Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. District Court of Fourth Judicial District, 158 N.W. 240.

27 citing documents.

City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line Railroad 742 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line Railroad 742 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Ford Motor Co. v. District Court, 133 Minn. 221 , 158 N.W.
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Groppoli 202 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1972
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Groppoli 202 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1972
Ford Motor Co. v. District Court, 133 Minn. 221, 227 , that “it is the duty of the courts to intervene for the protection of the property own *9 er whenever it clearly appears that, under the guise of taking his property for a proper purpose, it is in fact being taken for an improper purpose.” This is such a case.
County of Hennepin v. Mikulay 194 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1972
County of Hennepin v. Mikulay 194 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1972
Ford Motor Co. v. District Court, IBS Minn. 221, , the conditions for the exercise of the power are not present.
State v. Wren, Inc. 146 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1966
State v. Wren, Inc. 146 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1966
Ford Motor Co. v. District Court, 133 Minn. 221 , .
Town of Lebanon v. Land Holding Co. 143 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1966
Town of Lebanon v. Land Holding Co. 143 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1966
Ford Motor Co. v. District Court, 133 Minn. 221 , .
The Kelmar Corp. v. District Court 130 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1964
The Kelmar Corp. v. District Court 130 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1964
Ford Motor Co. v. District Court, 133 Minn. 221 , , and State ex rel.
Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp. v. City of St. Louis Park 121 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1963
Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp. v. City of St. Louis Park 121 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1963
Ford Motor Co. v. District Court, 133 Minn. 221 , ; Independent School Dist.
HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co. 104 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1960
HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co. 104 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1960
Ford Motor Co. v. District Court, 133 Minn. 221 , , the conditions for the exercise of the power are not present.
Penn-O-Tex Oil Co. v. City of Minneapolis 291 N.W. 131 Minn. 1940
Penn-O-Tex Oil Co. v. City of Minneapolis 291 N.W. 131 Minn. 1940
Ford Motor Co. v. District Court, 133 Minn. 221 , .
In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles Park 188 N.W. 54 Minn. 1922
In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles Park 188 N.W. 54 Minn. 1922
The question was not raised or considered in State v. District Court F. J. D. 133 Minn. 221 , , 136 Minn. 475 , , where certiorari was resorted to in a condemnation proceedings under the Elwell Law.
Ford Motor Co. v. City of Minneapolis 179 N.W. 907 Minn. 1920
Ford Motor Co. v. City of Minneapolis 179 N.W. 907 Minn. 1920
State v. District Court of Fourth Judicial District, 133 Minn. 221 , , and 136 Minn. 475 , .
State ex rel. Twin City Building & Investment Co. v. Houghton 174 N.W. 885 Minn. 1919
Ford Motor Co. v. City of Minneapolis 173 N.W. 713 Minn. 1919
Ford Motor Co. v. City of Minneapolis 173 N.W. 713 Minn. 1919
The motor company attacked the validity of the proceedings by writ of certiorari and the matter was before this court twice, the decisions being reported in 133 Minn. 221 , , and 136 Minn. 475 , .
State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. District Court 162 N.W. 1087 Minn. 1917
State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. District Court 162 N.W. 1087 Minn. 1917
A like order in the same proceeding was reversed in State v. District Court of Fourth Judicial District, 133 Minn. 221 , .