Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Evens v. Anderson, 155 N.W. 1040.

36 citing documents.

Stone v. Jetmar Properties, LLC 733 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Stone v. Jetmar Properties, LLC 733 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Historically, a de facto corporation could exist in Minnesota when there was “(1) some law under which a corporation with powers assumed might lawfully have been created; (2) a colorable and bona fide attempt to perfect an organization under such a law; and (3) user of the rights claimed to have been conferred by the law.” Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59, 61 , 155 N.W.
Almac, Inc. v. JRH Development, Inc. 391 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Almac, Inc. v. JRH Development, Inc. 391 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59, 61 , 155 N.W.
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington 115 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1962
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington 115 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1962
Burnquist v. Village of North Pole, 213 Minn. 297 , 6 N. W. (2d) 458 ; Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , ; State ex rel.
Slezak v. Ousdigian 110 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1961
Slezak v. Ousdigian 110 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1961
In Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59, 63 , , where some taxpayers sought to enjoin issuance of bonds and other proceedings upon consolidation of school districts, the court held that in the absence of statute quo warranto was the exclusive proceeding to determine validity of the actions in question, saying: “* * * A private citizen h
John Wright & Associates, Inc. v. City of Red Wing 97 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1959
Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44 74 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1956
In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn County 246 Minn. 96 Minn. 1956
In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn County 246 Minn. 96 Minn. 1956
[5] Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , 155 N.W.
Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44 74 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1956
Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , ; Mokovich v. Independent School Dist.
State Ex Rel. Harrier v. Village of Spring Lake Park 71 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1955
State Ex Rel. Harrier v. Village of Spring Lake Park 71 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1955
Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , .
Bowman v. City of Moorhead 36 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1949
Bowman v. City of Moorhead 36 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1949
See, State v. Honerud, 66 Minn. 32, 34 , ; Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59, 62 , .
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Village of North Pole 6 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1942
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Village of North Pole 6 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1942
And our cases uniformly hold that “quo warranto is the proper and, in the absence of statute, the exclusive proceeding to determine the * * * legal existence or validity of the organization of a public corporation.” Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59, 68 , ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
Longcor v. City of Red Wing 289 N.W. 570 Minn. 1940
Longcor v. City of Red Wing 289 N.W. 570 Minn. 1940
For instance, compare Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , , and the Regan case, supra.
State Ex Rel. Town of Stuntz v. City of Chisholm 264 N.W. 798 Minn. 1936
State Ex Rel. Town of Stuntz v. City of Chisholm 264 N.W. 798 Minn. 1936
Relator is not a "private citizen having no interest distinct from that of the public," within the rule of Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , 63 , 155 N.W.
Dennistoun v. Davis 229 N.W. 353 Minn. 1930
Dennistoun v. Davis 229 N.W. 353 Minn. 1930
Ruesswig v. McDonald, 101 Minn. 349 , ; Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , .
School District No. 1 v. Aiton 217 N.W. 496 Minn. 1928
School District No. 1 v. Aiton 217 N.W. 496 Minn. 1928
Finnegan v. Noerenberg, 52 Minn. 239 , , 18 L. R. A. 778, 38 A. S. R. 552; Johnson v. Okerstrom, 70 Minn. 303 , ; Healey v. Steele Center Creamery Assn. 115 Minn. 451 , ; Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , ; Moe v. Harris, 142 Minn. 442 , ; Harrill v. Davis (C. C. A.) 168 F. 187 , 22 L.R.A.
Mabel First Lutheran Church v. Cadwallader 215 N.W. 845 Minn. 1927
Mabel First Lutheran Church v. Cadwallader 215 N.W. 845 Minn. 1927
Finnegan v. Noerenberg, 52 Minn. 239 , , 18 L. R. A. 778, 38 A. S. R. 552; Baltimore & P. R. Co. v. Fifth Baptist Church, 137 U. S. 568 , 11 S. Ct. 184 , 34 L. ed. 784; Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , ; 7 R. C. L. 60, § 42 et seq.; 14 C. J. 213, § 223 et seq.
Common School District No. 102 v. Consolidated School District No. 111-74 211 N.W. 960 Minn. 1927
Common School District No. 102 v. Consolidated School District No. 111-74 211 N.W. 960 Minn. 1927
The following authorities might lead to the conclusion that in this action the order is not open to attack: State v. Honerud, 66 Minn. 32 , ; Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , ; Hammer v. Narverud, 142 Minn. 199 , .
School District No. 135 v. McConnell 184 N.W. 369 Minn. 1921
School District No. 135 v. McConnell 184 N.W. 369 Minn. 1921
And see Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , .
Hammer v. Narverud 171 N.W. 770 Minn. 1919
Cooper, Myers & Co. v. Smith 166 N.W. 504 Minn. 1918
Cooper, Myers & Co. v. Smith 166 N.W. 504 Minn. 1918
See Evens v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59 , .