Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. City of Ely, 151 N.W. 545.

45 citing documents.

In Re the Redetermination of Benefits of Nicollet County Ditch 86A 488 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Redetermination of Benefits of Nicollet County Ditch 86A 488 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40, 47 , 151 N.W.
Anderson v. City of Bemidji 295 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1980
Anderson v. City of Bemidji 295 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1980
Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40, 47-50 , 151 N.W.
Joint Independent School District No. 287 v. City of Brooklyn Park 256 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1977
Joint Independent School District No. 287 v. City of Brooklyn Park 256 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1977
Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40, 47 , 151 N.W.
Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom 240 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1976
Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom 240 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1976
Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40, 47
Hartle v. City of Glencoe 226 N.W.2d 914 Minn. 1975
Hartle v. City of Glencoe 226 N.W.2d 914 Minn. 1975
Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40
American Oil Company v. City of St. Cloud 206 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1973
American Oil Company v. City of St. Cloud 206 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1973
Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40, 47 , as follows: “The legislature, and this charter takes the place of a legislative enactment, may apportion special assessments according to any method it deems proper, subject only to the requirement that such assessments be uniform upon the same class of property, that they be confined
Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton 183 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1971
Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton 183 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1971
Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40, 47 , , the constitution mandates that special assessments “be uniform upon the same class of property, that they be confined to property specially benefited by the improvement, and that they do not exceed such special benefits.” And, as we further stated in that case, if a special assessment exceed
Village of Edina v. Joseph 119 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1962
Village of Edina v. Joseph 119 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1962
Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , , Ann. Cas.
Qvale v. City of Willmar 25 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1946
Qvale v. City of Willmar 25 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1946
Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , , Ann. Cas.
Judd v. City of St. Cloud 272 N.W. 577 Minn. 1936
Judd v. City of St. Cloud 272 N.W. 577 Minn. 1936
Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , 151 N.W.
In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul 240 N.W. 355 Minn. 1932
In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul 240 N.W. 355 Minn. 1932
Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40, 47 , , Ann. Cas.
Board of Education v. Houghton 233 N.W. 834 Minn. 1930
Board of Education v. Houghton 233 N.W. 834 Minn. 1930
Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , , Ann Cas.
In Re Appeal of Meyer 223 N.W. 135 Minn. 1929
In Re Appeal of Meyer 223 N.W. 135 Minn. 1929
Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , 41 , 151 N.W.
In Re Assessment for Widening East Fourth Street in St. Paul 216 N.W. 907 Minn. 1927
In Re Assessment for Widening East Fourth Street in St. Paul 216 N.W. 907 Minn. 1927
Co. v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , , Ann. Cas.
In Re Assessment for Paving Mississippi River Boulevard 211 N.W. 9 Minn. 1926
In Re Assessment for Paving Mississippi River Boulevard 211 N.W. 9 Minn. 1926
v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , , Ann Cas.
State v. Peterson 198 N.W. 1011 Minn. 1924
State v. Peterson 198 N.W. 1011 Minn. 1924
State v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , , Ann. Cas.
State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. Erickson 195 N.W. 919 Minn. 1923
State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. Erickson 195 N.W. 919 Minn. 1923
Turner v. Snyder, 101 Minn. 481 , ; State v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , , Ann. Cas.
Arizona Copper Co. v. Garcia 214 P. 317 Ariz. 1923
Armour v. Village of Litchfield 188 N.W. 1006 Minn. 1922
Armour v. Village of Litchfield 188 N.W. 1006 Minn. 1922
But it is not to be overlooked that charging private property with a lien for public improvements is a taking for public use, and that, if property not benefited is assessed, or if an assessment is greatly in excess of benefits, the taking is without just compensation and is unconstitutional.” State v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , , Ann. Cas.
In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles Park 188 N.W. 59 Minn. 1922
In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles Park 188 N.W. 59 Minn. 1922
494, or in excess of actual benefits, State v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , , Ann. Cas.
In re the Assessment of Benefits, Costs & Expenses 181 N.W. 859 Minn. 1921
In re the Assessment of Benefits, Costs & Expenses 181 N.W. 859 Minn. 1921
It was in recognition1 of this principle .of fundamental law that we said in State v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , , Ann. Cas.
City of St. Paul v. Oakland Cemetery Ass'n 159 N.W. 962 Minn. 1916
City of St. Paul v. Oakland Cemetery Ass'n 159 N.W. 962 Minn. 1916
See also State v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , , Ann. Cas.
Park v. City of Duluth 159 N.W. 627 Minn. 1916
Park v. City of Duluth 159 N.W. 627 Minn. 1916
State v. City of Ely, 129 Minn. 40 , , Ann. Cas.