Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. Starrett, 149 N.W. 6.

26 citing documents.

M & G Services, Inc. v. Buffalo Lake Advanced Biofuels, LLC 895 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
M & G Services, Inc. v. Buffalo Lake Advanced Biofuels, LLC 895 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
127 Minn. 138 , 149 N.W.
Anderson v. Breezy Point Estates 168 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1969
Anderson v. Breezy Point Estates 168 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1969
In that connection, in Johnson v. Starrett, 127 Minn. 138, 141 , , L. R. A. 1915B, 708, 710, the court stated in effect that, despite conflicting decisions of other tribunals, no narrow or limited construction of our mechanics lien law should be adopted by the courts; that labor and industry should not be hampered by technical or harsh interpretations of what
Albert and Harlow Inc. v. Great Northern Oil Co. 167 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1969
Albert and Harlow Inc. v. Great Northern Oil Co. 167 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1969
Johnson v. Starrett, 127 Minn. 138 , , L. R. A. 1915B, 708.
O. B. Thompson Electric Co. v. Milliman & Larson, Inc. 128 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 1964
O. B. Thompson Electric Co. v. Milliman & Larson, Inc. 128 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 1964
Quoting the language of the Emery case in Johnson v. Starrett, 127 Minn. 138, 141 , , L. R. A. 1915B, 708, we said: *303 “It is sufficient for us to say that, whatever may be the conflicting decisions of other tribunals, we are of the opinion that no narrow or limited construction of our mechanic’s lien law should be indulged in by the courts, and that the labor and industry of
Sandberg v. Burns 270 N.W. 575 Minn. 1936
Sandberg v. Burns 270 N.W. 575 Minn. 1936
Johnson v. Starrett, 127 Minn. 138 , , L. R. A. 1915B, 708.
General Motors Truck Co. v. Phillips 254 N.W. 580 Minn. 1934
General Motors Truck Co. v. Phillips 254 N.W. 580 Minn. 1934
We have next the case of Johnson v. Starrett, 127 Minn. 138 , , L. R. A. 1915B, 708.
Wienholz v. Hennessy 190 N.W. 785 Minn. 1922
Wienholz v. Hennessy 190 N.W. 785 Minn. 1922
Johnson v. Starrett, 127 Minn. 138 , , L. R. A. 1915B, 708.
Whitney v. Welnitz 190 N.W. 57 Minn. 1922
Whitney v. Welnitz 190 N.W. 57 Minn. 1922
And, although statutes couched in general terms creating rights and liabilities in respect to known and existing facts and conditions are often construed to apply to and embrace somewhat dissimilar yet analogous facts or conditions subsequently arising and coming into being (Johnson v. Starrett, 127 Minn. 138 , , L. R. A. 1915B, 708; State v. St.
Berglund & Peterson v. Abram 182 N.W. 624 Minn. 1921
Berglund & Peterson v. Abram 182 N.W. 624 Minn. 1921
Krengel v. Haslam, 118 Minn. 506 , ; Lindquist v. Young, 119 Minn. 219 , ; Atlas Lumber Co. v. Dupuis, 125 Minn. 45 , ; Johnson v. Starrett, 127 Minn. 138 , ; Lamoreaux v. Andersch, 128 Minn. 261 , .
Northland Pine Co. v. Northern Insulating Co. 177 N.W. 635 Minn. 1920
Northland Pine Co. v. Northern Insulating Co. 177 N.W. 635 Minn. 1920
§ 6048; Johnson v. Starrett, 127 Minn. 138 , , L.R.A.
Miller v. American Bonding Co. 158 N.W. 432 Minn. 1916
Miller v. American Bonding Co. 158 N.W. 432 Minn. 1916
Neither does Johnson v. Starrett, 127 Minn. 138 , , L.R.A.
Lamoreaux v. Andersch 150 N.W. 908 Minn. 1915
Lamoreaux v. Andersch 150 N.W. 908 Minn. 1915
Emery v. Hertig, 60 Minn. 54, 57 , ; Johnson v. Starrett, 127 Minn. 138 , .
Thompson-McDonald Lumber Co. v. Morawetz 149 N.W. 300 Minn. 1914
Thompson-McDonald Lumber Co. v. Morawetz 149 N.W. 300 Minn. 1914
Johnson v. Starrett, supra, p. 138, ; 2 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.