1915
Price v. Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railway Co. 153 N.W. 532 Minn. 1915
105; Minnesota, C. & P. Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co. 127 Minn. 23 , .
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Brastad 151 N.W. 198 Minn. 1915
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Brastad 151 N.W. 198 Minn. 1915
105; Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co. 127 Minn. 23 , ; Kaukauna Water Power Co. v. Green Bay & Miss.