DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jacobs v. Jacobs, 161 N.W. 525.

40 citing documents.

  • Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 582 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1998
  • Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 582 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1998
    See Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo, 222 Minn. 141 , Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190, 161 N.W.
  • Willmore v. Willmore 143 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1966
  • Willmore v. Willmore 143 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1966
    In Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190, 194 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971, 973, we noted that under rules of early common law the father was entitled to custody of his children as against the mother under almost all circumstances, but that — “* * * [t]he rule governing these relations has been gradually changing until now the rule giving the f
  • Larkin v. Larkin 113 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1962
  • Larkin v. Larkin 113 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1962
    We pointed out in Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190, 199 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971, 975: “* * * The duty of the father to provide for his children continues whether he retains custody of them or not, unless the court, in some proceeding in which that question was involved and determined, has *419 made express provision for their support of such a natur
  • Anderson v. Anderson 109 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1961
  • Anderson v. Anderson 109 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1961
    In Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971, we stated that the trial court, under its general equitable powers and without statutory authority, may provide for a separate maintenance for the wife and her children, although she seeks neither a divorce nor a decree of separation, if she establishes a legal cause for living s
  • Donigan v. Donigan 53 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1952
  • Donigan v. Donigan 53 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1952
    Barich v. Barich, 201 Minn. 34 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; Pye v. Magnuson, 178 Minn. 531 , .
  • Atwood v. Atwood 39 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1949
  • Atwood v. Atwood 39 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1949
    1927, § 8614), as construed in Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971, authorized the district court in an action for divorce or separation, where a decree of divorce or separation was denied and the.
  • Warner v. Warner 17 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1944
  • Warner v. Warner 17 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1944
    901; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971.
  • State Ex Rel. Price v. Price 2 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1942
  • State Ex Rel. Price v. Price 2 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1942
    Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 3917D, 971; Spratt v. Spratt, 151 Minn. 458 , , ; State ex rel.
  • Quist v. Quist 290 N.W. 561 Minn. 1940
  • Quist v. Quist 290 N.W. 561 Minn. 1940
    See Beigler v. Chamberlin, 138 Minn. 377 , , L. R. A. 1918B, 215; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971.
  • State v. Washnesky 246 N.W. 366 Minn. 1933
  • State v. Washnesky 246 N.W. 366 Minn. 1933
    The mother says: “I don’t talk to him only when I have asked him for money.” The law as stated by Judge Taylor in Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190, 199 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971, is this: “The children are not responsible for the unfortunate differences which have caused the estrangement and separation of the parents and ought not to suffer therefrom.
  • Hervey v. Hervey 230 N.W. 479 Minn. 1930
  • Hervey v. Hervey 230 N.W. 479 Minn. 1930
    Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; Spratt v. Spratt, 151 Minn. 458 , , ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Sweet 228 N.W. 337 Minn. 1929
  • State v. Sweet 228 N.W. 337 Minn. 1929
    Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; Jackson v. Jackson, 168 Minn. 196 , .
  • Pye v. Magnuson 227 N.W. 895 Minn. 1929
  • Pye v. Magnuson 227 N.W. 895 Minn. 1929
    Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , ; Dorsey v. Dorsey, 142 Minn. 279 , ; Waller v. Waller, 160 Minn. 431 , .
  • Hoffmann v. Hoffmann 218 N.W. 559 Minn. 1928
  • Hoffmann v. Hoffmann 218 N.W. 559 Minn. 1928
    901; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; Jackson v. Jackson, 168 Minn. 196 , .
  • Jackson v. Jackson 209 N.W. 901 Minn. 1926
  • Jackson v. Jackson 209 N.W. 901 Minn. 1926
    901; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; Beigler v. Chamberlin, 138 Minn. 377 , , L. R. A. 1918B, 215; Re Koopman Children, 146 Minn. 36 , ; G. S. 1923, §§ 10135-10137.
  • Waller v. Waller 200 N.W. 480 Minn. 1924
  • Waller v. Waller 200 N.W. 480 Minn. 1924
    This principle is fairly derivable from Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; and Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , .
  • Eberhart v. Eberhart 189 N.W. 592 Minn. 1922
  • Eberhart v. Eberhart 189 N.W. 592 Minn. 1922
    Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R, A. 1917D, 971.
  • Spratt v. Spratt 185 N.W. 509 Minn. 1921
  • Spratt v. Spratt 185 N.W. 509 Minn. 1921
    Section 7442, G. S. 1913; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971.
  • Stephon v. Topic 180 N.W. 221 Minn. 1920
  • Stephon v. Topic 180 N.W. 221 Minn. 1920
    Byrnes v. Volz, 53 Minn. 110 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L.R.A.
  • Robertson v. Robertson 164 N.W. 980 Minn. 1917
  • Robertson v. Robertson 164 N.W. 980 Minn. 1917
    Stephen v. Stephen, 102 Minn. 301 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L.R.A.