DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Smith v. Great Northern Railway Co., 155 N.W. 1040.

21 citing documents.

  • Stone v. Jetmar Properties, LLC 733 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
    Historically, a de facto corporation could exist in Minnesota when there was “(1) some law under which a corporation with powers assumed might lawfully have been created; (2) a colorable and bona fide attempt to perfect an organization under such a law; and (3) user of the rights claimed to have been conferred by the law.” Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59, 61
  • Almac, Inc. v. JRH Development, Inc. 391 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59, 61
  • Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington 115 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1962
    Burnquist v. Village of North Pole, 213 Minn. 297 , 6 N. W. (2d) 458 ; Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , ; State ex rel.
  • Slezak v. Ousdigian 110 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1961
    In Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59, 63 , , where some taxpayers sought to enjoin issuance of bonds and other proceedings upon consolidation of school districts, the court held that in the absence of statute quo warranto was the exclusive proceeding to determine validity of the actions in question, saying: “* * * A private citizen having no interest dis
  • In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn County 246 Minn. 96 Minn. 1956
    [5] Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , ; Mokovich v. Independent School Dist.
  • Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44 74 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1956
    Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , ; Mokovich v. Independent School Dist.
  • State Ex Rel. Harrier v. Village of Spring Lake Park 71 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1955
    Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , .
  • Bowman v. City of Moorhead 36 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1949
    See, State v. Honerud, 66 Minn. 32, 34 , ; Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59, 62 , .
  • State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Village of North Pole 6 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1942
    And our cases uniformly hold that “quo warranto is the proper and, in the absence of statute, the exclusive proceeding to determine the * * * legal existence or validity of the organization of a public corporation.” Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59, 68 , ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Longcor v. City of Red Wing 289 N.W. 570 Minn. 1940
    For instance, compare Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , , and the Regan case, supra.
  • State Ex Rel. Town of Stuntz v. City of Chisholm 264 N.W. 798 Minn. 1936
    Relator is not a "private citizen having no interest distinct from that of the public," within the rule of Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , 63 , , 1042 .
  • Klaman v. Hitchcock 231 N.W. 716 Minn. 1930
  • Klaman v. Hitchcock 231 N.W. 716 Minn. 1930
    Co. *114 132 Minn. 147 , , ; State v. Hines, 148 Minn. 393 , ; Outcelt v. C. B. & Q. R. Co. 150 Minn. 398 , ; Spangenberg v. Christian, 151 Minn. 356 , ; Rimmer v. Cohen, 172 Minn. 134 , .
  • Dennistoun v. Davis 229 N.W. 353 Minn. 1930
    Ruesswig v. McDonald, 101 Minn. 349 , ; Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , .
  • School District No. 1 v. Aiton 217 N.W. 496 Minn. 1928
    Finnegan v. Noerenberg, 52 Minn. 239 , , 18 L. R. A. 778, 38 A. S. R. 552; Johnson v. Okerstrom, 70 Minn. 303 , ; Healey v. Steele Center Creamery Assn. 115 Minn. 451 , ; Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , ; Moe v. Harris, 142 Minn. 442 , ; Harrill v. Davis (C. C. A.) 168 F. 187 , 22 L.R.A.
  • Mabel First Lutheran Church v. Cadwallader 215 N.W. 845 Minn. 1927
    Finnegan v. Noerenberg, 52 Minn. 239 , , 18 L. R. A. 778, 38 A. S. R. 552; Baltimore & P. R. Co. v. Fifth Baptist Church, 137 U. S. 568 , 11 S. Ct. 184 , 34 L. ed. 784; Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , ; 7 R. C. L. 60, § 42 et seq.; 14 C. J. 213, § 223 et seq.
  • Common School District No. 102 v. Consolidated School District No. 111-74 211 N.W. 960 Minn. 1927
    The following authorities might lead to the conclusion that in this action the order is not open to attack: State v. Honerud, 66 Minn. 32 , ; Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , ; Hammer v. Narverud, 142 Minn. 199 , .
  • Mingo v. Holleran 191 N.W. 416 Minn. 1922
    575 ; State v. Anding, 132 Minn. 36 , ; State v. Teal, 72 Minn. 37 , .
  • School District No. 135 v. McConnell 184 N.W. 369 Minn. 1921
    And see Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , .
  • Hammer v. Narverud 171 N.W. 770 Minn. 1919
    Paul Gaslight Co. v. Village of Sandstone, 73 Minn. 225 , ; Snow v. Village of Excelsior, 115 Minn. 102 , ; Evens v. Anderson, 132 *203 Minn. 59 , .
  • Cooper, Myers & Co. v. Smith 166 N.W. 504 Minn. 1918
    See Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , .