Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co., 151 N.W. 914.

25 citing documents.

Dwinnell v. Oftedahl 51 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1952
Dwinnell v. Oftedahl 51 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1952
See, Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 129 Minn. 145 , Jacobson v. C. M. & St.
Beck v. Northwestern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 288 N.W. 217 Minn. 1939
Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co. 212 N.W. 892 Minn. 1927
Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co. 212 N.W. 892 Minn. 1927
Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Drake v. Fairmont D. T. & B. Co. 129 Minn. 145 , ; Fawkes v. Knapp, 138 Minn. 384 , ; Labar v. Lindstrom, 158 Minn. 453 , ; Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , .
Labar v. Lindstrom 197 N.W. 756 Minn. 1924
Labar v. Lindstrom 197 N.W. 756 Minn. 1924
Lindquist v. Gibbs, 122 Minn. 205 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Drake v. Fairmont D. T. & B. Co. 129 Minn. 145 , ; Ludowese v. Amidon, 124 Minn. 288 , .
Tischer v. Bardin 194 N.W. 3 Minn. 1923
Tischer v. Bardin 194 N.W. 3 Minn. 1923
1918A, 355; Drake v. Fairmont Drain & Tile Co. 129 Minn. 145 , ; Schlechter v. Felton, 134 Minn. 143 , , L. R, A. 1917A, 556; 12 R. C. L. 349.
Duholm v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 177 N.W. 772 Minn. 1920
Duholm v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 177 N.W. 772 Minn. 1920
485; Freeman v. F. P. Harbaugh Co. 114 Minn. 283 , ; Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 129 Minn. 145 , .
Fawkes v. Knapp 165 N.W. 236 Minn. 1917
Fawkes v. Knapp 165 N.W. 236 Minn. 1917
Drake v. Fairmont Drain T. & B. Co. 129 Minn. 145 , ; Martin v. Hill, supra; Pennington v. Roberge, supra.
Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 163 N.W. 665 Minn. 1917
Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 163 N.W. 665 Minn. 1917
628; Drake v. Fairmont D. T. & B. Co. 129 Minn. 145 , ; Jacobson v. Chicago, M. & St.
Schlechter v. Felton 158 N.W. 813 Minn. 1916
Schlechter v. Felton 158 N.W. 813 Minn. 1916
Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 129 Minn. 145 , , and Jacobson v. Chicago, M. & St.
Johnson v. Olsen 158 N.W. 805 Minn. 1916
Johnson v. Olsen 158 N.W. 805 Minn. 1916
§ 3819; Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 129 Minn. 145 , ; Bullitt v. Farrar, 42 Minn. 8 , , 6 L.R.A.
Woodward v. Western Canada Colonization Co. 158 N.W. 706 Minn. 1916
Woodward v. Western Canada Colonization Co. 158 N.W. 706 Minn. 1916
Knappen v. Freeman, 47 Minn. 491 , (representation that land is high and rolling and fit for cultivation); Schmeisser v. Albinson, 119 Minn. 428 , (character of soil and amount of crop previous year); Petrie v. Clarke, 126 Minn. 119 , Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 129 Minn. 145 , (that land contained clay suitable for tile making).
Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 156 N.W. 251 Minn. 1916
Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 156 N.W. 251 Minn. 1916
§ 3819; Drake v. Fairmont Drain, Tile & B. Co. 129 Minn. 145 , ; Brooks v. Hamilton, 15 Minn. 10 (26); Hedin v. Minneapolis M. & S. Assn. 62 Minn. 146 , , 35 L.R.A.
Kempf v. Ranger 155 N.W. 1059 Minn. 1916
Kempf v. Ranger 155 N.W. 1059 Minn. 1916
The law on this subject will be found fully discussed in Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; Pennington v. Eoberge, 122 Minn. 295 , , and Drake v. Fairmont D. T. & B. Co. 129 Minn. 145 , .