Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Erickson v. Minnesota & Ontario Power Co., 158 N.W. 979.

26 citing documents.

TJD Dissolution Corp. v. Savoie Supply Co. 460 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
TJD Dissolution Corp. v. Savoie Supply Co. 460 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
866 (1890) overruled on other grounds, Erickson v. Minnesota & Ontario Power Co., 134 Minn. 209, 215 , 158 N.W.
L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp. 446 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1989
L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp. 446 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1989
866, 866 (1890), overruled on other grounds, Erickson v. Minnesota & Ontario Power Co., 134 Minn. 209, 215 , 158 N.W.
Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1955
Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1955
7 Thayer v. Duffy, 240 Minn. 234 , 63 N. W. (2d) 28 ; Gilloley v. Sampson, 203 Minn. 233 , ; Erickson v. Minnesota & Ontario Power Co. 134 Minn. 209 , ; Jacobson v. Brasie Motor Car Co. 132 Minn, 417, .
Garber v. Bancamerica-Blair Corporation 285 N.W. 723 Minn. 1939
Garber v. Bancamerica-Blair Corporation 285 N.W. 723 Minn. 1939
Erickson v. Minnesota & Ontario Power Co. 134 Minn. 209 , , did not involve any question of jurisdiction of a parent corporation by reason of the presence of its subsidiary in the state.
Gilloley v. Sampson 281 N.W. 3 Minn. 1938
Gilloley v. Sampson 281 N.W. 3 Minn. 1938
In Erickson v. Minnesota & Ontario Power Co. 134 Minn. 209 , , Ave held that where the plaintiff made out a prmia facie case shoAving that he is entitled to recover substantial damages, but that through inadvertence or other cause competent proof of the amount has not been made, a new trial Avill be granted.
Meyers v. Lafayette Club, Inc. 266 N.W. 861 Minn. 1936
Meyers v. Lafayette Club, Inc. 266 N.W. 861 Minn. 1936
Plaintiffs quote from Erickson v. Minnesota & Ontario Power Co. 134 Minn. 209, 212 , , as foIIoavs : “The OAvner of land abutting upon a lake or stream is entitled to have the water maintained at the natural and ordinary level at all times, and this rule applies to ordinary Ioav water and ordinary high water.” That case involved the issue of recovery of damages for flooding l
Smith v. Altier 238 N.W. 479 Minn. 1931
Smith v. Altier 238 N.W. 479 Minn. 1931
Foster v. Wagener, 129 Minn. 11 , ; Erickson v. M. & O. Power Co. 134 Minn. 209 , .
Gustafson v. Trocke Cafeteria Co. 219 N.W. 159 Minn. 1928
Gustafson v. Trocke Cafeteria Co. 219 N.W. 159 Minn. 1928
Erickson v. M. & O. Power Co. 134 Minn. 209 , , overruling, on the point of present importance, Potter v. Mellen.
Belle City Malleable Iron Co. v. Clark 215 N.W. 855 Minn. 1927
Belle City Malleable Iron Co. v. Clark 215 N.W. 855 Minn. 1927
R. 131; Erickson v. Minnesota & Ontario Power Co. 134 Minn. 209 , .
Casey v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 213 N.W. 57 Minn. 1927
Casey v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 213 N.W. 57 Minn. 1927
Co. 160 Minn. 515 , ; Erickson v. M. & O. Power Co. 134 Minn. 209 , .
State v. Great Northern Railway Co. 200 N.W. 834 Minn. 1924
State v. Great Northern Railway Co. 200 N.W. 834 Minn. 1924
Ct. 873, 59 L. ed. 1438; Erickson v. Minnesota & Ontario Power Co. 134 Minn. 209 , .
Reinkey v. Findley Electric Co. 180 N.W. 236 Minn. 1920
Reinkey v. Findley Electric Co. 180 N.W. 236 Minn. 1920
Knowles v. Steele, 59 Minn. 452 , ; Erickson v. Minnesota & O. P. Co. 134 Minn. 209 , , and cases reviewed; 2 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
State ex rel. Burrows v. Truax 166 N.W. 339 Minn. 1918
State ex rel. Burrows v. Truax 166 N.W. 339 Minn. 1918
Erickson v. Minnesota & O. P. Co. 134 Minn. 209 , .