Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Anderson v. Wormser, 151 N.W. 423.

29 citing documents.

  • State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc. 718 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 2006
    Paul Gaslight Co., 129 Minn. 55 , our court has “applied a strict rule of liability when gas escapes from a pipe over which the [gas] company has control and for which it is responsible.” Wilson , 267 Minn, at 173, d at 732 .
  • State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc. 697 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    Paul Gaslight Co., 129 Minn. 55, 57 , (stating that *644 Gould “goes to the proposition that the manufacturer and distributor of illuminating gas is held in damages for the escape of gas on the principle of negligence ...
  • Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co. 344 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1984
    Paul Gaslight Co., 129 Minn. 55
  • Quigley v. Village of Hibbing 129 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1964
    Paul Gaslight Co. 129 Minn. 55 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 1022.
  • Distinguished Wilson v. Home Gas Co. Inc. 125 N.W.2d 725 Minn. 1964
    Paul Gaslight Co. 129 Minn. 55 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 1022, and Gould v. Winona Gas Co. 100 Minn. 258 , , 10 L.R.A.
  • DeVries v. City of Austin 110 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1961
    Paul Gaslight Co. 129 Minn. 55 , , L.R.A.
  • Ondarko v. Village of Hibbing 96 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1959
    Paul Gaslight Co. 129 Minn. 55 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 1022.
  • Donald v. Moses 94 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1959
  • Donald v. Moses 94 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1959
    Barnabas Hospital, 231 Minn. 384 , 43 N. W. (2d) 221 ; Dehen v. Beming, 198 Minn. 522 , ; Farnum v. Peterson-Biddick Co. 182 Minn. 338 , ; Anderson v. Wormser, 129 Minn. 8 , ; Steinbauer v. Stone, 85 Minn. 274 , 88 N. W. *195 754; 19 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Bellefuil v. WILLMAR GAS CO. INC. 66 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1954
    Paul Gaslight Co. 129 Minn. 55 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 1022.
  • Fabbrizi v. Village of Hibbing 66 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1954
    Paul Gaslight Co. 129 Minn. 55 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 1022, and instructed the jury as follows: “This duty or responsibility of the village continues in the handling of the gas so long as it remains the property of the defendant, which is until it passes through the meter into the consumer’s premises.
  • Adelmann v. Elk River Lumber Co. 65 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1954
  • Adelmann v. Elk River Lumber Co. 65 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1954
    Anderson v. Wormser, 129 Minn. 8 , ; Farnum v. Peterson-Biddick Co. 182 Minn. 338 , ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Harris v. Eggermont 265 N.W. 322 Minn. 1936
  • Harris v. Eggermont 265 N.W. 322 Minn. 1936
    Anderson v. Wormser, 129 Minn. 8 , 151 N.W.
  • Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
  • Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
  • Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
    Anderson v. Wormser, 129 Minn. 8 , ; Van Doren v. Wright, 65 Minn. 80 , , ; Lufkin v. Harvey, 131 Minn. 238 , , L. R. A. 1916B, 1111, Ann. Cas.
  • Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
    Anderson v. Wormser, 129 Minn. 8 , 151 N.W.
  • Vukos v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 217 N.W. 125 Minn. 1927
  • Vukos v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 217 N.W. 125 Minn. 1927
    Van Doren v. Wright, 65 Minn. 80 , , ; Rihmann v. Grant Const. Co. 114 Minn. 484 , ; Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Anderson v. Wormser, 129 Minn. 8 , ; Zakrzewski v. G. N. Ry.
  • Goar v. Village of Stephen 196 N.W. 171 Minn. 1923
    Paul Gaslight Co. 129 Minn. 55 , , L. R. A. 1915E, 1022, Ann Cas.
  • Barrett v. Van Duzee 166 N.W. 407 Minn. 1918
  • Barrett v. Van Duzee 166 N.W. 407 Minn. 1918
    It certainly is not a misstatement of the facts condemned in the decision of Larkin v. City of Minneapolis, 112 Minn. 311, 315 , , and Anderson v. Wormser, 129 Minn. 8 , , cited by appellant.
  • Grimes v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co. 158 N.W. 623 Minn. 1916
    Paul Gaslight Co. 129 Minn. 55 , , L.R.A.
  • Lufkin v. Harvey 154 N.W. 1097 Minn. 1915
  • Lufkin v. Harvey 154 N.W. 1097 Minn. 1915
    Reed v. Lammel, 40 Minn. 397 , ; Rugland v. Tollefsen, 53 Minn. 267 , ; Van Doren v. Wright, 65 Minn. 80 , , ; Anderson v. Wormser, 129 Minn. 8 ; .
  • Zakrzewski v. Great Northern Railway Co. 154 N.W. 966 Minn. 1915
  • Zakrzewski v. Great Northern Railway Co. 154 N.W. 966 Minn. 1915
    Reed v. Lammel, 40 Minn. 397 , ; Rugland v. Tollefsen, 53 Minn. 267 , ; Van Doren v. Wright, 65 Minn. 80 , *178 , Anderson v. Wormser, 129 Minn. 8 , .