DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Basting v. Probate Court, 155 N.W. 1077.

15 citing documents.

  • Christy v. Saliterman 179 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1970
    The term “locality” has been accorded a broad connotation since the case of Viita v. Fleming, 132 Minn. 128 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 644, which, as early as 1916, recognized that because of expanding means of communication and inter-professional information the geographical location of a physician’s practice is no longer an essential element in determining the standard of care by which a defendant is to be judged.
  • Hoffman v. Naslund 144 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
    See, Viita v. Fleming, 132 Minn. 128 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 644; Louisell & Williams, Trial of Medical Malpractice Cases, § 8.04.
  • Miller v. Raaen 139 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1966
    See, Viita v. Fleming, 132 Minn. 128 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 644; Quickstad v. Tavenner, 196 Minn. 125 , .
  • McGough v. McCarthy Improvement Co. 287 N.W. 857 Minn. 1939
    The case of Viita v. Fleming, 132 Minn. 128 , , L.R.A.
  • Ahlsted v. Hart 275 N.W. 404 Minn. 1937
    Brewer v. Casey, 196 Mass. 384, 389 , 82 N. E. 45, 46 , the court stated: “In the application of this principle, if in good faith a'Claim is made against one of the alleged wrongdoers, who is thereafter discharged by a compromise, all are thereby released, even if the party with whom the settlement is made might not have been legally liable.” Plaintiff relies on Viita v. Fleming, 132 Minn. 128 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 644, Ann. Cas.
  • Smith v. Mann 239 N.W. 223 Minn. 1931
    We are cited also to Almquist v. Wilcox, 115 Minn. 37 , , and Viita v. Fleming, 132 Minn. 128 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 644, Ann. Cas.
  • Pederson v. Eppard 231 N.W. 393 Minn. 1930
    The plaintiff relies upon Viita v. Fleming, 132 Minn. 128 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 644, Ann. Cas.
  • Storhaugen v. Motor Truck Service Co. 213 N.W. 372 Minn. 1927
    at bar when the fact was disclosed that defendant was insured by the company named, the learned trial court did not permit .any further questioning emphasizing the fact of insurance,, and there is nothing in the record tending to show that the subject of insurance was ever mentioned during the trial, so that there is nothing meriting the disapproval meted out in Viita v. Fleming, 132 Minn. 128 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 644, Ann. Cas.
  • In Re Estate of Rice 204 N.W. 543 Minn. 1925
  • In Re Estate of Rice 204 N.W. 543 Minn. 1925
    These cases arose prior to L. 1911, p. 274, c. 209, making the tax take effect upon death, as was noted in State v. Probate Court, 132 Minn. 104 , .
  • Berkholz v. Benepe 190 N.W. 800 Minn. 1922
    Getcliell v. Hill, 21 Minn. 464 ; Martin v. Courtney, 75 Minn. 255 , ; Staloch v. Holm, 100 Minn. 276 , Ill N. W. 264, 9 L. R. A. (N. S.) 712; McGray v. Cobb, 130 Minn. 434 , , ; Viita v. Fleming, 132 Minn. 128 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 644, Ann. Cas.
  • Clark v. George 180 N.W. 1011 Minn. 1921
    712; McGray v. Cobb, 130 Minn. 434 , , ; Viita v. Fleming, 132 Minn. 128 , , L.R.A.
  • Harju v. Allen 177 N.W. 1015 Minn. 1920
    Sawyer v. Berthold, 116 Minn. 441 , ; McGray v. Cobb, 130 Minn. 434 , , ; Viita v. Fleming, 132 Minn. 128, 132 , , L.R.A.
  • Mulliner v. Evangelischer Diakonniessenverein 175 N.W. 699 Minn. 1920
    987 ; Peck v. Hutchinson, 88 Iowa, 320 , ; Viita v. Fleming, 132 Minn. 128, 133 , , L.R.A.
  • Northwestern Fuel Co. v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 159 N.W. 832 Minn. 1916
    Viita v. Fleming, 133 Minn. 128 , .