Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Leonard v. Schall, 157 N.W. 723.

28 citing documents.

Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co. 128 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 1964
Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co. 128 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 1964
1 Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , , 4 A. L. R. 1166; Wolfson v. Northern States Management Co. 221 Minn. 474 , 22 N. W. (2d) 545 .
Wolfson v. Northern States Management Co. 22 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1946
Wolfson v. Northern States Management Co. 22 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1946
Leonard v. Schall, *480 132 Minn. 446 , , 4 A. L. R. 1166; 3 Dunnell, Dig.
Krippner v. Matz 287 N.W. 19 Minn. 1939
Krippner v. Matz 287 N.W. 19 Minn. 1939
Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , , 4 A. L. R. 1166.” The meat of that decision is contained in the syllabus paragraphs of the court ( 133 Minn. 447 -448, , 3 A. L. R. 468) as follows: “The relation of attorney and client does not preclude the latter from settling and compromising the matters in litigation in his own way
Myhra v. Park 258 N.W. 515 Minn. 1935
Myhra v. Park 258 N.W. 515 Minn. 1935
In support thereof he cites Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , , 4 A. L. R. 1166, and many other cases.
Ross v. Amiret Farmers Elevator Co. 226 N.W. 417 Minn. 1929
Ross v. Amiret Farmers Elevator Co. 226 N.W. 417 Minn. 1929
In Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , , 4 A. L. R. 1166, plaintiff brought action to recover for services and alleged both an express contract and quantum meruit.
Gustafson v. Gustafson 226 N.W. 412 Minn. 1929
Gustafson v. Gustafson 226 N.W. 412 Minn. 1929
ion.” In the latter case the judgment in the first suit does operate as an estoppel, but only as to any “point or question actually litigated and determined.” 15 R. C. L. 962, 973; O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , , 79 A. S. R. 426; Kinzel v. B. & D. F. L. Co. 124 Minn. 416 , ; Maguire v. Maguire, 171 Minn. 492 , , ; Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , , 4 A. L. R. 1166.
Fifield v. Bieisanz 209 N.W. 259 Minn. 1926
Fifield v. Bieisanz 209 N.W. 259 Minn. 1926
Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , , 4 A. L. R. 1166; Morrison v. Lejourburg, 124 Minn. 495 , .
Stothard v. Shanley 207 N.W. 198 Minn. 1926
Stothard v. Shanley 207 N.W. 198 Minn. 1926
247; Kaaterud v. Gilbertson, 96 Minn. 66 , ; Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , , 4 A. L. R. 1166.
Shake v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York 196 N.W. 804 Minn. 1924
Shake v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York 196 N.W. 804 Minn. 1924
Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , , 4 A. L. R. 1166.
Fox v. Fox 191 N.W. 420 Minn. 1923
Fox v. Fox 191 N.W. 420 Minn. 1923
Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , , 4 A. L. R. 1166.
James v. Pettis 159 N.W. 953 Minn. 1916
James v. Pettis 159 N.W. 953 Minn. 1916
Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , , and cases cited.
State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Great Northern Railway Co. 158 N.W. 972 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Great Northern Railway Co. 158 N.W. 972 Minn. 1916
Irish American Bank v. Ludlum, 56 Minn. 317 , ; Macomb Sewer-Pipe Co. v. Hanley, 61 Minn. 350 , ; Augir v. Ryan, 63 Minn. 373 , ; Neilson v. Pennsylvania, C. & O. Co. 78 Minn. 113 , ; Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , .
Southworth v. Rosendahl 158 N.W. 717 Minn. 1916
Southworth v. Rosendahl 158 N.W. 717 Minn. 1916
Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , .
Wipperman Mercantile Co. v. Jacobson 158 N.W. 606 Minn. 1916
Wipperman Mercantile Co. v. Jacobson 158 N.W. 606 Minn. 1916
Leonard v. Schall, 132 Minn. 446 , .