Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District Court, 151 N.W. 912.
- Snyder v. General Paper Corporation 152 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1967
-
Snyder v. General Paper Corporation
152 N.W.2d 743
Minn. 1967
Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176, 179 , , Mr. Justice Holt, speaking for this court, said: “We shall not attempt to formulate a definition of the phrase, accidental injury arising out of the employment, except to say that the accident causing the injury must arise out of work or business being done for the master either by direct o
- Yeager v. Chapman 45 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1951
-
Yeager v. Chapman
45 N.W.2d 776
Minn. 1951
Duluth B. & M. Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176 , ; Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , .
- Fjeld v. Marshall County Co-Operative Oil Assn. 35 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1948
-
Fjeld v. Marshall County Co-Operative Oil Assn.
35 N.W.2d 448
Minn. 1948
[Duluth B. & M. Co.] v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176 , .
- Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. A. M. 32 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1948
-
Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. A. M.
32 N.W.2d 255
Minn. 1948
Duluth B. & M. Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176 , ; Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , .
- Salisbury v. State Department of Social Security 20 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1945
-
Salisbury v. State Department of Social Security
20 N.W.2d 349
Minn. 1945
& Malting Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176, 180 , , this court made a statement which may appropriately be quoted here: ““ * when a servant undertakes in the course of his employment, during the proper hours therefor, and in the proper place to do something in furtherance of his master’s business, and meets with accidental injury therein, th
- Brusven v. Ballord 14 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1944
-
Brusven v. Ballord
14 N.W.2d 861
Minn. 1944
& Malting Co.] v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176 , .
- Schneider v. Salvation Army 14 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 1944
-
Schneider v. Salvation Army
14 N.W.2d 467
Minn. 1944
& M. Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176, 178 , , 913: “* " * The statute is highly remedial in character.
- Kiley v. Sward-Kemp Drug Co. 9 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1943
- James v. Peterson 1 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1942
-
James v. Peterson
1 N.W.2d 844
Minn. 1942
Duluth B. & M. Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176 , ; State ex rel.
- Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council No. 32 297 N.W. 4 Minn. 1941
-
Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council No. 32
297 N.W. 4
Minn. 1941
v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176 , .
- Colosimo v. Giacomo 273 N.W. 632 Minn. 1937
-
Colosimo v. Giacomo
273 N.W. 632
Minn. 1937
& Malting Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176, 178 , , 913: “The courts ought therefore to guard against a narrow construction, and should not exclude a servant from the benefits thereof, unless constrained by unambiguous language or the clear intent as gathered from the entire act.” We have held that the repair of a business building was part of th
- Anderson v. Ueland 267 N.W. 517 Minn. 1936
-
Anderson v. Ueland
267 N.W. 517
Minn. 1936
Duluth B. M. Co. v. District Court, 129 "Minn. 176, , nevertheless we are of the opinion that the adoption of the arbitrary distinction contended for would not be a proper construction of the statute in question and would be contrary to the spirit and intent of the workmen's compensation act.
- Gibbs v. Almstrom 145 Minn. 35 Minn. 1930
-
Gibbs v. Almstrom
145 Minn. 35
Minn. 1930
Louis County, 129 Minn. 176 , .
- Baaken v. Naufft & Bergstrom 228 N.W. 931 Minn. 1930
-
Baaken v. Naufft & Bergstrom
228 N.W. 931
Minn. 1930
Duluth B. & M. Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176 , ; Orcutt v. Trustees of Wesley M. E. Church, 170 Minn. 97 , ; Ramczik v. Winona M. & F. Co. 174 Minn. 156 , .
- Ramczik v. Winona MacHine & Foundry Co. 218 N.W. 545 Minn. 1928
-
Ramczik v. Winona MacHine & Foundry Co.
218 N.W. 545
Minn. 1928
& M. Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176 , ; Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co. 144 Minn. 105 , ; Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , ; Olson v. Robinson, Straus & Co. 168 Minn. 114 , ; Orcutt v. Trustees of Wesley M. E. Church, 170 Minn. 97 , ; Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co. 1
- Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co. 213 N.W. 546 Minn. 1927
-
Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co.
213 N.W. 546
Minn. 1927
Duluth B. & M. Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176 , .
- Orcutt v. Trustees of Wesley Methodist Episcopal Church 212 N.W. 173 Minn. 1927
-
Orcutt v. Trustees of Wesley Methodist Episcopal Church
212 N.W. 173
Minn. 1927
M. Co. v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176 , 151 N.W.
- Olson v. Robinson, Straus & Co. 210 N.W. 64 Minn. 1926
-
Olson v. Robinson, Straus & Co.
210 N.W. 64
Minn. 1926
v. Dis *116 trict Court, 129 Minn. 176 , ; State ex rel.
- Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 198 N.W. 290 Minn. 1924
-
Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
198 N.W. 290
Minn. 1924
v. District Court, 129 Minn. 176 , .
- Harris v. Kaul 183 N.W. 828 Minn. 1921
-
Harris v. Kaul
183 N.W. 828
Minn. 1921
Louis County, 129 Minn. 176 , ; State ex rel.
- Nesbitt v. Twin City Forge & Foundry Co. 177 N.W. 131 Minn. 1920
-
Nesbitt v. Twin City Forge & Foundry Co.
177 N.W. 131
Minn. 1920
Louis County, 129 Minn. 176 , ; Otto v. Duluth Street Ry.
- State ex rel. Great Northern Express Co. v. District Court of Ramsey County 172 N.W. 310 Minn. 1919
-
State ex rel. Great Northern Express Co. v. District Court of Ramsey County
172 N.W. 310
Minn. 1919
Louis County, 129 Minn. 176 , ; State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 129 Minn. 502 , , L.R.A.
- State ex rel. Niessen v. District Court of Ramsey County 172 N.W. 133 Minn. 1919
-
State ex rel. Niessen v. District Court of Ramsey County
172 N.W. 133
Minn. 1919
Louis County, 129 Minn. 176 , .
- State ex rel. Lundgren v. District Court 169 N.W. 488 Minn. 1918
-
State ex rel. Lundgren v. District Court
169 N.W. 488
Minn. 1918
Louis County, 129 Minn. 176 , ; State v. District Court of St.
- State ex rel. Miller v. District Court 164 N.W. 1012 Minn. 1917
-
State ex rel. Miller v. District Court
164 N.W. 1012
Minn. 1917
Louis County, 129 Minn. 176 , Mahowald v. Thompson-Starrett Co. 134 Minn. 113, *328 117 , , ; State v. District Court, 138 Minn. 131 , .
- State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District Court 164 N.W. 585 Minn. 1917