Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 151 N.W. 976.

40 citing documents.

White v. Johnson 137 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 1965
White v. Johnson 137 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 1965
See, Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 1111.
Petersen v. Swan 57 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1953
Petersen v. Swan 57 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1953
It is generally true, as between husband and wife, that the duty to support the family rests on the husband (Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 1111), but, where the wife uses her own money, or permits her husband to do so, to pay household expenses under circumstances which disclose that she did not intend to be repaid, she has no claim upon her husband for such expenditures.
Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne 34 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1948
Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne 34 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1948
We might add Weltsch v. Town of Stark, 65 Minn. 5 , , and Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 1111, Ann. Cas.
Olson v. City of Virginia 300 N.W. 42 Minn. 1941
Olson v. City of Virginia 300 N.W. 42 Minn. 1941
Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 1111, *68 Ann. Cas.
St. John v. City of St. Paul 228 N.W. 170 Minn. 1929
St. John v. City of St. Paul 228 N.W. 170 Minn. 1929
Other cases in this court tending to support this view are Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1915D, *16 1111, Ann. Cas.
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
In Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 1111, Ann. Cas.
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
In Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , 151 N.W.
Mokovich v. Independent School District No. 22 225 N.W. 292 Minn. 1929
Mokovich v. Independent School District No. 22 225 N.W. 292 Minn. 1929
Mokovich v. Independent School District No. 22 225 N.W. 292 Minn. 1929
Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 1111, Ann. Cas.
Mokovich v. Independent School District No. 22 225 N.W. 292 Minn. 1929
Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , 151 N.W.
Nelson v. City of Duluth 214 N.W. 774 Minn. 1927
Nelson v. City of Duluth 214 N.W. 774 Minn. 1927
The evidence brings the case within the exception to the general rule stated in Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 1111, Ann. Cas.
Howard v. City of Stillwater 214 N.W. 656 Minn. 1927
Howard v. City of Stillwater 214 N.W. 656 Minn. 1927
Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 1111, Ann. Cas.
Hebert v. Village of Hibbing 212 N.W. 186 Minn. 1927
Hebert v. Village of Hibbing 212 N.W. 186 Minn. 1927
Weber v. City of Minneapolis, 132 Minn. 170 , ; Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 1111, Ann. Cas.
Boyd v. City of Duluth 204 N.W. 562 Minn. 1925
Boyd v. City of Duluth 204 N.W. 562 Minn. 1925
This conclusion finds support in Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 1111, Ann. Cas.
Emmons v. City of Virginia 188 N.W. 561 Minn. 1922
Emmons v. City of Virginia 188 N.W. 561 Minn. 1922
In Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 1111, Ann. Cas.
Roerig v. Houghton 175 N.W. 542 Minn. 1919
Roerig v. Houghton 175 N.W. 542 Minn. 1919
708 ; Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L.R.A.
Hampton v. City of Duluth 168 N.W. 20 Minn. 1918
Hampton v. City of Duluth 168 N.W. 20 Minn. 1918
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 138 Minn. 350 , ; Weber v. City of Minneapolis, 132 Minn. 170 , ; Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , ; Smith v. City of Cloquet, 120 Minn. 50 , ; Larkin v. City of Minneapolis, 112 Minn. 311 , ; Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55 , .
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 165 N.W. 134 Minn. 1917
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 165 N.W. 134 Minn. 1917
Larkin v. City of Minneapolis, 112 Minn. 311 , ; Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L.R.A.
Kosanke v. Kosanke 162 N.W. 1060 Minn. 1917
Kosanke v. Kosanke 162 N.W. 1060 Minn. 1917
Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L.R.A.
Hillstrom v. City of St. Paul 159 N.W. 1076 Minn. 1916
Hillstrom v. City of St. Paul 159 N.W. 1076 Minn. 1916
1913C, 1311; Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , , L.R.A.
Weber v. City of Minneapolis 156 N.W. 287 Minn. 1916
Weber v. City of Minneapolis 156 N.W. 287 Minn. 1916
Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190, 197 , , L.R.A.