Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District Court, 150 N.W. 211.

42 citing documents.

Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Virginia R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , 150 N.W.
Pederson v. Pederson 39 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1949
Virginia & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Angell v. White Eagle O. & R. Co. 169 Minn. 183 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; K
Korthuis v. Soderling & Sons 16 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1944
Korthuis v. Soderling & Sons 16 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1944
Virginia & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , ; Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co. 169 Minn. 329 , .
Anfinson v. A. O. U. W. Insurance Co. 3 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1942
Anfinson v. A. O. U. W. Insurance Co. 3 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1942
Virginia & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522, 525 , .
Kellerman v. City of St. Paul 1 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1941
Kellerman v. City of St. Paul 1 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1941
Virginia & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , .
Hagelstad v. Usiak 252 N.W. 430 Minn. 1934
Hagelstad v. Usiak 252 N.W. 430 Minn. 1934
Virginia R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , 150 N.W.
Carter v. W. J. Dyer & Bro. 243 N.W. 436 Minn. 1932
Carter v. W. J. Dyer & Bro. 243 N.W. 436 Minn. 1932
V. & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , , it is held that the test of Avhether a person is an employe is the right of control, and that, unless it appears conclusively that the right to control and supervise the Avork Avas not reserved, the question of whether the relation of employer and employe exists is a question of fact.
Barker v. Bemidji Wood Products Co. 238 N.W. 692 Minn. 1931
Barker v. Bemidji Wood Products Co. 238 N.W. 692 Minn. 1931
V. & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , (injured person getting out timber on piece basis; inspector and foreman inspected once a week; controlled his own time; finding that he was employe held sustained by the evidence) ; Schoewe v. Winona P. & G. Co. 155 Minn. 4 , (blacksmith, at request of defendant, went to its warehou
Lampi v. Koponen 226 N.W. 475 Minn. 1929
Lampi v. Koponen 226 N.W. 475 Minn. 1929
Virginia & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , , is quite in point.
Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co. 223 N.W. 608 Minn. 1929
Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co. 223 N.W. 608 Minn. 1929
V. & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , ; Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co. 169 Minn. 329 , .
Rouse v. Town of Bird Island 211 N.W. 327 Minn. 1926
Rouse v. Town of Bird Island 211 N.W. 327 Minn. 1926
Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , ; Dunn v. Reeves C. Y. Co. 150 Minn. 282 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. supra; *369 Lynch v. Hutchinson Prod.
Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co. 211 N.W. 313 Minn. 1926
Lynch v. Hutchinson Produce Co. 211 N.W. 313 Minn. 1926
V. & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43, 47 , , “this right afforded adequate means for controlling his work.” Apparently relator was also at liberty to stop work whenever drilling became too difficult a task.
Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. 210 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1926
Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. 210 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1926
State v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros, supra.
Schullo v. Village of Nashwauk 207 N.W. 621 Minn. 1926
Schullo v. Village of Nashwauk 207 N.W. 621 Minn. 1926
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; State v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , .
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 198 N.W. 134 Minn. 1924
Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 198 N.W. 134 Minn. 1924
V. & R. L. Co. v. District Court, 128 Minn. 43 , .
Wallace v. Pine Tree Lumber Co. 185 N.W. 500 Minn. 1921
Wallace v. Pine Tree Lumber Co. 185 N.W. 500 Minn. 1921
Louis County, 128 Minn. 43 , , was a compensation case, where the workman instead of wages was paid by the piece.
Dunn v. Reeves Coal Yards Co. 184 N.W. 1027 Minn. 1921
Dunn v. Reeves Coal Yards Co. 184 N.W. 1027 Minn. 1921
Louis County, 128 Minn. 43 , ; Winters v. American Radiator Co. 128 Minn. 508 , , L.R.A.
State ex rel. Lundgren v. District Court 169 N.W. 488 Minn. 1918
State ex rel. Lundgren v. District Court 169 N.W. 488 Minn. 1918
Louis County, 128 Minn. 43 , ; State v. District Court of Rice County, 131 Minn. 352 , , Ann. Cas.
State ex rel. Casualty Co. v. District Court 158 N.W. 700 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Casualty Co. v. District Court 158 N.W. 700 Minn. 1916
Louis County, 128 Minn. 43 , ; State v. District Court of St.
State ex rel. City of Northfield v. District Court of Rice County 155 N.W. 103 Minn. 1915
State ex rel. City of Northfield v. District Court of Rice County 155 N.W. 103 Minn. 1915
Louis County, 128 Minn. 43 , .
Aarnes v. Great Northern Railway Co. 152 N.W. 866 Minn. 1915
Aarnes v. Great Northern Railway Co. 152 N.W. 866 Minn. 1915
Louis County, 128 Minn. 43 , , the rule is laid down that “the test for determining whether one person is the employee of another, within the rule making the employer responsible for injuries resulting from the negligence of his employee, is whether such person possessed the power to control the other in respect to the transaction

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by