Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 153 N.W. 876.

26 citing documents.

Eustice Ex Rel. Eustice v. Jewison 413 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1987
Eustice Ex Rel. Eustice v. Jewison 413 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1987
129 (1938); Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 130 Minn. 462 , 153 N.W.
Bengtson v. Setterberg 35 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1949
Bengtson v. Setterberg 35 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1949
The homestead, therefore, never becomes, even for an instant, a part of the estate of a decedent for the purposes of administration, so long as the homestead right continues.” Somewhat the same situation exists in the case of Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 130 Minn. 462 , , Ann. Cas.
Hoverson v. Hoverson 12 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1943
Hoverson v. Hoverson 12 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1943
She “could make such disposition” of her “life term” as she “saw fit,” but “could not * * * subject the fee which had' vested in the children to any burdens whatever.” Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 130 Minn. 462, 467 , , Ann. Cas.
Turner v. Edwards 292 N.W. 257 Minn. 1940
Turner v. Edwards 292 N.W. 257 Minn. 1940
Paul T. Co. v. Mintzer, 65 Minn. 124 , , 32 L. R. A. 756, 60 A. S. R. 444; Baldwin v. Zien, 117 Minn. 178, 186 , ; Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 130 Minn. 462 , , Ann Cas.
Kohrt v. Mercer 282 N.W. 129 Minn. 1938
Kohrt v. Mercer 282 N.W. 129 Minn. 1938
Here, as in Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 130 Minn. 462, 467 , , Ann. Cas.
Trask v. Russell 258 N.W. 164 Minn. 1935
Trask v. Russell 258 N.W. 164 Minn. 1935
Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 130 Minn. 462 , , Ann. Cas.
In Re Estate of Christianson 253 N.W. 661 Minn. 1934
In Re Estate of Christianson 253 N.W. 661 Minn. 1934
Wilson v. Proctor, 28 Minn. 13 , ; Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 130 Minn. 462 , , Ann. Cas.
Day v. Day 230 N.W. 634 Minn. 1930
Day v. Day 230 N.W. 634 Minn. 1930
Smalley v. Isaacson, 40 Minn. 450 , ; Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 130 Minn. 462 , , Ann. Cas.
In Re Application of Lee 213 N.W. 736 Minn. 1927
In Re Application of Lee 213 N.W. 736 Minn. 1927
Upon the death of William E. Thompson, the life estate of his widow and the remainder in fee of his son in his homestead vested without any act on their part “or on the part of the prohate court.” Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 130 Minn. 462 , , Ann. Cas.
Rendahl v. Hall 200 N.W. 744 Minn. 1924
Rendahl v. Hall 200 N.W. 744 Minn. 1924
Smalley v. Isaacson, 40 Minn. 450 , ; Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 130 Minn. 462 , .
Barrett v. Heim 188 N.W. 207 Minn. 1922
Barrett v. Heim 188 N.W. 207 Minn. 1922
*150 In Stromberg v. Stromberg, 119 Minn. 325 , , tbe court referring to section 7308 said [p. 327]: “Tbe part tbe widow is entitled to is not to be included in tbe estate to be administered upon, and is not subject to tbe expenses of administration or tbe payment of proved claims, and is no part of tbe residue to be distributed.” See also Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 130 Minn. 462 , , Ann. Cas.
In re the Estate of Murphy 146 Minn. 418 Minn. 1920
In re the Estate of Murphy 146 Minn. 418 Minn. 1920
Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 130 Minn. 462 , , Ann. Cas.
Rux v. Adam 172 N.W. 912 Minn. 1919
Rux v. Adam 172 N.W. 912 Minn. 1919
G. S. 1913, § 7337; Wilson v; Proctor, 28 Minn. 13 , ; Sammons v. Higbie’s Estate, 103 Minn. 448 , ; Nordlund v. Dahlgren, 130 Minn. 462 , , Ann. Cas.