Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mathwig v. Strand, 157 N.W. 589.

40 citing documents.

Kosbau v. Dress 400 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kosbau v. Dress 400 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See, Tarpy v. Nowicki, 286 Minn. 257, 262 , (quoting Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346, 348 , 157 N.W.
Conley v. Downing 321 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1982
Conley v. Downing 321 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1982
See Tarpy v. Nowicki, 286 Minn. 257, 262 , Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346, 348 , 157 N.W.
Flynn v. Sawyer 272 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1978
Flynn v. Sawyer 272 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1978
See, Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346, 348 , 157 N.W.
M. L. Gordon Sash & Door Co. v. Mormann 271 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1978
M. L. Gordon Sash & Door Co. v. Mormann 271 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1978
See Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , 157 N.W.
Tarpy v. Nowicki 175 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1970
Tarpy v. Nowicki 175 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1970
Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , ; The Melco Investment Co. v. Gapp, supra; Ballard v. Friedman, 151 Minn. 493 , ; 20 Dunnell, Dig.
Ahlstrand v. McPherson 173 N.W.2d 330 Minn. 1969
Ahlstrand v. McPherson 173 N.W.2d 330 Minn. 1969
The controlling authority on the issue before us is Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , , where the trial court found that a contract for conveyance of land was mutually abandoned and denied specific performance to the ven-dee.
Melco Investment Co. v. Gapp 105 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1960
Melco Investment Co. v. Gapp 105 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1960
8 Graceville State Bank v. Hofschild, 166 Minn. 58 , ; Enkema v. McIntyre, 136 Minn. 293 , , 2 A. L. R. 411; Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , .
Erickson v. Sinykin 26 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1947
Erickson v. Sinykin 26 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1947
Our holding was ( 129 Minn. 134 , ) : “* * * The case presented is one showing an abandonment in fact; that is, the tracks and bridges were removed, and there has been for 10 years a total failure to use the right of way for any purpose.” So, also, in Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , , we sustained the trial court’s finding that a contract for the conveyance of land had been abandoned by mutual consent of the parties *241 thereto.
Miller v. O. B. McClintock Co. 297 N.W. 724 Minn. 1941
Miller v. O. B. McClintock Co. 297 N.W. 724 Minn. 1941
Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , ; 6 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Gostomezik v. Gostomezik 253 N.W. 36 Minn. 1934
Gostomezik v. Gostomezik 253 N.W. 36 Minn. 1934
'Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , 157 N.W.
Stadelmann v. Boothroyd 212 N.W. 908 Minn. 1927
Stadelmann v. Boothroyd 212 N.W. 908 Minn. 1927
Graceville State Bank v. Hofschild, 166 Minn. 58 , ; Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , .
Vought v. Porter 209 N.W. 642 Minn. 1926
Vought v. Porter 209 N.W. 642 Minn. 1926
Smith v. Glover, 50 Minn. 58 , ; Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , ; Bringgold v. Stucky, 162 Minn. 343 , 202 * Graceville State Bank v. Hofschild, 166 Minn. 58 , .
Graceville State Bank v. Hofschild 206 N.W. 948 Minn. 1926
Graceville State Bank v. Hofschild 206 N.W. 948 Minn. 1926
Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , .
Bringgold v. Stucky 202 N.W. 739 Minn. 1925
Bringgold v. Stucky 202 N.W. 739 Minn. 1925
Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , ; Mineral Land Inv.
State Bank of Milan v. Sylte 202 N.W. 70 Minn. 1925
State Bank of Milan v. Sylte 202 N.W. 70 Minn. 1925
Co. 89 Minn. 187 , ; Finnes v. Selover, Bates & Co. 102 Minn. 334 , ; Chapman v. Propp, 125 Minn. 447 , ; Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , ; Needles v. Keyes, 149 Minn. 477 , ; Ballard v. Friedman, 151 Minn. 493 , .
Clark v. Dye 197 N.W. 209 Minn. 1924
Clark v. Dye 197 N.W. 209 Minn. 1924
Needles v. Keys, 149 Minn. 477 , ; Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , .
Ballard v. Friedman 187 N.W. 518 Minn. 1922
Ballard v. Friedman 187 N.W. 518 Minn. 1922
Needles v. Keys, 149 Minn. 477 , ; Chapman v. Propp, *496 125 Minn. 447 , ; Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , .
Porten v. Peterson 166 N.W. 183 Minn. 1918
Porten v. Peterson 166 N.W. 183 Minn. 1918
Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , , and cases cited.
Enkema v. McIntyre 161 N.W. 587 Minn. 1917
Enkema v. McIntyre 161 N.W. 587 Minn. 1917
Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346, 347 , 157 N W. 589.
Mineral Land Investment Co. v. Bishop Iron Co. 159 N.W. 966 Minn. 1916
Mineral Land Investment Co. v. Bishop Iron Co. 159 N.W. 966 Minn. 1916
Mathwig v. Ostrand, 132 Minn. 346 , ; Smith v. Glover, 50 Minn. 58 , ; Holingren v. Piete, 50 Minn. 27 , .