Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Farrell v. County of Sibley, 161 N.W. 152.

50 citing documents.

City of New Brighton v. Metropolitan Council 237 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1975
City of New Brighton v. Metropolitan Council 237 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1975
The decision in this case is analogous to decisions regarding changes in school district boundaries, Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , or the apportionment of taxes and assessments, Village of Edina v. Joseph, supra.
Peterson v. Board of County Commissioners 213 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1973
In Re Independent School Dist. No. 381 in Lake Cty. 213 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1973
In Re Independent School Dist. No. 381 in Lake Cty. 213 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1973
The scope of our review on an appeal of this kind is stated in Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , 161 N.W.
Peterson v. Board of County Commissioners 213 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1973
The scope of our review on an appeal of this kind is stated in Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , which is quoted in In re Certain School Districts, Freeborn County, 246 Minn. 96, 104
In Re Petition of Minneapolis Area Development Corp. 131 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1964
In Re Petition of Minneapolis Area Development Corp. 131 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1964
In Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439, 443 , , this court said: “* * * The evidence presented leaves the matter of the propriety of the proposed change, in our view thereof, in much doubt, and this alone precludes interference by the court with the action of the legislative body.” See, also, In re Certain School Dists.
COMMON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2386 v. County of Wabasha 121 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1963
COMMON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2386 v. County of Wabasha 121 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1963
No. 2, 119 Minn. 119 , ; Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , .
Walters v. Common School Districts Nos. 2550, 2551, 2583, & 2585 121 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1963
Walters v. Common School Districts Nos. 2550, 2551, 2583, & 2585 121 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1963
Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439, 441 , ; In re Certain School Dists.
Lieser v. Town of St. Martin 96 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1959
Lieser v. Town of St. Martin 96 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1959
that directed could not be sustained.” Bennett v. Beaty, 156 Minn. 293 , ; In re Establishment of Judicial Road, 176 Minn. 94 , ; Trout Brook Realty Co. v. Town of Featherstone, 173 Minn. 448 , ; Rask v. Town Board of Hendrum, 173 Minn. 572 , ; Severts v. County of Yellow Medicine, 148 Minn. 321 , ; Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; Sorknes v. Board of Co. Commrs.
Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44 74 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1956
In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn County 246 Minn. 96 Minn. 1956
In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn County 246 Minn. 96 Minn. 1956
Probably a restatement of the fundamental law will serve to clarify the matter to some extent, and probably as good a statement as any is that found in Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439, 440 , 161 N.W.
Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44 74 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1956
Probably a restatement of the fundamental law will serve to clarify the matter to some extent, and probably as good a statement as any is that found in Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439, 440 , , where we said: *105 “* * * The matter of establishing, enlarging the boundaries of or of dissolving municipal corporations is purely legislative.
Vaubel v. Village of Mapleton 261 N.W. 869 Minn. 1935
Vaubel v. Village of Mapleton 261 N.W. 869 Minn. 1935
Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439, 440, 441 , .
In Re Appeal of Consolidated School District No. 16 229 N.W. 585 Minn. 1930
In Re Appeal of Consolidated School District No. 16 229 N.W. 585 Minn. 1930
No. 31, 134 Minn. 82 , ; Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; Froehling v. Independent School Dist.
Packard v. County of Otter Tail 219 N.W. 289 Minn. 1928
Packard v. County of Otter Tail 219 N.W. 289 Minn. 1928
No. 31, 134 Minn. 82 , ; Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; Hall v. Commrs.
Rolf v. Town of Hancock 208 N.W. 757 Minn. 1926
Rolf v. Town of Hancock 208 N.W. 757 Minn. 1926
Schweigert v. Abbott, 122 Minn. 383 , ; Hunstiger v. Kilian, 130 Minn. 474 , ; Sorknes v. Board, 131 Minn. 79 , ; School District v. School District, 134 Minn. 82 , ; Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; Froehling v. Ind.
Independent School Distbict No. 36 v. Independent School Distbict No. 68 206 N.W. 719 Minn. 1925
Independent School Distbict No. 36 v. Independent School Distbict No. 68 206 N.W. 719 Minn. 1925
Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; Hall v. Board of Co. Commrs.
In re Judicial Ditch No. 10 194 N.W. 875 Minn. 1923
In re Judicial Ditch No. 10 194 N.W. 875 Minn. 1923
See also Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , .
Sartell v. County of Benton 183 N.W. 148 Minn. 1921
Sartell v. County of Benton 183 N.W. 148 Minn. 1921
of Chippewa County, 140 Minn. 133 , ; Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , .
Brazil v. County of Sibley 181 N.W. 329 Minn. 1921
Brazil v. County of Sibley 181 N.W. 329 Minn. 1921
Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , ; Hunstiger v. Kilian, 130 Minn. 474 , ; Hunstiger v. Kilian, 136 Minn. 64 , ; Paulson v. Board of Co. Commrs.
G. O. Miller Telephone Co. v. Minimum Wage Commission 177 N.W. 341 Minn. 1920
G. O. Miller Telephone Co. v. Minimum Wage Commission 177 N.W. 341 Minn. 1920
448 ; Hunstiger v. Kilian, 130 Minn. 474 , , and cases cited; Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , , and cases cited; State v. State Securities Commission, supra, page 221, .
State ex rel. Dybdal v. State Securities Commission 176 N.W. 759 Minn. 1920
State ex rel. Dybdal v. State Securities Commission 176 N.W. 759 Minn. 1920
Lac qui Parle County, 131 Minn. 79 , ; Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; Brazil v. County of Sibley, 139 Minn. 458 , , and cases cited; Hunstiger v. Kilian, 130 Minn. 474 , , where many cases are collected and discussed.
Consolidated School District No. 24 v. Stark 175 N.W. 898 Minn. 1920
Consolidated School District No. 24 v. Stark 175 N.W. 898 Minn. 1920
Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; Hall v. Board of Co. Commrs.
Independent School District No. 47 v. Meeker County 173 N.W. 850 Minn. 1919
Independent School District No. 47 v. Meeker County 173 N.W. 850 Minn. 1919
The limitation of the inquiry has been fully stated and discussed in the late cases of Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; Hall v. Board of Co. Commrs.
Hall v. Board of County Commissioners 167 N.W. 358 Minn. 1918
Hall v. Board of County Commissioners 167 N.W. 358 Minn. 1918
James, supra, page 71, ; Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , ; School District No. 36 v. School District No. 31, 134 Minn. 82 , ; Sorknes v. Board of Co. Commrs.
Froehling v. Independent School District No. 20 167 N.W. 108 Minn. 1918
Froehling v. Independent School District No. 20 167 N.W. 108 Minn. 1918
The appeal is ruled by Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , and the cases therein cited.
Brazil v. County of Sibley 166 N.W. 1077 Minn. 1918
Brazil v. County of Sibley 166 N.W. 1077 Minn. 1918
Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , .
Hunstiger v. Kilian 161 N.W. 263 Minn. 1917
Hunstiger v. Kilian 161 N.W. 263 Minn. 1917
This question was recently considered in Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , , involving the change of boundaries of school districts by the county board.