DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Provo v. Conrad, 153 N.W. 753.

30 citing documents.

  • Wineman v. Carter 4 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1942
  • Wineman v. Carter 4 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1942
    598; Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , .
  • Barry v. Sill 253 N.W. 14 Minn. 1934
  • Barry v. Sill 253 N.W. 14 Minn. 1934
    Co. 125 Minn. 74 , , L. R. A. 1918D, 355; Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , ; Robinson v. Pence Automobile Co. 140 Minn. 332 , ; Moore v. P. J. Downes Co. 150 Minn. 333 , ; Piepho v. M. Sigbert-Awes Co. 152 Minn. 315 , ; Elliason v. Western C. & C. Co. 162 Minn. 213 , ; Loucks v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 188 Minn. 18
  • Loucks v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 246 N.W. 893 Minn. 1933
  • Loucks v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 246 N.W. 893 Minn. 1933
    Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , ; Robinson v. Pence Automobile Co. 140 Minn. 332 , ; Mogle v. A. W. Scott Co. 144 Minn. 173 , ; Menton v. L. Patterson Merc.
  • Lausche v. Denison-Harding Chevrolet Co. 243 N.W. 52 Minn. 1932
  • Lausche v. Denison-Harding Chevrolet Co. 243 N.W. 52 Minn. 1932
    That view has not been adopted here (Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , 153 N.W.
  • Lund v. Olson 237 N.W. 188 Minn. 1931
  • Lund v. Olson 237 N.W. 188 Minn. 1931
    That being so, the following cases justify the order of the learned trial court directing a verdict for Olson: Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , ; Moore v. P. J. Downes Co. 150 Minn. 333 , ; Adams v. Nathanson, 161 Minn. 433 , ; Malmquist v. Hellenic Community, 163 Minn. 10 , ; Stauffer v. Schilpin, 167 Minn. 301 , ; Holmgren v. Red Lake Falls Mill.
  • Free Press Co. v. Bellig 236 N.W. 306 Minn. 1931
  • Free Press Co. v. Bellig 236 N.W. 306 Minn. 1931
    ' The plaintiff makes the claim that the driver of its truck had departed from its employ in going to dinner and was without the scope of his employment, citing Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , .
  • Messenbring, Sr. v. Blackwood 213 N.W. 541 Minn. 1927
  • Messenbring, Sr. v. Blackwood 213 N.W. 541 Minn. 1927
    433 , ; Fostrom v. Grossman, 161 Minn. 440 , ; Stoneman v. Washburn-Croshy Co. 153 Minn. 331 , ; Piepho v. M. Sigbert-Awes Co. 152 Minn. 315 , ; Behrens v. Hawkeye Oil Co. 151 Minn. 478 , ; Moore v. P. J. Downes Co. 150 Minn. 333 , ; Robinson v. Pence Automobile Co. 140 Minn. 332 , ; Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , ; Ploetz v. Holt, 124 Minn. 169 , ; Slater v. Advance Thresher Co. 97 Minn. 305 , , 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 598.
  • Holmgren v. Red Lake Falls Milling Co. 210 N.W. 1000 Minn. 1926
  • Holmgren v. Red Lake Falls Milling Co. 210 N.W. 1000 Minn. 1926
    513 , and automobiles, Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , .
  • Stauffer v. Schilpin 208 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1926
  • Stauffer v. Schilpin 208 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1926
    Malmquist v. Hellenic Community, 163 Minn. 10 , ; Adams v. Nathanson, 161 Minn. 433 , ; Moore v. P. J. Downes Co. 150 *304 Minn. 333, ; Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , ; Slater v. Advance T. Co. 97 Minn. 305 , , 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 598; Goodrich v. Musgrave F. & A. Co. 154 Iowa, 637 , .
  • Adams v. Nathanson 201 N.W. 927 Minn. 1925
  • Fostrom v. Grossman 201 N.W. 926 Minn. 1925
  • Adams v. Nathanson 201 N.W. 927 Minn. 1925
    Of course there is no liability where an employe uses his employer’s automobile to go on a frolic of his own, Slater v. Advance Thresher Co. 97 Minn. 305 , , 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 598, or for a purpose having no relation to his employer’s business, Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , ; Moore v. P. J. Downs Co. 150 Minn. 333 , , but the jury may find the employer liable although the employe exceeded his actual authority or even disobeyed his express instructions.
  • Fostrom v. Grossman 201 N.W. 926 Minn. 1925
    *443 Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , ; Stoneman v. Washburn-Crosby Co. 153 Minn. 331 , ; and Robertson v. Spitler, 153 Minn. 395 , , are recent cases in which this court had the applicability of the rule under consideration.
  • Moore v. P. J. Downes Co. 185 N.W. 395 Minn. 1921
  • Moore v. P. J. Downes Co. 185 N.W. 395 Minn. 1921
    Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , ; Slater v. Advance Thresher Co. 97 Minn. 305 , , 5 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Fransen v. Kellogg Toasted Corn Flake Co. 184 N.W. 364 Minn. 1921
  • Fransen v. Kellogg Toasted Corn Flake Co. 184 N.W. 364 Minn. 1921
    Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , , and cases cited.
  • Mogle v. A. W. Scott Co. 174 N.W. 832 Minn. 1919
  • Mogle v. A. W. Scott Co. 174 N.W. 832 Minn. 1919
    Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , .
  • Johnson v. Evans 170 N.W. 220 Minn. 1919
  • Johnson v. Evans 170 N.W. 220 Minn. 1919
    598, and Provo v. Conrad, 130 Minn. 412 , , are not in point.