DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lundquist v. Peterson, 158 N.W. 426.

18 citing documents.

  • Straus v. Straus 94 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1959
  • Straus v. Straus 94 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1959
    As to whether an accounting between partners will lie even though a dissolution of the firm is sought, see McAlpine v. Millen, 104 Minn. 289 , ; Lundquist v. Peterson, 134 Minn. 279 , , ; Crawford v. Lugoff, 175 Minn. 226 , ; Kitzman v. Postier & Kruger Co. Inc. 204 Minn. 343 , ; Bailly v. Betti, 241 N. Y. 22 , 148 N. E. 776 .
  • Wilson v. Moline 38 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1949
  • Wilson v. Moline 38 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1949
    This was the position taken in Lundquist v. Peterson, 134 Minn. 279 , , reversed on rehearing.
  • Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co. 285 N.W. 809 Minn. 1939
  • Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co. 285 N.W. 809 Minn. 1939
    645 ; Lundquist v. Peterson, 134 Minn. 279 , 158 N.W.
  • Jewell v. Blanchett Investment Co. 271 N.W. 461 Minn. 1937
    Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Benson v. Larson, 133 Minn. 346 , ; Suess v. Arrowhead S. P. Co. 180 Minn. 21 , .
  • Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
    Co. 121 Minn. 445 , ; Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Benson v. Larson, 133 Minn. 346 , ; Hillstrom v. Mannheimer Bros. 146 Minn. 202 , ; Thomas v. Stevenson, 146 Minn. 272 , ; Unmacht v. Whitney, 146 Minn. 327 , ; Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co. 147 Minn. 52 , ; Cohen v. Silverman, *479 153 Minn. 391 , ; Frederick v. McRae, 157 Minn. 366
  • Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
    275 ; Benson v. Larson, 133 Minn. 346 , ; Hillstrom v. Mannheimer Bros. 146 Minn. 202 , 178 N.W.
  • Dux v. Ringdahl 235 N.W. 383 Minn. 1931
    Co. 133 Minn. 28 , ; Benson v. Larson, *614 133 Minn. 346 , ; Sullivan v. Minneapolis St.
  • Suess v. Arrowhead Steel Products Co. 230 N.W. 125 Minn. 1930
    Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Benson v. Larson, 133 Minn. 346 , ; Riser v. Smith, 136 Minn. 417 , ; Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co. 147 Minn. 52 , ; Elvidge v. Stronge & Warner Co. 148 Minn. 185 , ; Cohen v. Silverman, 153 Minn. 391 , ; Frederick v. McRae, 157 Minn. 366 , ; Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, 1
  • Christopherson v. Custom Laundry Co. 229 N.W. 136 Minn. 1930
    See also Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Benson v. Larson, 133 Minn. 346 , ; Hillstrom v. Mannheimer Brothers, 146 Minn. 202 , ; Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co. 147 Minn. 52 , ; Elvidge v. Strong & Warner Co. 148 Minn. 185 , ; Cohen v. Silverman, 153 Minn. 391 , ; Frederick v. McRae, 157 Minn. 366 , .
  • Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo Brother 206 N.W. 377 Minn. 1925
    Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Benson v. Larson, 133 Minn. 346 , ; Thomas v. Stevenson, 146 Minn. 272 , ; Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co. 147 Minn. 52 , ; Elvidge v. Strong & Warner Co. 148 Minn. 185 , ; Cohen v. Silverman, 153 Minn. 391 , ; Frederick v. McRae, 157 Minn. 366 , ; Kennedy v. Hedberg, 159 Minn. 76
  • Hillstrom v. Mannheimer Bros. 178 N.W. 881 Minn. 1920
    Schaar v. Conforth, 128 Minn. 460 , ; Benson v. Larson, 133 Minn. 346 , .
  • Porten v. Peterson 166 N.W. 183 Minn. 1918
  • Porten v. Peterson 166 N.W. 183 Minn. 1918
    447; Corrigan v. Foot, 126 Minn. 531 , ; Lundquist v. Peterson, 134 Minn. 279 , , .
  • Lundquist v. Peterson 165 N.W. 138 Minn. 1917
  • Lundquist v. Peterson 165 N.W. 138 Minn. 1917
    In our decision on the former appeal in this case, reported in 134 Minn. 279 , , , we held that the evidence sustained the findings of the trial court that defendants made fraudulent representations to the plaintiff at the time he transferred to them his interest in the property of a copartnership composed of plaintiff and defendants; that the evidence sustained a f