Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 153 N.W. 527.

50 citing documents.

Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252, 255 , 153 N.W.
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
If the action is one at law, “either party may demand a jury trial.” Olson, d at 149 (quoting Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252, 254 , 153 N.W.
Storms v. Schneider 802 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Storms v. Schneider 802 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
at 149 (quoting Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252, 255 , 153 N.W.
Onvoy, Inc. v. Allete, Inc. 736 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2007
Onvoy, Inc. v. Allete, Inc. 736 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2007
Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252, 254 , 153 N.W.
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
127, 129 (1917) (“The term ‘cases at law’ as used in the Constitution has been construed as referring to ordinary common-law actions as distinguished from equity or admiralty causes and special proceedings such as quo warranto, mandamus and the like”); Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252, 254-55 , 153 N.W.
Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2001
Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2001
See Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252, 254-55 , 153 N.W.
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1993
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1993
Breimhorst v. Beckman, 221 Minn. 409, 433, Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252, 254 , 153 N.W.
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252, 254 , 153 N.W.
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 493 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 493 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252, 254 , 153 N.W.
Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc. 463 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1990
Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc. 463 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1990
Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252, 255 , 153 N.W.
Appeal of Ewert v. City of Winthrop 278 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1979
Appeal of Ewert v. City of Winthrop 278 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1979
See, Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252, 254 , 153 N.W.
Smith v. Bailen 258 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1977
Smith v. Bailen 258 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1977
See, also, Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252 , 153 N.W.
Parsons Electric Co. v. Village of Watertown 169 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1969
Parsons Electric Co. v. Village of Watertown 169 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1969
Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252, 255 , .
Rognrud v. Zubert 165 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1969
Rognrud v. Zubert 165 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1969
E. g., Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc. 268 Minn. 176 , 128 N. W. (2d) 334 ; *434 Breimhorst v. Beckman, 227 Minn. 409 , 35 N. W. (2d) 719 ; Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252 , ; Whallon v. Bancroft, 4 Minn. 70 (109).
Johnson v. Johnson 137 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1965
Johnson v. Johnson 137 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1965
Co. v. American Surety Co. 207 Minn. 117 , , 126 A. L. R. 1351; Plunkett v. Lampert, 231 Minn. 484 , 43 N. W. (2d) 489 ; Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252 , .
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc. 128 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1964
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc. 128 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1964
Co. v. American Surety Co. 207 Minn. 117 , , 126 A. L. R. 1351; Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252 , ; and Coughlin v. Farmers & Mechanics Sav.
Landgraf v. Ellsworth 126 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1964
Landgraf v. Ellsworth 126 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1964
1 See, also, Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252 , .
Georgopolis v. George 54 N.W.2d 137 Minn. 1952
Georgopolis v. George 54 N.W.2d 137 Minn. 1952
Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252, 153 N W. 527.
Coughlin v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank 271 N.W. 168 Minn. 1937
Coughlin v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank 271 N.W. 168 Minn. 1937
Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252 , ; Swanson v. Alworth, 168 Minn. 84 , .
Swanson v. Alworth 209 N.W. 907 Minn. 1926
Swanson v. Alworth 209 N.W. 907 Minn. 1926
We note the following, though not parallel in their facts, as helpful: Garner v. Reis, 25 Minn. 475 ; Fair v. Stickney Farm Co. 35 Minn. 380 , ; Bond v. Welcome, 61 Minn. 43 , ; Morton B. & T. Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252 , ; Pratt v. Tuttle, 136 Mass. 233 ; Marston v. Gould, 69 N. Y. 220 ; Parker v. John Pullman & Co. 36 App. Div. 208 , 56 N. Y. Supp. 734 ; Ferry v. Henry, 4 Pick.
Holland Piano Manufacturing Co. v. Smith 192 N.W. 355 Minn. 1923
Holland Piano Manufacturing Co. v. Smith 192 N.W. 355 Minn. 1923
Greenleaf v. Egan, 30 Minn. 316 , ; Judd v. Dike, 30 Minn. 380 , ; Chadbourne v. Zilsdorf, 34 Minn. 43 , ; Lace v. Fixen, 39 Minn. 46 , ; Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252 , .
Board of Water Commissioners v. Roselawn Cemetery 165 N.W. 279 Minn. 1917
Board of Water Commissioners v. Roselawn Cemetery 165 N.W. 279 Minn. 1917
Paul v. Nickl, 42 Minn. 262 , ; Morton *461 Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252 , 10 R. C. L. 187, § 161.
Hawley v. Wallace 163 N.W. 127 Minn. 1917
Williams v. Howes 162 N.W. 1049 Minn. 1917
Hawley v. Wallace 163 N.W. 127 Minn. 1917
1044; State v. Ryder, 126 Minn. 95 , ; Morton B. & T. Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252 , .
Williams v. Howes 162 N.W. 1049 Minn. 1917
As stated in Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252 , , if the action be one at law, and nothing more, plaintiff cannot be refused a jury trial.
Larson v. Larson 158 N.W. 707 Minn. 1916
Larson v. Larson 158 N.W. 707 Minn. 1916
Whether if the land had passed to an innocent holder, and the plaintiff’s rights had been lost, the action would *454 have been in equity within the general doctrine of Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252 , , or an action at law within the principle applied in Doney v. Clark, 55 Oh.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by