Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thill v. Freiermuth, 156 N.W. 260.

28 citing documents.

MacKlett v. Temple 1 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 1941
MacKlett v. Temple 1 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 1941
Jur., Duress and Undue Influence, § 33; Howard v. Farr, 115 Minn. 86, 92 , ; Thill v. Freiermuth, 132 Minn. 242 , .
Berg v. Berg 275 N.W. 836 Minn. 1937
Berg v. Berg 275 N.W. 836 Minn. 1937
It must be shown that the donee occupied a position to dominate the donor, or exert an influence over him, by virtue of being intrusted with the donor’s business affairs.” So in Thill v. Freiermuth, 132 Minn. 242, 245 , , it is said: “It is not enough that the one benefited had an opportunity to exert undue influence and the motive for exercising it.
In Re Estate of Mollan 232 N.W. 1 Minn. 1930
In Re Estate of Mollan 232 N.W. 1 Minn. 1930
Thill v. Freiermuth, 132 Minn. 242 , 156 N. W. *221 260; Malley v. Quinn, 132 Minn. 254 , ; Dale v. First Nat.
Nelson v. Fallesen 180 Minn. 70 Minn. 1930
In Re Estate of Miller 230 N.W. 275 Minn. 1930
In Re Estate of Miller 230 N.W. 275 Minn. 1930
Thill v. Freiermuth, 132 Minn. 242 , 156 N.W.
Nelson v. Fallesen 180 Minn. 70 Minn. 1930
Thill v. Freiermuth, 132 Minn. 242 , ; 6 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Dale v. First National Bank of Rushmore 227 N.W. 501 Minn. 1929
Dale v. First National Bank of Rushmore 227 N.W. 501 Minn. 1929
Thill v. Freiermuth, 132 Minn. 242 , ; Malley v. Quinn, 132 Minn. 254 , .
In Re Estate of Jenks 205 N.W. 271 Minn. 1925
In Re Estate of Jenks 205 N.W. 271 Minn. 1925
665; Thill v. Freiermuth, 132 Minn. 242 , .
State Bank of Gibbon v. Fassbender 204 N.W. 953 Minn. 1925
State Bank of Gibbon v. Fassbender 204 N.W. 953 Minn. 1925
Howard v. Farr, 115 Minn. 86 , ; Rader v. Rader, 108 Minn. 139 , ; McEleney v. Donovan, 119 Minn. 294 , ; Thill v. Freiermuth, 132 Minn. 242 ; Boynton v. Simmons, 156 Minn. 144 , .
Brandes v. Hastings 203 N.W. 430 Minn. 1925
Brandes v. Hastings 203 N.W. 430 Minn. 1925
Thill v. Freiermuth, 132 Minn. 242 , 156 N. W. *17 280, and the authorities therein cited, clearly shows that the evidence here does not come anywhere near proving that any undue influence, in a legal sense, induced the making of this deed.
In re the Estate of Jernberg 190 N.W. 990 Minn. 1922
In re the Estate of Jernberg 190 N.W. 990 Minn. 1922
Thill v. Freiermuth, 132 Minn. 242 , .
Wood v. Connell 184 N.W. 955 Minn. 1921
Wood v. Connell 184 N.W. 955 Minn. 1921
665; *221 Thill v. Freiermuth, 132 Minn. 242 , ; Buck v. Buck, 126 Minn. 275 , .
Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Schudel 169 N.W. 795 Minn. 1918
Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Schudel 169 N.W. 795 Minn. 1918
Thill v. Freiermuth 165 N.W. 490 Minn. 1917
Thill v. Freiermuth 165 N.W. 490 Minn. 1917
Malley v. Quinn 156 N.W. 263 Minn. 1916
Malley v. Quinn 156 N.W. 263 Minn. 1916
See TM11 v. Freiermuth, supra, p. 242, .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by