Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kokesh v. Price, 161 N.W. 715.

40 citing documents.

Nadeau v. Melin 110 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1961
Nadeau v. Melin 110 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1961
4 See, Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , , 23 A. L. R. 643; Molden v. Minneapolis, St.
Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
14 Olson v. Kennedy Trading Co. 199 Minn. 493 , ; Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , , 23 A. L. R. 643; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , ; Truso v. Ehnert, 177 Minn. 249 , ; Prosser, Torts (2 ed.) § 65, p. 365; 13 Dunnell, Dig.
Hondl v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 82 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1957
Hondl v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 82 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1957
Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , , 23 A. L. R. 643; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Jenson v. Glemaker, 195 Minn. 556 , ; Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin R. Co. 98 Minn. 296 , ; Anderson v. Anderson, 188 Minn. 602 , .
Perry v. Reuter 38 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1949
Perry v. Reuter 38 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1949
There could not well be under' the holding in Kokesh v. Price, 186 Minn. 304 , , 23 A. L. R. 643.
Mattfeld v. Nester 32 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1948
Mattfeld v. Nester 32 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1948
Co. 191 Minn. 503 , ; Anderson v. Anderson, 188 Minn. 602 , ; Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , , 23 A. L. R. 643.
Murphy v. Keating 283 N.W. 389 Minn. 1939
Murphy v. Keating 283 N.W. 389 Minn. 1939
See also Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304, 309 , , 23 A. L. R. 643, where this court said: “If the driver of the vehicle is the agent of the passenger then the negligence of the driver, the agent, is the negligence of the passenger, the principal.” (Citing many cases.)
Munkel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 278 N.W. 41 Minn. 1938
Munkel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 278 N.W. 41 Minn. 1938
Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , , 23 A. L. R. 643; Olson v. Kennedy Trading Co. 199 Minn. 493 , .
Nelson v. Garden Valley Telephone Co. 275 N.W. 612 Minn. 1937
Nelson v. Garden Valley Telephone Co. 275 N.W. 612 Minn. 1937
Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , , 23 A. L. R. 643.
Olson v. Kennedy Trading Co. 272 N.W. 381 Minn. 1937
Olson v. Kennedy Trading Co. 272 N.W. 381 Minn. 1937
Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , , 23 A. L. R. 643.
Anderson v. Anderson 248 N.W. 35 Minn. 1933
Anderson v. Anderson 248 N.W. 35 Minn. 1933
Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , , 23 A. L. R. 643.
Martin v. Schiska 236 N.W. 312 Minn. 1931
Martin v. Schiska 236 N.W. 312 Minn. 1931
Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , 161 H. W. 715, 23 A. L. R. 643; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , .
Britta v. Ehnert 225 N.W. 98 Minn. 1929
Britta v. Ehnert 225 N.W. 98 Minn. 1929
Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304, 310 , , 23 A. L. R. 643.
Ellingson v. World Amusement Service Assn. Inc. 222 N.W. 335 Minn. 1928
Ellingson v. World Amusement Service Assn. Inc. 222 N.W. 335 Minn. 1928
Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304, ¶ 7 , , 23 A. L. R. 643; Stroher v. Elting, 97 N. Y. 102 , 49 Am.
Fitzgerald v. Village of Bovey 219 N.W. 774 Minn. 1928
Fitzgerald v. Village of Bovey 219 N.W. 774 Minn. 1928
Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304, 308 , , 23 A. L. R. 643; Lundh v. G. N. Ry.
Molden v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 208 N.W. 541 Minn. 1926
Molden v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 208 N.W. 541 Minn. 1926
935, nor Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , , 23 A. L. R. 643, which makes for the opposite view.
Lundh v. Great Northern Railway Co. 206 N.W. 43 Minn. 1925
Lundh v. Great Northern Railway Co. 206 N.W. 43 Minn. 1925
Co. 135 Minn. 37 , ; Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , , 23 A. L. R. 643; Kalland v. City of Brainerd, 141 Minn. 119 , ; Praught v. G. N. Ry.
Molden v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 200 N.W. 740 Minn. 1924
Molden v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 200 N.W. 740 Minn. 1924
La Riviere v. Pemberton, 46 Minn. 5 , ; Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , , 23 A. L. R. 643.
Hollister v. Hines 184 N.W. 856 Minn. 1921
Hollister v. Hines 184 N.W. 856 Minn. 1921
Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , ; 22 R. C. L. 1048.
Drimel v. Union Power Co. 165 N.W. 1058 Minn. 1918
Drimel v. Union Power Co. 165 N.W. 1058 Minn. 1918
See Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , ; 2 Illinois Law Rev. 487.
McDonald v. Mesaba Railway Co. 163 N.W. 298 Minn. 1917
McDonald v. Mesaba Railway Co. 163 N.W. 298 Minn. 1917
Kokesh v. Price, 136 Minn. 304 , , is the last.