19,126-(71)
Precedential
Appeal dismissed.
Processed
Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley
Cited by
- Metropolitan Sheet Metal Journeyman & Apprentice Training Trust Fund v. County of Ramsey 832 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 2013
- Burkholder v. Burkholder 43 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1950
- Hoyt v. Kittson County State Bank 230 N.W. 269 Minn. 1930
- Greber v. Harris 209 N.W. 30 Minn. 1926
- Swanson v. Alworth 196 N.W. 260 Minn. 1923
- Chicago Great Western Railroad v. Zahner 182 N.W. 904 Minn. 1921
- Blied v. Barnard 153 N.W. 305 Minn. 1915
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley 124 Minn. 183
- Hanley v. Board of County Commissioners 87 Minn. 209
- Stromme v. Rieck 110 Minn. 472
- McCauley v. Wuest 125 N.W. 1021
Opinion text
Per Curiam. Upon a former appeal in this ease a new trial was granted. Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley, 124 Minn. 183 , 144 N. W. 768 . After the case had been remanded, plaintiff made an application to file an amended and supplemental complaint. This application was denied by the trial court, and plaintiff appealed from the order denying it. It is well settled that such an order, made before judgment, is not appealable. Hanley v. Board of Co. Commrs. of Cass County, 87 Minn. 209 , 91 N. W. 756 ; Stromme v. Rieck, 110 Minn. 472 , 125 N. W. 1021 . It follows that the appeal must be dismissed. So ordered.