Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 152 N.W. 645.

46 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne Riggs 865 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne Riggs 865 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 2015
Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271, 274 , 152 N.W.
Schumann v. McGinn 240 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 1976
Schumann v. McGinn 240 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 1976
See, Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , Schulze v. Kleeber, 10 Wis.
Watts Ex Rel. Watts v. Erickson 69 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1955
Watts Ex Rel. Watts v. Erickson 69 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1955
Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812; Clark v. Davis, 153 Minn. 143 , .
Beebe v. Kleidon 65 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1954
Beebe v. Kleidon 65 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1954
Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812; 22 Minn. L. Rev. 391 , 399 to 400.
State v. Quinnild 42 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1950
State v. Quinnild 42 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1950
806; Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812; Meyer v. Travelers Ins.
State v. Gorman 40 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1949
State v. Gorman 40 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1949
Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , ; Roach v. G. N. Ry.
Ammundson v. Falk 36 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1949
Ammundson v. Falk 36 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1949
Co. 133 Minn. 257 , ; Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , *121 ; 2 Dunnell, Dig.
Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 27 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1947
Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 27 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1947
Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812; Mueller v. Dewey, 159 Minn. 173 , ; Hinkle v. M. A. & C. R. Ry.
Hanson v. Hall 279 N.W. 227 Minn. 1938
Hanson v. Hall 279 N.W. 227 Minn. 1938
Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812; Mueller v. Dewey, 159 Minn. 173 , ; Hinkle v. M. A. & C. R. Ry.
Wenell v. Shapiro 260 N.W. 503 Minn. 1935
Wenell v. Shapiro 260 N.W. 503 Minn. 1935
Co. 77 Minn. 503 , ; Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812; Deater v. Penn Machine Co. 311 Pa.
Fischer v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 258 N.W. 4 Minn. 1934
Fischer v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 258 N.W. 4 Minn. 1934
In Lambrecht v. Schreyer, supra [ 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812], it was said that the testimony might come from the person who made the declaration, but this was said with reference to testimony given by a witness for the plaintiff and not by the plaintiff himself.
O'Connor v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 251 N.W. 674 Minn. 1933
O'Connor v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 251 N.W. 674 Minn. 1933
R. 288; Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. *282 271, , L. R. A. 1915E, 812; Roach v. G. N. Ry.
Dougherty v. Garrick 239 N.W. 153 Minn. 1931
Dougherty v. Garrick 239 N.W. 153 Minn. 1931
Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812; Roach v. G. N. Ry.
Johnston v. W. S. Nott Co. 236 N.W. 466 Minn. 1931
Johnston v. W. S. Nott Co. 236 N.W. 466 Minn. 1931
Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812; Hyvonen v. Hector Iron Co. 103 Minn. 331 , , 123 A. S. R. 332; Roach v. G. N. Ry.
State v. Jue Ming 230 N.W. 639 Minn. 1930
State v. Jue Ming 230 N.W. 639 Minn. 1930
806; State v. Ingraham, 118 Minn. 13 , ; Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812; Roach v. G. N. Ry.
State v. Humphrey 217 N.W. 373 Minn. 1928
State v. Humphrey 217 N.W. 373 Minn. 1928
Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812; Meyer v.Travelers Ins.
Linderoth v. Kieffer 203 N.W. 415 Minn. 1925
Linderoth v. Kieffer 203 N.W. 415 Minn. 1925
“In determining whether the statement made is part of the res gestae * '* * the trial court has a wide range of discretion,” Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812, “but its discretion is not absolute,” Roach v. G. N. Ry.
Schendel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 197 N.W. 744 Minn. 1924
Schendel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 197 N.W. 744 Minn. 1924
It was not the spontaneous outcry of a spectator of the accident as it was taking place, like Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , .
Ahlberg v. Griggs 196 N.W. 652 Minn. 1924
Ahlberg v. Griggs 196 N.W. 652 Minn. 1924
It came within the doctrine of such cases as Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R, A. 1915E, 812; Roach v. Great North.
Clark v. Davis 190 N.W. 45 Minn. 1922
Clark v. Davis 190 N.W. 45 Minn. 1922
806; Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812; Meyer v. Travelers Ins.
Perkins v. Great Northern Railway Co. 188 N.W. 564 Minn. 1922
Perkins v. Great Northern Railway Co. 188 N.W. 564 Minn. 1922
806; Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812; Meyer v. Travelers Ins.
State v. Rothi 188 N.W. 50 Minn. 1922
State v. Rothi 188 N.W. 50 Minn. 1922
What is part of the res gestae in cases of this sort must be controlled by the same considerations that govern in other cases, and these are pointed out quite fully in Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 812, and Roach v. Great Northern Ry.
Roach v. Great Northern Railway Co. 158 N.W. 232 Minn. 1916
Roach v. Great Northern Railway Co. 158 N.W. 232 Minn. 1916
Co. 130 Minn. 242 , , and in Lambrecht v. Schreyer, 129 Minn. 271 , , L.R.A.