Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lawler v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co., 152 N.W. 882.

29 citing documents.

Blaske v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 37 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1949
Blaske v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 37 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1949
Ohrmann v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 27 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1947
Ohrmann v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 27 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1947
Co. 129 Minn. 506, 508 , ; cf. Union P. R. Co. v. Burnham (10 Cir.) 124 F. (2d) 500, 502; Roth v. Swanson (8 Cir.) 145 F. (2d) 262; Annotation, 98 A. L. R. 161, 167; 44 Am.
Bryant v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 23 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1946
Bryant v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 23 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1946
Co. 129 Minn. 506, 509 , , we referred to the question in the following language : “* * * There is some conflict in the evidence as to the speed of the train, the same being estimated all the way from 48 to 60 miles an hour; * * * defendant maintained no gates at this crossing, nor a flagman to warn pedestrians * * *
Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 5 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1942
Engberg v. Great Northern Railway Co. 290 N.W. 579 Minn. 1940
Engberg v. Great Northern Railway Co. 290 N.W. 579 Minn. 1940
Munkel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 278 N.W. 41 Minn. 1938
Munkel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 278 N.W. 41 Minn. 1938
Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 276 N.W. 813 Minn. 1937
Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 276 N.W. 813 Minn. 1937
Co. 129 Minn. 506 , Richard v. Maine Cent.
Lawson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 219 N.W. 554 Minn. 1928
Lawson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 219 N.W. 554 Minn. 1928
Co. 129 Minn. 506 , ; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , ; Perkins v. C. M. & St.
Molden v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 200 N.W. 740 Minn. 1924
Molden v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 200 N.W. 740 Minn. 1924
Co. 129 Minn. 506 , ; Zenner v. Great North.
Moore v. P. J. Downes Co. 185 N.W. 395 Minn. 1921
Moore v. P. J. Downes Co. 185 N.W. 395 Minn. 1921
Hollister v. Hines 184 N.W. 856 Minn. 1921
Hollister v. Hines 184 N.W. 856 Minn. 1921
Co. 129 Minn. 506 , , it was held that the failure to provide gates, or a flagman or a signal bell at the crossing of the principal street of a village *188 of 700 people, was an element to be taken into consideration in determining whether it was negligence to run a train over that crossing at a speed of 50 miles an hour
Hume v. Duluth & Iron Range Railroad 183 N.W. 288 Minn. 1921
Hume v. Duluth & Iron Range Railroad 183 N.W. 288 Minn. 1921
Co. 129 Minn. 506 , ; Zenner v. Great Northern Ry.
Gowan v. McAdoo 173 N.W. 440 Minn. 1919
Gowan v. McAdoo 173 N.W. 440 Minn. 1919
Co. 129 Minn. 506 , ; Zenner v. Great Northern Ry.
Zenner v. Great Northern Railway Co. 159 N.W. 1087 Minn. 1916
Zenner v. Great Northern Railway Co. 159 N.W. 1087 Minn. 1916
Co. 129 Minn. 506 , , is not an authority to the contrary.
Martin v. Great Northern Railway Co. 155 N.W. 1047 Minn. 1916
Martin v. Great Northern Railway Co. 155 N.W. 1047 Minn. 1916
Co. 129 Minn. 506 , , was another death case.